scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Claudio V. Mello

Bio: Claudio V. Mello is an academic researcher from Oregon Health & Science University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Zebra finch & Vocal learning. The author has an hindex of 45, co-authored 123 publications receiving 11137 citations. Previous affiliations of Claudio V. Mello include University of Brasília & Duke University.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Erich D. Jarvis1, Siavash Mirarab2, Andre J. Aberer3, Bo Li4, Bo Li5, Bo Li6, Peter Houde7, Cai Li6, Cai Li4, Simon Y. W. Ho8, Brant C. Faircloth9, Benoit Nabholz, Jason T. Howard1, Alexander Suh10, Claudia C. Weber10, Rute R. da Fonseca11, Jianwen Li, Fang Zhang Zhang, Hui Li, Long Zhou, Nitish Narula7, Nitish Narula12, Liang Liu13, Ganesh Ganapathy1, Bastien Boussau, Shamsuzzoha Bayzid2, Volodymyr Zavidovych1, Sankar Subramanian14, Toni Gabaldón15, Salvador Capella-Gutierrez, Jaime Huerta-Cepas, Bhanu Rekepalli16, Bhanu Rekepalli17, Kasper Munch18, Mikkel H. Schierup18, Bent E. K. Lindow11, Wesley C. Warren19, David A. Ray, Richard E. Green20, Michael William Bruford21, Xiangjiang Zhan21, Xiangjiang Zhan22, Andrew Dixon, Shengbin Li5, Ning Li23, Yinhua Huang23, Elizabeth P. Derryberry24, Elizabeth P. Derryberry25, Mads F. Bertelsen26, Frederick H. Sheldon25, Robb T. Brumfield25, Claudio V. Mello27, Claudio V. Mello28, Peter V. Lovell28, Morgan Wirthlin28, Maria Paula Cruz Schneider27, Francisco Prosdocimi27, José Alfredo Samaniego11, Amhed Missael Vargas Velazquez11, Alonzo Alfaro-Núñez11, Paula F. Campos11, Bent O. Petersen29, Thomas Sicheritz-Pontén29, An Pas, Thomas L. Bailey, R. Paul Scofield30, Michael Bunce31, David M. Lambert14, Qi Zhou, Polina L. Perelman32, Amy C. Driskell33, Beth Shapiro20, Zijun Xiong, Yongli Zeng, Shiping Liu, Zhenyu Li, Binghang Liu, Kui Wu, Jin Xiao, Xiong Yinqi, Quiemei Zheng, Yong Zhang, Huanming Yang, Jian Wang, Linnéa Smeds10, Frank E. Rheindt34, Michael J. Braun35, Jon Fjeldså11, Ludovic Orlando11, F. Keith Barker4, Knud A. Jønsson4, Warren E. Johnson33, Klaus-Peter Koepfli33, Stephen J. O'Brien36, David Haussler, Oliver A. Ryder, Carsten Rahbek4, Eske Willerslev11, Gary R. Graves33, Gary R. Graves4, Travis C. Glenn13, John E. McCormack37, Dave Burt38, Hans Ellegren10, Per Alström, Scott V. Edwards39, Alexandros Stamatakis3, David P. Mindell40, Joel Cracraft4, Edward L. Braun41, Tandy Warnow42, Tandy Warnow2, Wang Jun, M. Thomas P. Gilbert4, M. Thomas P. Gilbert31, Guojie Zhang6, Guojie Zhang11 
12 Dec 2014-Science
TL;DR: A genome-scale phylogenetic analysis of 48 species representing all orders of Neoaves recovered a highly resolved tree that confirms previously controversial sister or close relationships and identifies the first divergence in Neoaves, two groups the authors named Passerea and Columbea.
Abstract: To better determine the history of modern birds, we performed a genome-scale phylogenetic analysis of 48 species representing all orders of Neoaves using phylogenomic methods created to handle genome-scale data. We recovered a highly resolved tree that confirms previously controversial sister or close relationships. We identified the first divergence in Neoaves, two groups we named Passerea and Columbea, representing independent lineages of diverse and convergently evolved land and water bird species. Among Passerea, we infer the common ancestor of core landbirds to have been an apex predator and confirm independent gains of vocal learning. Among Columbea, we identify pigeons and flamingoes as belonging to sister clades. Even with whole genomes, some of the earliest branches in Neoaves proved challenging to resolve, which was best explained by massive protein-coding sequence convergence and high levels of incomplete lineage sorting that occurred during a rapid radiation after the Cretaceous-Paleogene mass extinction event about 66 million years ago.

