scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Christopher J L Murray

Bio: Christopher J L Murray is an academic researcher from Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation. The author has contributed to research in topics: Population & Mortality rate. The author has an hindex of 209, co-authored 754 publications receiving 310329 citations. Previous affiliations of Christopher J L Murray include Harvard University & University of Washington.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article , the authors found that high systolic blood pressure (SBP) exposure between 107.5 and 165.0 mm Hg raised risk by 101.36% on average, yielding a risk outcome score (ROS) and corresponding star rating (one to five).
Abstract: High systolic blood pressure (SBP) is a major risk factor for ischemic heart disease (IHD), the leading cause of death worldwide. Using data from published observational studies and controlled trials, we estimated the mean SBP-IHD dose-response function and burden of proof risk function (BPRF), and we calculated a risk outcome score (ROS) and corresponding star rating (one to five). We found a very strong, significant harmful effect of SBP on IHD, with a mean risk-relative to that at 100 mm Hg SBP-of 1.39 (95% uncertainty interval including between-study heterogeneity 1.34-1.44) at 120 mm Hg, 1.81 (1.70-1.93) at 130 mm Hg and 4.48 (3.81-5.26) at 165 mm Hg. The conservative BPRF measure indicated that SBP exposure between 107.5 and 165.0 mm Hg raised risk by 101.36% on average, yielding a ROS of 0.70 and star rating of five. Our analysis shows that IHD risk was already increasing at 120 mm Hg SBP, rising steadily up to 165 mm Hg and increasing less steeply above that point. Our study endorses the need to prioritize and strengthen strategies for screening, to raise awareness of the need for timely diagnosis and treatment of hypertension and to increase the resources allocated for understanding primordial prevention of elevated blood pressure.

13 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This thematic series of Population Health Metrics clearly shows that automated methods for VA are more accurate, faster, and cheaper than traditional physician review, and represents a substantial increase in knowledge about the comparative performance of various methods to assign causes of death.
Abstract: Editorial Critical information on population health is needed to inform planning, resource allocation, program implementation, monitoring, and evaluation. One of the key descriptors of a population’s health is information about causes of death. Since many countries lack complete vital registration systems with medical certification of deaths, cause of death information is often missing. Verbal autopsy (VA) can be used to determine individuals’ causes of death and cause-specific mortality fractions in populations without a complete vital registration system. A standard VA instrument paired with easy-to-implement and reliable analytic methods could help bridge significant gaps in information about causes of death, particularly in resource-poor settings. A great deal of research has been conducted in the past several decades about VA and its application in the field, particularly in research settings, but some traditional methods of implementation and analysis can be costly, time-consuming, and potentially of varying quality. Verbal autopsies can now be analyzed using a much wider array of innovative techniques, most of which will be less expensive and yield higher quality results than current practice. What has been missing from the field of verbal autopsy is a collection of the most up-to-date research to help decision-makers choose the best and most cost-effective VA techniques to identify causes of death in their populations. This thematic series of Population Health Metrics, “Verbal autopsy: innovations, applications, opportunities,” was developed in response to this need. The research published in this thematic series emerged from the “Global Congress on Verbal Autopsy: State of the Science,” held in Bali, Indonesia, in February 2011. The conference was co-sponsored by the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, the University of Queensland School of Population Health, and Population Health Metrics. The Congress convened the global research and policy community who currently work with VA data, or who could greatly benefit from doing so. The conference inspired vibrant discussions about critical aspects of VA, including instrument design, analysis methods, and the potential use of VA in national health information systems. By convening a wide array of participants with different perspectives, a greater exchange of ideas, collaboration, and intellectual innovation was encouraged to advance the use and understanding of VA as a mechanism for gathering valuable information about causes of death in populations. The innovative research presented at the conference has motivated the creation of a community of scientists, policymakers, and practitioners dedicated to furthering this important field of population health. In an effort to promote and disseminate the key research breakthroughs discussed at the Global Congress, we are publishing this thematic series. After peer review, 24 papers and eight commentaries were accepted for publication. The innovations in VA detailed in these papers represent a substantial increase in knowledge about the comparative performance of various methods to assign causes of death, from applications of methods used in current practice, including physician review, to a rigorous validation of new automated methods with significant potential for future application in routine national and research data collection platforms. We expect that this thematic series of Population Health Metrics will provide an opportunity for informed discussion and debate and hopefully will stimulate the widespread application of VA where it is needed. This collection of research clearly shows that automated methods for VA are more accurate, faster, and cheaper than traditional physician review. Scientific innovation has taken VA from infancy to maturity. While methods innovation will and must continue, we hope that this thematic series will stimulate debate, * Correspondence: cjlm@u.washington.edu Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, 2301 Fifth Ave, Suite 600, Seattle, WA 98121, USA Full list of author information is available at the end of the article Murray et al. Population Health Metrics 2011, 9:18 http://www.pophealthmetrics.com/content/9/1/18

