scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Christopher Stroh

Bio: Christopher Stroh is an academic researcher from Merck KGaA. The author has contributed to research in topics: Medicine & Lung cancer. The author has an hindex of 6, co-authored 11 publications receiving 3527 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the efficacy of cetuximab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin (FOLFIRI) as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer was investigated.
Abstract: Background We investigated the efficacy of cetuximab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin (FOLFIRI) as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer and sought associations between the mutation status of the KRAS gene in tumors and clinical response to cetuximab. Methods We randomly assigned patients with epidermal growth factor receptor–positive colorectal cancer with unresectable metastases to receive FOLFIRI either alone or in combination with cetuximab. The primary end point was progression-free survival. Results A total of 599 patients received cetuximab plus FOLFIRI, and 599 received FOLFIRI alone. The hazard ratio for progression-free survival in the cetuximab–FOLFIRI group as compared with the FOLFIRI group was 0.85 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.72 to 0.99; P=0.048). There was no significant difference in the overall survival between the two treatment groups (hazard ratio, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.81 to 1.07; P=0.31). There was a significant interaction between treatment group and KRAS ...

3,504 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The FLEX study as discussed by the authors showed that the addition of cetuximab to cisplatin and vinorelbine significantly improved overall survival in the first-line treatment of EGFRexpressing, advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Abstract: Summary Background Findings from the phase 3 FLEX study showed that the addition of cetuximab to cisplatin and vinorelbine significantly improved overall survival, compared with cisplatin and vinorelbine alone, in the first-line treatment of EGFR-expressing, advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We investigated whether candidate biomarkers were predictive for the efficacy of chemotherapy plus cetuximab in this setting. Methods Genomic DNA extracted from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumour tissue of patients enrolled in the FLEX study was screened for KRAS codon 12 and 13 and EGFR kinase domain mutations with PCR-based assays. In FFPE tissue sections, EGFR copy number was assessed by dual-colour fluorescence in-situ hybridisation and PTEN expression by immunohistochemistry. Treatment outcome was investigated according to biomarker status in all available samples from patients in the intention-to-treat population. The primary endpoint in the FLEX study was overall survival. The FLEX study, which is ongoing but not recruiting participants, is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00148798. Findings KRAS mutations were detected in 75 of 395 (19%) tumours and activating EGFR mutations in 64 of 436 (15%). EGFR copy number was scored as increased in 102 of 279 (37%) tumours and PTEN expression as negative in 107 of 303 (35%). Comparisons of treatment outcome between the two groups (chemotherapy plus cetuximab vs chemotherapy alone) according to biomarker status provided no indication that these biomarkers were of predictive value. Activating EGFR mutations were identified as indicators of good prognosis, with patients in both treatment groups whose tumours carried such mutations having improved survival compared with those whose tumours did not (chemotherapy plus cetuximab: median 17·5 months [95% CI 11·7–23·4] vs 8·5 months [7·1–10·8], hazard ratio [HR] 0·52 [0·32–0·84], p=0·0063; chemotherapy alone: 23·8 months [15·2–not reached] vs 10·0 months [8·7–11·0], HR 0·35 [0·21–0·59], p Interpretation The efficacy of chemotherapy plus cetuximab in the first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC seems to be independent of each of the biomarkers assessed. Funding Merck KGaA.

194 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The prospects for selective MET inhibitors in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer harboring MET exon 14 skipping are discussed and increasing evidence suggests that tumors carrying such mutations are sensitive to MET inhibition, raising the hope that selectiveMET inhibitors will provide patients with optimal anticancer activity with minimal toxicity.

48 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This analysis assessed treatment outcome according to tumor HER2 status (a pre-defined subgroup) and EGFR expression in EXPAND study pts, finding that pts with HER2 +ve tumors had a longer median overall survival.
Abstract: 4021 Background: In the EXPAND study adding cetuximab to first-line capecitabine and cisplatin chemotherapy (CT) failed to improve clinical outcome in patients (pts) with advanced gastric or gastro...

27 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Cetuximab activity in NSCLC patient-derived xenograft models was demonstrated clearly only in tumors that expressed high levels of EGFR, as defined by an IHC score of ≥200.
Abstract: Purpose: To explore in a panel of patient-derived xenograft models of human non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whether high EGFR expression, was associated with cetuximab activity. Experimental Design: NSCLC patient-derived xenograft models (n=45) were implanted subcutaneously into panels of nude mice and randomization cohorts were treated with either cetuximab, cisplatin, cisplatin plus cetuximab, vehicle control, or else were left untreated. Responses according to treatment were assessed at week 3 by analyzing the relative change in tumor volume and an experimental analogue of the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) guidelines. An EGFR immunohistochemistry score was calculated for each patient-derived xenograft model and response was assessed according to EGFR expression level. Results: When tumors were stratified into high and low EGFR expression groups (immunohistochemistry score threshold 200; scale 0-300), a stronger antitumor activity was seen in the high EGFR expression group compared with the low EGFR expression group in both the cetuximab monotherapy and cisplatin plus cetuximab combination therapy settings. For tumors treated with cisplatin plus cetuximab, the objective response rate was significantly higher in the high EGFR expression group compared with the low EGFR expression group (68% vs 29%). Objective response rates were similar in high and low expression groups for tumors treated with cisplatin alone (27% vs 24%, respectively). Conclusion: Cetuximab activity in NSCLC patient-derived xenograft models was demonstrated clearly only in tumors that expressed high levels of EGFR, as defined by an immunohistochemistry score of ≥200.

