scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Christina Williamson

Bio: Christina Williamson is an academic researcher from Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences. The author has contributed to research in topics: Aerosol & Troposphere. The author has an hindex of 23, co-authored 43 publications receiving 3450 citations. Previous affiliations of Christina Williamson include National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration & University of Colorado Boulder.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
22 Nov 2002-Science
TL;DR: It is found that wolves who were raised by humans do not show these same skills, whereas domestic dog puppies only a few weeks old, even those that have had little human contact, do show these skills.
Abstract: Dogs are more skillful than great apes at a number of tasks in which they must read human communicative signals indicating the location of hidden food. In this study, we found that wolves who were raised by humans do not show these same skills, whereas domestic dog puppies only a few weeks old, even those that have had little human contact, do show these skills. These findings suggest that during the process of domestication, dogs have been selected for a set of social-cognitive abilities that enable them to communicate with humans in unique ways.

917 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Joao Almeida1, Joao Almeida2, Siegfried Schobesberger3, Andreas Kürten2, Ismael K. Ortega3, Oona Kupiainen-Määttä3, Arnaud P. Praplan4, Alexey Adamov3, António Amorim5, F. Bianchi4, Martin Breitenlechner6, A. David1, Josef Dommen4, Neil M. Donahue7, Andrew J. Downard8, Eimear M. Dunne9, Jonathan Duplissy3, Sebastian Ehrhart2, Richard C. Flagan8, Alessandro Franchin3, Roberto Guida1, Jani Hakala3, Armin Hansel6, Martin Heinritzi6, Henning Henschel3, Tuija Jokinen3, Heikki Junninen3, Maija Kajos3, Juha Kangasluoma3, Helmi Keskinen10, Agnieszka Kupc11, Theo Kurtén3, Alexander N. Kvashin12, Ari Laaksonen13, Ari Laaksonen10, Katrianne Lehtipalo3, Markus Leiminger2, Johannes Leppä13, Ville Loukonen3, Vladimir Makhmutov12, Serge Mathot1, Matthew J. McGrath14, Tuomo Nieminen15, Tuomo Nieminen3, Tinja Olenius3, Antti Onnela1, Tuukka Petäjä3, Francesco Riccobono4, Ilona Riipinen16, Matti P. Rissanen3, Linda Rondo2, Taina Ruuskanen3, Filipe Duarte Santos5, Nina Sarnela3, Simon Schallhart3, R. Schnitzhofer6, John H. Seinfeld8, Mario Simon2, Mikko Sipilä3, Mikko Sipilä15, Yuri Stozhkov12, Frank Stratmann17, António Tomé5, Jasmin Tröstl4, Georgios Tsagkogeorgas17, Petri Vaattovaara10, Yrjö Viisanen13, Annele Virtanen10, Aron Vrtala11, Paul E. Wagner11, Ernest Weingartner4, Heike Wex17, Christina Williamson2, Daniela Wimmer3, Daniela Wimmer2, Penglin Ye7, Taina Yli-Juuti3, Kenneth S. Carslaw9, Markku Kulmala15, Markku Kulmala3, Joachim Curtius2, Urs Baltensperger4, Douglas R. Worsnop, Hanna Vehkamäki3, Jasper Kirkby1, Jasper Kirkby2 
17 Oct 2013-Nature
TL;DR: The results show that, in regions of the atmosphere near amine sources, both amines and sulphur dioxide should be considered when assessing the impact of anthropogenic activities on particle formation.
Abstract: Nucleation of aerosol particles from trace atmospheric vapours is thought to provide up to half of global cloud condensation nuclei(1). Aerosols can cause a net cooling of climate by scattering sun ...