13 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Nicholas L S Roberts, Emily K Johnson, Scott M. Zeng, Erin B. Hamilton, Amir Abdoli, Fares Alahdab, Vahid Alipour, Robert Ancuceanu, Catalina Liliana Andrei, Davood Anvari, Jalal Arabloo, Marcel Ausloos, Atalel Fentahun Awedew, Ashish Badiye, Shankar M Bakkannavar, Ashish Bhalla, Nikha Bhardwaj, Pankaj Bhardwaj, Soumyadeep Bhaumik, Ali Bijani, Archith Boloor, Tianji Cai, Félix Carvalho, Dinh-Toi Chu, Rosa A. S. Couto, Xiaochen Dai, Abebaw Alemayehu Desta, Hoa Thi Do, Lucas Earl, Aziz Eftekhari, Firooz Esmaeilzadeh, Farshad Farzadfar, Eduarda Fernandes, Irina Filip, Masoud Foroutan, Richard C. Franklin, Abhay Gaidhane, Birhan Gebresillassie Gebregiorgis, Berhe Gebremichael, Ahmad Ghashghaee, Mahaveer Golechha, Samer Hamidi, Syed E Haque, Khezar Hayat, Claudiu Herteliu, Olayinka Stephen Ilesanmi, M. Mofizul Islam, Jagnoor Jagnoor, Tanuj Kanchan, Neeti Kapoor, Ejaz Ahmad Khan, Mahalaqua Nazli Khatib, Roba Khundkar, Kewal Krishan, G Anil Kumar, Nithin Kumar, Iván Landires, Stephen S Lim, Mohammed Madadin, Venkatesh Maled, Navid Manafi, Laurie B. Marczak, Ritesh G. Menezes, Tuomo J. Meretoja, Ted R. Miller, Abdollah Mohammadian-Hafshejani, Ali H. Mokdad, Francis N.P. Monteiro, Maryam Moradi, Vinod C Nayak, Cuong Tat Nguyen, Huong Lan Thi Nguyen, Virginia Núñez-Samudio, Samuel M. Ostroff, Jagadish Rao Padubidri, Hai Quang Pham, Marina Pinheiro, Majid Pirestani, Zahiruddin Quazi Syed, Navid Rabiee, Amir Radfar, Vafa Rahimi-Movaghar, Sowmya J. Rao, Prateek Rastogi, David Laith Rawaf, Salman Rawaf, Robert C. Reiner, Amirhossein Sahebkar, Abdallah M. Samy, Monika Sawhney, David C. Schwebel, Subramanian Senthilkumaran, Masood Ali Shaikh, Valentin Yurievich Skryabin, Anna Aleksandrovna Skryabina, Amin Soheili, Mark A. Stokes, Rekha Thapar, Marcos Roberto Tovani-Palone, Bach Xuan Tran, Ravensara S. Travillian, Diana Zuleika Velazquez, Zhi-Jiang Zhang, Mohsen Naghavi, Rakhi Dandona, Lalit Dandona, Spencer L. James, David M. Pigott, Christopher J L Murray, Simon I. Hay, Theo Vos, Kanyin Ong 
TL;DR: In 2019, 63,400 people (95% uncertainty interval 38,900-78,600) died globally from snakebites, which was equal to an age-standardized mortality rate (ASMR) of 0.8 deaths per 100,000 and represents a 36% decrease in ASMR since 1990 as discussed by the authors .
Abstract: Abstract Snakebite envenoming is an important cause of preventable death. The World Health Organization (WHO) set a goal to halve snakebite mortality by 2030. We used verbal autopsy and vital registration data to model the proportion of venomous animal deaths due to snakes by location, age, year, and sex, and applied these proportions to venomous animal contact mortality estimates from the Global Burden of Disease 2019 study. In 2019, 63,400 people (95% uncertainty interval 38,900–78,600) died globally from snakebites, which was equal to an age-standardized mortality rate (ASMR) of 0.8 deaths (0.5–1.0) per 100,000 and represents a 36% (2–49) decrease in ASMR since 1990. India had the greatest number of deaths in 2019, equal to an ASMR of 4.0 per 100,000 (2.3—5.0). We forecast mortality will continue to decline, but not sufficiently to meet WHO’s goals. Improved data collection should be prioritized to help target interventions, improve burden estimation, and monitor progress.

