C
Christine L. Cameron
Researcher at University of Kansas
Publications - 8
Citations - 1942
Christine L. Cameron is an academic researcher from University of Kansas. The author has contributed to research in topics: Emotional approach coping & Coping (psychology). The author has an hindex of 8, co-authored 8 publications receiving 1866 citations. Previous affiliations of Christine L. Cameron include National Institutes of Health & NorthShore University HealthSystem.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Emotionally expressive coping predicts psychological and physical adjustment to breast cancer.
Annette L. Stanton,Sharon Danoff-Burg,Christine L. Cameron,Michelle Bishop,Charlotte A. Collins,Sarah B. Kirk,Lisa A. Sworowski,Robert Twillman +7 more
TL;DR: For example, this paper found that women who coped through expressing emotions surrounding cancer had fewer medical appointments for cancer-related morbidities, enhanced physical health and vigor, and decreased distress during the next 3 months compared with those low in emotional expression, with age, other coping strategy scores, and initial levels on dependent variables controlled statistically.
Journal ArticleDOI
Coping through emotional approach: scale construction and validation.
TL;DR: In this article, the authors demonstrate the psychometric adequacy and validity of scales designed to assess coping through emotional approach, and highlight the utility of functionalist theories of emotion as applied to coping theory.
Journal ArticleDOI
Coping through emotional approach: problems of conceptualization and confounding.
TL;DR: Two studies supported hypotheses that published scales tapping coping through processing and expressing emotion are confounded with psychopathology, and that EAC, when tapped by items uncontaminated by distress, is beneficial under specific conditions.
Journal ArticleDOI
Social comparison and adjustment to breast cancer: an experimental examination of upward affiliation and downward evaluation.
TL;DR: Participants demonstrated a greater desire for information and emotional support from the well-adjusted target than from the poorly adjusted target, and a pervasive tendency toward downward comparison in self-evaluation also was noted.
Journal ArticleDOI
Treatment decision making and adjustment to breast cancer: A longitudinal study.
Annette L. Stanton,Melissa A. Estes,Norman C. Estes,Christine L. Cameron,Sharon Danoff-Burg,Lori M. Irving +5 more
TL;DR: Borderline constructs from subjective expected utility theory were tested with regard to their ability to predict patients' choice of surgical treatment as well as psychological distress and well-being over time.