1,624 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The standard nomenclature that has been used for many telencephalic and related brainstem structures in birds is reviewed, with a rationale for each name change and evidence for any homologies implied by the new names.
Abstract: The standard nomenclature that has been used for many telencephalic and related brainstem structures in birds is based on flawed assumptions of homology to mammals. In particular, the outdated terminology implies that most of the avian telencephalon is a hypertrophied basal ganglia, when it is now clear that most of the avian telencephalon is neurochemically, hodologically, and functionally comparable to the mammalian neocortex, claustrum, and pallial amygdala (all of which derive from the pallial sector of the developing telencephalon). Recognizing that this promotes misunderstanding of the functional organization of avian brains and their evolutionary relationship to mammalian brains, avian brain specialists began discussions to rectify this problem, culminating in the Avian Brain Nomenclature Forum held at Duke University in July 2002, which approved a new terminology for avian telencephalon and some allied brainstem cell groups. Details of this new terminology are presented here, as is a rationale for each name change and evidence for any homologies implied by the new names. Revisions for the brainstem focused on vocal control, catecholaminergic, cholinergic, and basal ganglia-related nuclei. For example, the Forum recognized that the hypoglossal nucleus had been incorrectly identified as the nucleus intermedius in the Karten and Hodos (1967) pigeon brain atlas, and what was identified as the hypoglossal nucleus in that atlas should instead be called the supraspinal nucleus. The locus ceruleus of this and other avian atlases was noted to consist of a caudal noradrenergic part homologous to the mammalian locus coeruleus and a rostral region corresponding to the mammalian A8 dopaminergic cell group. The midbrain dopaminergic cell group in birds known as the nucleus tegmenti pedunculopontinus pars compacta was recognized as homologous to the mammalian substantia nigra pars compacta and was renamed accordingly; a group of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)ergic neurons at the lateral edge of this region was identified as homologous to the mammalian substantia nigra pars reticulata and was also renamed accordingly. A field of cholinergic neurons in the rostral avian hindbrain was named the nucleus pedunculopontinus tegmenti, whereas the anterior nucleus of the ansa lenticularis in the avian diencephalon was renamed the subthalamic nucleus, both for their evident mammalian homologues. For the basal (i.e., subpallial) telencephalon, the actual parts of the basal ganglia were given names reflecting their now evident homologues. For example, the lobus parolfactorius and paleostriatum augmentatum were acknowledged to make up the dorsal subdivision of the striatal part of the basal ganglia and were renamed as the medial and lateral striatum. The paleostriatum primitivum was recognized as homologous to the mammalian globus pallidus and renamed as such. Additionally, the rostroventral part of what was called the lobus parolfactorius was acknowledged as comparable to the mammalian nucleus accumbens, which, together with the olfactory tubercle, was noted to be part of the ventral striatum in birds. A ventral pallidum, a basal cholinergic cell group, and medial and lateral bed nuclei of the stria terminalis were also recognized. The dorsal (i.e., pallial) telencephalic regions that had been erroneously named to reflect presumed homology to striatal parts of mammalian basal ganglia were renamed as part of the pallium, using prefixes that retain most established abbreviations, to maintain continuity with the outdated nomenclature. We concluded, however, that one-to-one (i.e., discrete) homologies with mammals are still uncertain for most of the telencephalic pallium in birds and thus the new pallial terminology is largely devoid of assumptions of one-to-one homologies with mammals. The sectors of the hyperstriatum composing the Wulst (i.e., the hyperstriatum accessorium intermedium, and dorsale), the hyperstriatum ventrale, the neostriatum, and the archistriatum have been renamed (respectively) the hyperpallium (hypertrophied pallium), the mesopallium (middle pallium), the nidopallium (nest pallium), and the arcopallium (arched pallium). The posterior part of the archistriatum has been renamed the posterior pallial amygdala, the nucleus taeniae recognized as part of the avian amygdala, and a region inferior to the posterior paleostriatum primitivum included as a subpallial part of the avian amygdala. The names of some of the laminae and fiber tracts were also changed to reflect current understanding of the location of pallial and subpallial sectors of the avian telencephalon. Notably, the lamina medularis dorsalis has been renamed the pallial-subpallial lamina. We urge all to use this new terminology, because we believe it will promote better communication among neuroscientists. Further information is available at http://avianbrain.org