12 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A substantial proportion of the worldwide burden of cancer could be prevented through the application of existing cancer control knowledge and by implementing programs for tobacco control, vaccination, and early detection and treatment, as well as public health campaigns promoting physical activity and a healthier dietary intake.
Abstract: The global burden of cancer continues to increase largely because of the aging and growth of the world population alongside an increasing adoption of cancer-causing behaviors, particularly smoking, in economically developing countries. Based on the GLOBOCAN 2008 estimates, about 12.7 million cancer cases and 7.6 million cancer deaths are estimated to have occurred in 2008; of these, 56% of the cases and 64% of the deaths occurred in the economically developing world. Breast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer and the leading cause of cancer death among females, accounting for 23% of the total cancer cases and 14% of the cancer deaths. Lung cancer is the leading cancer site in males, comprising 17% of the total new cancer cases and 23% of the total cancer deaths. Breast cancer is now also the leading cause of cancer death among females in economically developing countries, a shift from the previous decade during which the most common cause of cancer death was cervical cancer. Further, the mortality burden for lung cancer among females in developing countries is as high as the burden for cervical cancer, with each accounting for 11% of the total female cancer deaths. Although overall cancer incidence rates in the developing world are half those seen in the developed world in both sexes, the overall cancer mortality rates are generally similar. Cancer survival tends to be poorer in developing countries, most likely because of a combination of a late stage at diagnosis and limited access to timely and standard treatment. A substantial proportion of the worldwide burden of cancer could be prevented through the application of existing cancer control knowledge and by implementing programs for tobacco control, vaccination (for liver and cervical cancers), and early detection and treatment, as well as public health campaigns promoting physical activity and a healthier dietary intake. Clinicians, public health professionals, and policy makers can play an active role in accelerating the application of such interventions globally.

52,293 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A substantial portion of cancer cases and deaths could be prevented by broadly applying effective prevention measures, such as tobacco control, vaccination, and the use of early detection tests.
Abstract: Cancer constitutes an enormous burden on society in more and less economically developed countries alike. The occurrence of cancer is increasing because of the growth and aging of the population, as well as an increasing prevalence of established risk factors such as smoking, overweight, physical inactivity, and changing reproductive patterns associated with urbanization and economic development. Based on GLOBOCAN estimates, about 14.1 million new cancer cases and 8.2 million deaths occurred in 2012 worldwide. Over the years, the burden has shifted to less developed countries, which currently account for about 57% of cases and 65% of cancer deaths worldwide. Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death among males in both more and less developed countries, and has surpassed breast cancer as the leading cause of cancer death among females in more developed countries; breast cancer remains the leading cause of cancer death among females in less developed countries. Other leading causes of cancer death in more developed countries include colorectal cancer among males and females and prostate cancer among males. In less developed countries, liver and stomach cancer among males and cervical cancer among females are also leading causes of cancer death. Although incidence rates for all cancers combined are nearly twice as high in more developed than in less developed countries in both males and females, mortality rates are only 8% to 15% higher in more developed countries. This disparity reflects regional differences in the mix of cancers, which is affected by risk factors and detection practices, and/or the availability of treatment. Risk factors associated with the leading causes of cancer death include tobacco use (lung, colorectal, stomach, and liver cancer), overweight/obesity and physical inactivity (breast and colorectal cancer), and infection (liver, stomach, and cervical cancer). A substantial portion of cancer cases and deaths could be prevented by broadly applying effective prevention measures, such as tobacco control, vaccination, and the use of early detection tests.