738 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Jasmin Tröstl1, Wayne Chuang2, Hamish Gordon3, Martin Heinritzi4, Chao Yan5, Ugo Molteni1, Lars Ahlm6, Carla Frege1, F. Bianchi5, F. Bianchi7, F. Bianchi1, Robert Wagner5, Mario Simon4, Katrianne Lehtipalo1, Katrianne Lehtipalo5, Christina Williamson8, Christina Williamson4, Christina Williamson9, J. S. Craven10, Jonathan Duplissy11, Jonathan Duplissy5, Alexey Adamov5, Joao Almeida3, Anne-Kathrin Bernhammer12, Martin Breitenlechner12, Sophia Brilke4, Antonio Dias3, Sebastian Ehrhart3, Richard C. Flagan10, Alessandro Franchin5, Claudia Fuchs1, Roberto Guida3, Martin Gysel1, Armin Hansel12, Christopher R. Hoyle1, Tuija Jokinen5, Heikki Junninen5, Juha Kangasluoma5, Helmi Keskinen5, Helmi Keskinen13, Helmi Keskinen8, Jaeseok Kim13, Jaeseok Kim8, Manuel Krapf1, Andreas Kürten4, Ari Laaksonen13, Ari Laaksonen14, Michael J. Lawler13, Michael J. Lawler15, Markus Leiminger4, Serge Mathot3, Ottmar Möhler16, Tuomo Nieminen11, Tuomo Nieminen5, Antti Onnela3, Tuukka Petäjä5, Felix Piel4, Pasi Miettinen13, Matti P. Rissanen5, Linda Rondo4, Nina Sarnela5, Siegfried Schobesberger5, Siegfried Schobesberger8, Kamalika Sengupta17, Mikko Sipilä5, James N. Smith13, James N. Smith18, Gerhard Steiner12, Gerhard Steiner19, Gerhard Steiner5, António Tomé20, Annele Virtanen13, Andrea Christine Wagner4, Ernest Weingartner8, Ernest Weingartner1, Daniela Wimmer5, Daniela Wimmer4, Paul M. Winkler19, Penglin Ye2, Kenneth S. Carslaw17, Joachim Curtius4, Josef Dommen1, Jasper Kirkby3, Jasper Kirkby4, Markku Kulmala5, Ilona Riipinen6, Douglas R. Worsnop5, Douglas R. Worsnop11, Neil M. Donahue2, Neil M. Donahue5, Urs Baltensperger1 
26 May 2016-Nature
TL;DR: It is shown that organic vapours alone can drive nucleation, and a particle growth model is presented that quantitatively reproduces the measurements and implements a parameterization of the first steps of growth in a global aerosol model that can change substantially in response to concentrations of atmospheric cloud concentration nuclei.
Abstract: About half of present-day cloud condensation nuclei originate from atmospheric nucleation, frequently appearing as a burst of new particles near midday. Atmospheric observations show that the growth rate of new particles often accelerates when the diameter of the particles is between one and ten nanometres. In this critical size range, new particles are most likely to be lost by coagulation with pre-existing particles, thereby failing to form new cloud condensation nuclei that are typically 50 to 100 nanometres across. Sulfuric acid vapour is often involved in nucleation but is too scarce to explain most subsequent growth, leaving organic vapours as the most plausible alternative, at least in the planetary boundary layer. Although recent studies predict that low-volatility organic vapours contribute during initial growth, direct evidence has been lacking. The accelerating growth may result from increased photolytic production of condensable organic species in the afternoon, and the presence of a possible Kelvin (curvature) effect, which inhibits organic vapour condensation on the smallest particles (the nano-Kohler theory), has so far remained ambiguous. Here we present experiments performed in a large chamber under atmospheric conditions that investigate the role of organic vapours in the initial growth of nucleated organic particles in the absence of inorganic acids and bases such as sulfuric acid or ammonia and amines, respectively. Using data from the same set of experiments, it has been shown that organic vapours alone can drive nucleation. We focus on the growth of nucleated particles and find that the organic vapours that drive initial growth have extremely low volatilities (saturation concentration less than 10(-4.5) micrograms per cubic metre). As the particles increase in size and the Kelvin barrier falls, subsequent growth is primarily due to more abundant organic vapours of slightly higher volatility (saturation concentrations of 10(-4.5) to 10(-0.5) micrograms per cubic metre). We present a particle growth model that quantitatively reproduces our measurements. Furthermore, we implement a parameterization of the first steps of growth in a global aerosol model and find that concentrations of atmospheric cloud concentration nuclei can change substantially in response, that is, by up to 50 per cent in comparison with previously assumed growth rate parameterizations.