1,061 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: An international consortium of neuroscientists has reconsidered the traditional, 100-year-old terminology that is used to describe the avian cerebrum, requiring a new terminology that better reflects these functions and the homologies between avian and mammalian brains.
Abstract: We believe that names have a powerful influence on the experiments we do and the way in which we think. For this reason, and in the light of new evidence about the function and evolution of the vertebrate brain, an international consortium of neuroscientists has reconsidered the traditional, 100-year-old terminology that is used to describe the avian cerebrum. Our current understanding of the avian brain - in particular the neocortex-like cognitive functions of the avian pallium - requires a new terminology that better reflects these functions and the homologies between avian and mammalian brains.

850 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Apr 2010-Nature
TL;DR: This work shows that song behaviour engages gene regulatory networks in the zebra finch brain, altering the expression of long non-coding RNAs, microRNAs, transcription factors and their targets and shows evidence for rapid molecular evolution in the songbird lineage of genes that are regulated during song experience.
Abstract: The zebra finch is an important model organism in several fields with unique relevance to human neuroscience. Like other songbirds, the zebra finch communicates through learned vocalizations, an ability otherwise documented only in humans and a few other animals and lacking in the chicken-the only bird with a sequenced genome until now. Here we present a structural, functional and comparative analysis of the genome sequence of the zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata), which is a songbird belonging to the large avian order Passeriformes. We find that the overall structures of the genomes are similar in zebra finch and chicken, but they differ in many intrachromosomal rearrangements, lineage-specific gene family expansions, the number of long-terminal-repeat-based retrotransposons, and mechanisms of sex chromosome dosage compensation. We show that song behaviour engages gene regulatory networks in the zebra finch brain, altering the expression of long non-coding RNAs, microRNAs, transcription factors and their targets. We also show evidence for rapid molecular evolution in the songbird lineage of genes that are regulated during song experience. These results indicate an active involvement of the genome in neural processes underlying vocal communication and identify potential genetic substrates for the evolution and regulation of this behaviour.