19 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: These ESMO consensus guidelines have been developed based on the current available evidence to provide a series of evidence-based recommendations to assist in the treatment and management of patients with mCRC in this rapidly evolving treatment setting.

2,382 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Additional RAS mutations predicted a lack of response in patients who received panitumumab-FOLFOX4 treatment, which was consistent with the findings in patients with KRAS mutations in exon 2.
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer that harbors KRAS mutations in exon 2 do not benefit from anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapy. Other activating RAS mutations may also be negative predictive biomarkers for anti-EGFR therapy. METHODS: In this prospective-retrospective analysis, we assessed the efficacy and safety of panitumumab plus oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin (FOLFOX4) as compared with FOLFOX4 alone, according to RAS (KRAS or NRAS) or BRAF mutation status. A total of 639 patients who had metastatic colorectal cancer without KRAS mutations in exon 2 had results for at least one of the following: KRAS exon 3 or 4; NRAS exon 2, 3, or 4; or BRAF exon 15. The overall rate of ascertainment of RAS status was 90%. RESULTS: Among 512 patients without RAS mutations, progression-free survival was 10.1 months with panitumumab-FOLFOX4 versus 7.9 months with FOLFOX4 alone (hazard ratio for progression or death with combination therapy, 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.58 to 0.90; P = 0.004). Overall survival was 26.0 months in the panitumumab-FOLFOX4 group versus 20.2 months in the FOLFOX4-alone group (hazard ratio for death, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.62 to 0.99; P = 0.04). A total of 108 patients (17%) with non-mutated KRAS exon 2 had other RAS mutations. These mutations were associated with inferior progression-free survival and overall survival with panitumumab-FOLFOX4 treatment, which was consistent with the findings in patients with KRAS mutations in exon 2. BRAF mutations were a negative prognostic factor. No new safety signals were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Additional RAS mutations predicted a lack of response in patients who received panitumumab-FOLFOX4. In patients who had metastatic colorectal cancer without RAS mutations, improvements in overall survival were observed with panitumumab-FOLFOX4 therapy

1,929 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This Review outlines the fundamental strategies that are required to develop antibody therapies for cancer patients through iterative approaches to target and antibody selection, extending from preclinical studies to human trials.
Abstract: The use of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) for cancer therapy has achieved considerable success in recent years. Antibody-drug conjugates are powerful new treatment options for lymphomas and solid tumours, and immunomodulatory antibodies have also recently achieved remarkable clinical success. The development of therapeutic antibodies requires a deep understanding of cancer serology, protein-engineering techniques, mechanisms of action and resistance, and the interplay between the immune system and cancer cells. This Review outlines the fundamental strategies that are required to develop antibody therapies for cancer patients through iterative approaches to target and antibody selection, extending from preclinical studies to human trials.

1,788 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The addition of cetuximab to FOLFIRI as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) was shown to reduce the risk of disease progression and increase the chance of response in patients with KRAS wild-type disease.
Abstract: Purpose The addition of cetuximab to irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin (FOLFIRI) as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) was shown to reduce the risk of disease progression and increase the chance of response in patients with KRAS wild-type disease. An updated survival analysis, including additional patients analyzed for tumor mutation status, was undertaken. Patients and Methods Patients were randomly assigned to receive FOLFIRI with or without cetuximab. DNA was extracted from additional slide-mounted tumor samples previously used to assess epidermal growth factor receptor expression. Clinical outcome according to the tumor mutation status of KRAS and BRAF was assessed in the expanded patient series. Results The ascertainment rate of patients analyzed for tumor KRAS status was increased from 45% to 89%, with mutations detected in 37% of tumors. The addition of cetuximab to FOLFIRI in patients with KRAS wild-type disease resulted in significant improvements in overall survival (median, 23.5 v 20.0 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.796; P .0093), progression-free survival (median, 9.9 v 8.4 months; HR, 0.696; P .0012), and response (rate 57.3% v 39.7%; odds ratio, 2.069; P .001) compared with FOLFIRI alone. Significant interactions between KRAS status and treatment effect were noted for all key efficacy end points. KRAS mutation status was confirmed as a powerful predictive biomarker for the efficacy of cetuximab plus FOLFIRI. BRAF tumor mutation was a strong indicator of poor prognosis. Conclusion The addition of cetuximab to FOLFIRI as first-line therapy improves survival in patients with KRAS wild-type mCRC. BRAF tumor mutation is an indicator of poor prognosis.

1,744 citations