507 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
27 May 2016-Science
TL;DR: Observational evidence is provided that at high altitudes, NPF occurs mainly through condensation of highly oxygenated molecules (HOMs), in addition to taking place through sulfuric acid–ammonia nucleation, which is more than 10 times faster than ion-induced nucleation and growth rates are size-dependent.
Abstract: New particle formation (NPF) is the source of over half of the atmosphere's cloud condensation nuclei, thus influencing cloud properties and Earth's energy balance. Unlike in the planetary boundary layer, few observations of NPF in the free troposphere exist. We provide observational evidence that at high altitudes, NPF occurs mainly through condensation of highly oxygenated molecules (HOMs), in addition to taking place through sulfuric acid-ammonia nucleation. Neutral nucleation is more than 10 times faster than ion-induced nucleation, and growth rates are size-dependent. NPF is restricted to a time window of 1 to 2 days after contact of the air masses with the planetary boundary layer; this is related to the time needed for oxidation of organic compounds to form HOMs. These findings require improved NPF parameterization in atmospheric models.

336 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
02 Dec 2016-Science
TL;DR: In this article, the authors build a global model of aerosol formation using extensive laboratory-measured nucleation rates involving sulfuric acid, ammonia, ions and organic compounds, and a comparison with atmospheric observations show that nearly all nucleation throughout the present-day atmosphere involves ammonia or biogenic organic compounds.
Abstract: Fundamental questions remain about the origin of newly formed atmospheric aerosol particles because data from laboratory measurements have been insufficient to build global models In contrast, gas-phase chemistry models have been based on laboratory kinetics measurements for decades Here we build a global model of aerosol formation using extensive laboratory-measured nucleation rates involving sulfuric acid, ammonia, ions and organic compounds The simulations and a comparison with atmospheric observations show that nearly all nucleation throughout the present-day atmosphere involves ammonia or biogenic organic compounds in addition to sulfuric acid A significant fraction of nucleation involves ions, but the relatively weak dependence on ion concentrations indicates that for the processes studied variations in cosmic ray intensity do not significantly affect climate via nucleation in the present-day atmosphere

260 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is argued and present evidence that great apes understand the basics of intentional action, but they still do not participate in activities involving joint intentions and attention (shared intentionality), and children's skills of shared intentionality develop gradually during the first 14 months of life.
Abstract: We propose that the crucial difference between human cognition and that of other species is the ability to participate with others in collaborative activities with shared goals and intentions: shared intentionality. Participation in such activities requires not only especially powerful forms of intention reading and cultural learning, but also a unique motivation to share psychological states with oth- ers and unique forms of cognitive representation for doing so. The result of participating in these activities is species-unique forms of cultural cognition and evolution, enabling everything from the creation and use of linguistic symbols to the construction of social norms and individual beliefs to the establishment of social institutions. In support of this proposal we argue and present evidence that great apes (and some children with autism) understand the basics of intentional action, but they still do not participate in activities involving joint intentions and attention (shared intentionality). Human children's skills of shared intentionality develop gradually during the first 14 months of life as two ontogenetic pathways intertwine: (1) the general ape line of understanding others as animate, goal-directed, and intentional agents; and (2) a species-unique motivation to share emotions, experience, and activities with other persons. The develop- mental outcome is children's ability to construct dialogic cognitive representations, which enable them to participate in earnest in the collectivity that is human cognition.