837 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Arang Rhie1, Shane A. McCarthy2, Shane A. McCarthy3, Olivier Fedrigo4, Joana Damas5, Giulio Formenti4, Sergey Koren1, Marcela Uliano-Silva6, William Chow3, Arkarachai Fungtammasan, J. H. Kim7, Chul Hee Lee7, Byung June Ko7, Mark Chaisson8, Gregory Gedman4, Lindsey J. Cantin4, Françoise Thibaud-Nissen1, Leanne Haggerty9, Iliana Bista3, Iliana Bista2, Michelle Smith3, Bettina Haase4, Jacquelyn Mountcastle4, Sylke Winkler10, Sylke Winkler11, Sadye Paez4, Jason T. Howard, Sonja C. Vernes12, Sonja C. Vernes13, Sonja C. Vernes10, Tanya M. Lama14, Frank Grützner15, Wesley C. Warren16, Christopher N. Balakrishnan17, Dave W Burt18, Jimin George19, Matthew T. Biegler4, David Iorns, Andrew Digby, Daryl Eason, Bruce C. Robertson20, Taylor Edwards21, Mark Wilkinson22, George F. Turner23, Axel Meyer24, Andreas F. Kautt24, Andreas F. Kautt25, Paolo Franchini24, H. William Detrich26, Hannes Svardal27, Hannes Svardal28, Maximilian Wagner29, Gavin J. P. Naylor30, Martin Pippel10, Milan Malinsky31, Milan Malinsky3, Mark Mooney, Maria Simbirsky, Brett T. Hannigan, Trevor Pesout32, Marlys L. Houck33, Ann C Misuraca33, Sarah B. Kingan34, Richard Hall34, Zev N. Kronenberg34, Ivan Sović34, Christopher Dunn34, Zemin Ning3, Alex Hastie, Joyce V. Lee, Siddarth Selvaraj, Richard E. Green32, Nicholas H. Putnam, Ivo Gut35, Jay Ghurye36, Erik Garrison32, Ying Sims3, Joanna Collins3, Sarah Pelan3, James Torrance3, Alan Tracey3, Jonathan Wood3, Robel E. Dagnew8, Dengfeng Guan2, Dengfeng Guan37, Sarah E. London38, David F. Clayton19, Claudio V. Mello39, Samantha R. Friedrich39, Peter V. Lovell39, Ekaterina Osipova10, Farooq O. Al-Ajli40, Farooq O. Al-Ajli41, Simona Secomandi42, Heebal Kim7, Constantina Theofanopoulou4, Michael Hiller43, Yang Zhou, Robert S. Harris44, Kateryna D. Makova44, Paul Medvedev44, Jinna Hoffman1, Patrick Masterson1, Karen Clark1, Fergal J. Martin9, Kevin L. Howe9, Paul Flicek9, Brian P. Walenz1, Woori Kwak, Hiram Clawson32, Mark Diekhans32, Luis R Nassar32, Benedict Paten32, Robert H. S. Kraus24, Robert H. S. Kraus10, Andrew J. Crawford45, M. Thomas P. Gilbert46, M. Thomas P. Gilbert47, Guojie Zhang, Byrappa Venkatesh48, Robert W. Murphy49, Klaus-Peter Koepfli50, Beth Shapiro51, Beth Shapiro32, Warren E. Johnson52, Warren E. Johnson50, Federica Di Palma53, Tomas Marques-Bonet, Emma C. Teeling54, Tandy Warnow55, Jennifer A. Marshall Graves56, Oliver A. Ryder33, Oliver A. Ryder57, David Haussler32, Stephen J. O'Brien58, Jonas Korlach34, Harris A. Lewin5, Kerstin Howe3, Eugene W. Myers11, Eugene W. Myers10, Richard Durbin3, Richard Durbin2, Adam M. Phillippy1, Erich D. Jarvis51, Erich D. Jarvis4 
National Institutes of Health1, University of Cambridge2, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute3, Rockefeller University4, University of California, Davis5, Leibniz Association6, Seoul National University7, University of Southern California8, European Bioinformatics Institute9, Max Planck Society10, Dresden University of Technology11, University of St Andrews12, Radboud University Nijmegen13, University of Massachusetts Amherst14, University of Adelaide15, University of Missouri16, East Carolina University17, University of Queensland18, Clemson University19, University of Otago20, University of Arizona21, Natural History Museum22, Bangor University23, University of Konstanz24, Harvard University25, Northeastern University26, National Museum of Natural History27, University of Antwerp28, University of Graz29, University of Florida30, University of Basel31, University of California, Santa Cruz32, Zoological Society of San Diego33, Pacific Biosciences34, Pompeu Fabra University35, University of Maryland, College Park36, Harbin Institute of Technology37, University of Chicago38, Oregon Health & Science University39, Qatar Airways40, Monash University Malaysia Campus41, University of Milan42, Goethe University Frankfurt43, Pennsylvania State University44, University of Los Andes45, Norwegian University of Science and Technology46, University of Copenhagen47, Agency for Science, Technology and Research48, Royal Ontario Museum49, Smithsonian Institution50, Howard Hughes Medical Institute51, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research52, University of East Anglia53, University College Dublin54, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign55, La Trobe University56, University of California, San Diego57, Nova Southeastern University58
28 Apr 2021-Nature
TL;DR: The Vertebrate Genomes Project (VGP) as mentioned in this paper is an international effort to generate high quality, complete reference genomes for all of the roughly 70,000 extant vertebrate species and to help to enable a new era of discovery across the life sciences.
Abstract: High-quality and complete reference genome assemblies are fundamental for the application of genomics to biology, disease, and biodiversity conservation. However, such assemblies are available for only a few non-microbial species1-4. To address this issue, the international Genome 10K (G10K) consortium5,6 has worked over a five-year period to evaluate and develop cost-effective methods for assembling highly accurate and nearly complete reference genomes. Here we present lessons learned from generating assemblies for 16 species that represent six major vertebrate lineages. We confirm that long-read sequencing technologies are essential for maximizing genome quality, and that unresolved complex repeats and haplotype heterozygosity are major sources of assembly error when not handled correctly. Our assemblies correct substantial errors, add missing sequence in some of the best historical reference genomes, and reveal biological discoveries. These include the identification of many false gene duplications, increases in gene sizes, chromosome rearrangements that are specific to lineages, a repeated independent chromosome breakpoint in bat genomes, and a canonical GC-rich pattern in protein-coding genes and their regulatory regions. Adopting these lessons, we have embarked on the Vertebrate Genomes Project (VGP), an international effort to generate high-quality, complete reference genomes for all of the roughly 70,000 extant vertebrate species and to help to enable a new era of discovery across the life sciences.