23,203 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The results for 20 world regions are presented, summarizing the global patterns for the eight most common cancers, and striking differences in the patterns of cancer from region to region are observed.
Abstract: Estimates of the worldwide incidence and mortality from 27 cancers in 2008 have been prepared for 182 countries as part of the GLOBOCAN series published by the International Agency for Research on Cancer. In this article, we present the results for 20 world regions, summarizing the global patterns for the eight most common cancers. Overall, an estimated 12.7 million new cancer cases and 7.6 million cancer deaths occur in 2008, with 56% of new cancer cases and 63% of the cancer deaths occurring in the less developed regions of the world. The most commonly diagnosed cancers worldwide are lung (1.61 million, 12.7% of the total), breast (1.38 million, 10.9%) and colorectal cancers (1.23 million, 9.7%). The most common causes of cancer death are lung cancer (1.38 million, 18.2% of the total), stomach cancer (738,000 deaths, 9.7%) and liver cancer (696,000 deaths, 9.2%). Cancer is neither rare anywhere in the world, nor mainly confined to high-resource countries. Striking differences in the patterns of cancer from region to region are observed.

21,040 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is recommended that spirometry is required for the clinical diagnosis of COPD to avoid misdiagnosis and to ensure proper evaluation of severity of airflow limitation.
Abstract: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) remains a major public health problem. It is the fourth leading cause of chronic morbidity and mortality in the United States, and is projected to rank fifth in 2020 in burden of disease worldwide, according to a study published by the World Bank/World Health Organization. Yet, COPD remains relatively unknown or ignored by the public as well as public health and government officials. In 1998, in an effort to bring more attention to COPD, its management, and its prevention, a committed group of scientists encouraged the U.S. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and the World Health Organization to form the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD). Among the important objectives of GOLD are to increase awareness of COPD and to help the millions of people who suffer from this disease and die prematurely of it or its complications. The first step in the GOLD program was to prepare a consensus report, Global Strategy for the Diagnosis, Management, and Prevention of COPD, published in 2001. The present, newly revised document follows the same format as the original consensus report, but has been updated to reflect the many publications on COPD that have appeared. GOLD national leaders, a network of international experts, have initiated investigations of the causes and prevalence of COPD in their countries, and developed innovative approaches for the dissemination and implementation of COPD management guidelines. We appreciate the enormous amount of work the GOLD national leaders have done on behalf of their patients with COPD. Despite the achievements in the 5 years since the GOLD report was originally published, considerable additional work is ahead of us if we are to control this major public health problem. The GOLD initiative will continue to bring COPD to the attention of governments, public health officials, health care workers, and the general public, but a concerted effort by all involved in health care will be necessary.

17,023 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Findings indicate that the "diabetes epidemic" will continue even if levels of obesity remain constant, and given the increasing prevalence of obesity, it is likely that these figures provide an underestimate of future diabetes prevalence.
Abstract: OBJECTIVE —The goal of this study was to estimate the prevalence of diabetes and the number of people of all ages with diabetes for years 2000 and 2030. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS —Data on diabetes prevalence by age and sex from a limited number of countries were extrapolated to all 191 World Health Organization member states and applied to United Nations’ population estimates for 2000 and 2030. Urban and rural populations were considered separately for developing countries. RESULTS —The prevalence of diabetes for all age-groups worldwide was estimated to be 2.8% in 2000 and 4.4% in 2030. The total number of people with diabetes is projected to rise from 171 million in 2000 to 366 million in 2030. The prevalence of diabetes is higher in men than women, but there are more women with diabetes than men. The urban population in developing countries is projected to double between 2000 and 2030. The most important demographic change to diabetes prevalence across the world appears to be the increase in the proportion of people >65 years of age. CONCLUSIONS —These findings indicate that the “diabetes epidemic” will continue even if levels of obesity remain constant. Given the increasing prevalence of obesity, it is likely that these figures provide an underestimate of future diabetes prevalence.

16,648 citations