3,660 citations

Book
01 Jan 2008
TL;DR: For instance, the authors argues that human cooperative communication is grounded in a psychological infrastructure of shared intentionality (joint attention, common ground), evolved originally for collaboration and culture more generally.
Abstract: Winner, 2009 Eleanor Maccoby Book Award in Developmental Psychology, presented by the American Psychological Association. and Honorable Mention, Literature, Language & Linguistics category, 2008 PROSE Awards presented by the Professional/Scholarly Publishing Division of the Association of American Publishers. Human communication is grounded in fundamentally cooperative, even shared, intentions. In this original and provocative account of the evolutionary origins of human communication, Michael Tomasello connects the fundamentally cooperative structure of human communication (initially discovered by Paul Grice) to the especially cooperative structure of human (as opposed to other primate) social interaction. Tomasello argues that human cooperative communication rests on a psychological infrastructure of shared intentionality (joint attention, common ground), evolved originally for collaboration and culture more generally. The basic motives of the infrastructure are helping and sharing: humans communicate to request help, inform others of things helpfully, and share attitudes as a way of bonding within the cultural group. These cooperative motives each created different functional pressures for conventionalizing grammatical constructions. Requesting help in the immediate you-and-me and here-and-now, for example, required very little grammar, but informing and sharing required increasingly complex grammatical devices. Drawing on empirical research into gestural and vocal communication by great apes and human infants (much of it conducted by his own research team), Tomasello argues further that humans' cooperative communication emerged first in the natural gestures of pointing and pantomiming. Conventional communication, first gestural and then vocal, evolved only after humans already possessed these natural gestures and their shared intentionality infrastructure along with skills of cultural learning for creating and passing along jointly understood communicative conventions. Challenging the Chomskian view that linguistic knowledge is innate, Tomasello proposes instead that the most fundamental aspects of uniquely human communication are biological adaptations for cooperative social interaction in general and that the purely linguistic dimensions of human communication are cultural conventions and constructions created by and passed along within particular cultural groups. Jean Nicod Lectures A Bradford Book

2,639 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
07 Sep 2007-Science
TL;DR: Supporting the cultural intelligence hypothesis and contradicting the hypothesis that humans simply have more “general intelligence,” it is found that the children and chimpanzees had very similar cognitive skills for dealing with the physical world but that theChildren had more sophisticated cognitive skills than either of the ape species for dealingWith the social world.
Abstract: Humans have many cognitive skills not possessed by their nearest primate relatives. The cultural intelligence hypothesis argues that this is mainly due to a species-specific set of social-cognitive skills, emerging early in ontogeny, for participating and exchanging knowledge in cultural groups. We tested this hypothesis by giving a comprehensive battery of cognitive tests to large numbers of two of humans' closest primate relatives, chimpanzees and orangutans, as well as to 2.5-year-old human children before literacy and schooling. Supporting the cultural intelligence hypothesis and contradicting the hypothesis that humans simply have more "general intelligence," we found that the children and chimpanzees had very similar cognitive skills for dealing with the physical world but that the children had more sophisticated cognitive skills than either of the ape species for dealing with the social world.

1,138 citations

MonographDOI
TL;DR: The authors exploit newly available massive natu- ral language corpora to capture the language as a language evolution phenomenon. But their work is limited to a subset of the languages in the corpus.

826 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
29 Jun 2007-Science
TL;DR: Going into the future, scientists can help humanity to domesticate nature more wisely by quantifying the tradeoffs among ecosystem services, such as how increasing the provision of one service may decrease ecosystem resilience and the provisionof other services.
Abstract: Like all species, humans have exercised their impulse to perpetuate and propagate themselves. In doing so, we have domesticated landscapes and ecosystems in ways that enhance our food supplies, reduce exposure to predators and natural dangers, and promote commerce. On average, the net benefits to humankind of domesticated nature have been positive. We have, of course, made mistakes, causing unforeseen changes in ecosystem attributes, while leaving few, if any, truly wild places on Earth. Going into the future, scientists can help humanity to domesticate nature more wisely by quantifying the tradeoffs among ecosystem services, such as how increasing the provision of one service may decrease ecosystem resilience and the provision of other services.

791 citations