647 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The approach to utilizing available RNA-Seq and other data types in the authors' manual curation process for vertebrate, plant, and other species is summarized, and a new direction for prokaryotic genomes and protein name management is described.
Abstract: The RefSeq project at the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) maintains and curates a publicly available database of annotated genomic, transcript, and protein sequence records (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/refseq/). The RefSeq project leverages the data submitted to the International Nucleotide Sequence Database Collaboration (INSDC) against a combination of computation, manual curation, and collaboration to produce a standard set of stable, non-redundant reference sequences. The RefSeq project augments these reference sequences with current knowledge including publications, functional features and informative nomenclature. The database currently represents sequences from more than 55,000 organisms (>4800 viruses, >40,000 prokaryotes and >10,000 eukaryotes; RefSeq release 71), ranging from a single record to complete genomes. This paper summarizes the current status of the viral, prokaryotic, and eukaryotic branches of the RefSeq project, reports on improvements to data access and details efforts to further expand the taxonomic representation of the collection. We also highlight diverse functional curation initiatives that support multiple uses of RefSeq data including taxonomic validation, genome annotation, comparative genomics, and clinical testing. We summarize our approach to utilizing available RNA-Seq and other data types in our manual curation process for vertebrate, plant, and other species, and describe a new direction for prokaryotic genomes and protein name management.

4,104 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: PartitionFinder 2 is a program for automatically selecting best-fit partitioning schemes and models of evolution for phylogenetic analyses that includes the ability to analyze morphological datasets, new methods to analyze genome-scale datasets, and new output formats to facilitate interoperability with downstream software.
Abstract: PartitionFinder 2 is a program for automatically selecting best-fit partitioning schemes and models of evolution for phylogenetic analyses. PartitionFinder 2 is substantially faster and more efficient than version 1, and incorporates many new methods and features. These include the ability to analyze morphological datasets, new methods to analyze genome-scale datasets, new output formats to facilitate interoperability with downstream software, and many new models of molecular evolution. PartitionFinder 2 is freely available under an open source license and works on Windows, OSX, and Linux operating systems. It can be downloaded from www.robertlanfear.com/partitionfinder. The source code is available at https://github.com/brettc/partitionfinder.

3,445 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Sleep has been identified as a state that optimizes the consolidation of newly acquired information in memory, depending on the specific conditions of learning and the timing of sleep, through specific patterns of neuromodulatory activity and electric field potential oscillations.
Abstract: Sleep improves the consolidation of both declarative and non-declarative memories. Diekelmann and Born discuss the potential mechanisms through which slow wave sleep and rapid eye movement sleep support system and synaptic consolidation. Sleep has been identified as a state that optimizes the consolidation of newly acquired information in memory, depending on the specific conditions of learning and the timing of sleep. Consolidation during sleep promotes both quantitative and qualitative changes of memory representations. Through specific patterns of neuromodulatory activity and electric field potential oscillations, slow-wave sleep (SWS) and rapid eye movement (REM) sleep support system consolidation and synaptic consolidation, respectively. During SWS, slow oscillations, spindles and ripples — at minimum cholinergic activity — coordinate the re-activation and redistribution of hippocampus-dependent memories to neocortical sites, whereas during REM sleep, local increases in plasticity-related immediate-early gene activity — at high cholinergic and theta activity — might favour the subsequent synaptic consolidation of memories in the cortex.

2,983 citations

Journal Article
TL;DR: In this paper, a test based on two conserved CHD (chromo-helicase-DNA-binding) genes that are located on the avian sex chromosomes of all birds, with the possible exception of the ratites (ostriches, etc.).

2,554 citations

01 Jan 2011
TL;DR: The sheer volume and scope of data posed by this flood of data pose a significant challenge to the development of efficient and intuitive visualization tools able to scale to very large data sets and to flexibly integrate multiple data types, including clinical data.
Abstract: Rapid improvements in sequencing and array-based platforms are resulting in a flood of diverse genome-wide data, including data from exome and whole-genome sequencing, epigenetic surveys, expression profiling of coding and noncoding RNAs, single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) and copy number profiling, and functional assays. Analysis of these large, diverse data sets holds the promise of a more comprehensive understanding of the genome and its relation to human disease. Experienced and knowledgeable human review is an essential component of this process, complementing computational approaches. This calls for efficient and intuitive visualization tools able to scale to very large data sets and to flexibly integrate multiple data types, including clinical data. However, the sheer volume and scope of data pose a significant challenge to the development of such tools.

2,187 citations