Concetta Elisa Onesti

Bio: Concetta Elisa Onesti is an academic researcher from University of Liège. The author has contributed to research in topics: Medicine & Cancer. The author has an hindex of 13, co-authored 41 publications receiving 467 citations. Previous affiliations of Concetta Elisa Onesti include Sapienza University of Rome.

The Use of Bevacizumab in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: An Update

Abstract: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide, with approximately 1.2 million deaths annually. The standard-of-care in patients with advanced disease is platinum-based doublet chemotherapy. Recent advances in the understanding of biological mechanisms of tumor growth have allowed for identification of some molecular targets for cancer treatment, such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). VEGF is a pro-angiogenetic factor, which binds membrane receptors, and whose intra-cytoplasmatic domain presents tyrosine kinase activity. Pathological angiogenesis promotes tumor growth and metastasis. Targeted action against angiogenesis can lead to regression or normalization of neovascular structures and to inhibition of new blood vessel growth. The most commonly used mechanism is mediated by bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody that selectively binds to VEGF and prevents interaction with its receptor. Currently bevacizumab is the only anti-angiogenic agent approved for the first-line treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in selected patients. In the present review, we discuss the most important trials that demonstrate the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab. We also present an overview of the types of patients eligible for this treatment and a cost-effectiveness analysis. In conclusion, the possibility of administering a treatment with bevacizumab must be carefully analyzed case by case. It is important to identify those patients who can really benefit from the use of this drug, through the identification of specific response markers.

The sexist behaviour of immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer therapy

Abstract: // Andrea Botticelli 1, 2 , Concetta Elisa Onesti 1, 2 , Ilaria Zizzari 3 , Bruna Cerbelli 4 , Paolo Sciattella 5 , Mario Occhipinti 1 , Michela Roberto 1, 2 , Francesca Di Pietro 1, 2 , Adriana Bonifacino 6 , Michele Ghidini 7 , Patrizia Vici 8 , Laura Pizzuti 8 , Chiara Napoletano 3 , Lidia Strigari 9 , Giulia D’Amati 4 , Federica Mazzuca 1, 2 , Marianna Nuti 3 and Paolo Marchetti 1, 2 1 Medical Oncology Department, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy 2 Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Rome, Italy 3 Department of Experimental Medicine, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Rome, Italy 4 Department of Radiological Oncological and Pathological Sciences, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Rome, Italy 5 Statistical Department, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Rome, Italy 6 Breast Diagnosis and Treatment Unit, Sant’Andrea Hospital, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Rome, Italy 7 Oncology Unit, ASST Cremona, Cremona, Italy 8 Division of Medical Oncology 2, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy 9 Laboratory of Medical Physics and Expert Systems, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy Correspondence to: Concetta Elisa Onesti, email: elisaonesti@gmail.com Keywords: immune checkpoint inhibitors; anti-CTLA-4; anti-PD-1; sex differences; gender differences; Immunology Received: July 28, 2017 Accepted: October 10, 2017 Published: November 01, 2017 ABSTRACT Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors, targeting the molecules CTLA-4, PD-1 and PD-L1, showed efficacy against several type of cancers and are currently used in clinical practice. An important biological variable that influences innate and adaptive immunity is the sex, acting through genetic, hormonal and environmental factors. The overall differences between sexes could be crucial to evaluate the response to ICIs. Materials and methods : We performed a meta-analysis of Phase II-III Clinical Trials published up to June 2017 in which anti-CTLA-4, anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 were studied. We extracted the OS and PFS HR differentiated by sex from subgroups analysis of each trial. We analyzed the three classes of drugs separately. Results: We selected 36 Phase II-III Clinical Trials, 9 of which reported results for OS and 6 for PFS. We analyzed 2 Clinical Trials for OS with anti-CTLA-4, including 1178 patients, observing a benefit for males vs females (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.55-0.77 vs HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.65-0.96, p 0.078). Not statistically significant results were observed with anti-PD-1 neither for OS (males vs females: HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.64-0.83 vs HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.70-0.94, p 0.285) neither for PFS (males vs females: HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.52-0.82 vs HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.66-1.09, p 0.158). We cannot perform a meta-analysis for anti-PD-L1 due to the lack of data. Conclusions: Different mechanisms could be involved in sex differences with regard to immunotherapy. These differences could be relevant to identify immunological targets in order to draw studies exploring novel combinations of immunotherapy agents.

Lean body mass wasting and toxicity in early breast cancer patients receiving anthracyclines

Abstract: // Federica Mazzuca 1, 2 , Concetta Elisa Onesti 1, 3 , Michela Roberto 1, 2 , Marco Di Girolamo 4 , Andrea Botticelli 1 , Paola Begini 5 , Lidia Strigari 6 , Paolo Marchetti 1, 2 and Maurizio Muscaritoli 7 1 Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Rome, Italy 2 Department of Medical Oncology, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy 3 Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital (CHU) and University of Liege, Liege, Belgium 4 Department of Radiology, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy 5 Department of Gastroenterology, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy 6 Laboratory of Medical Physics and Expert Systems, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy 7 Department of Clinical Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy Correspondence to: Concetta Elisa Onesti, email: elisaonesti@gmail.com Keywords: breast cancer; sarcopenia; lean body mass; anthracyclines toxicity; adjuvant chemotherapy Received: February 12, 2018 Accepted: April 28, 2018 Published: May 22, 2018 ABSTRACT Background: Sarcopenia refers to the reduction of both volume and number of skeletal muscle fibers. Lean body mass loss is associated with survival, quality of life and tolerance to treatment in cancer patients. The aim of our study is to analyse the association between toxicities and sarcopenia in early breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant treatment. Materials and Methods: Breast cancer patients who have received anthracycline-based adjuvant treatment were retrospectively enrolled. CT scan images performed before, during and after adjuvant chemotherapy were used to evaluate lean body mass at third lumbar vertebra level with the software Slice Omatic V 5.0. Results: 21 stage I–III breast cancer patients were enrolled. According to the skeletal muscle index at third lumbar vertebra cut-off ≤38.5 cm 2 /m 2 , 8 patients (38.1%) were classified as sarcopenic before starting treatment, while 10 patients (47.6%) were sarcopenic at the end of treatment. A lower baseline L3 skeletal muscle index is associated with G3-4 vs G0-2 toxicities (33.4 cm 2 /m 2 (31.1–39.9) vs 40.5 cm 2 /m 2 (33.4–52.0), p = 0.028). Similarly skeletal muscle cross sectional area was significantly lower in patients with G3-4 toxicities (86.7 cm 2 (82.6–104.7) vs 109.0 cm 2 (83.3–143.9), p = 0.017). L3 skeletal muscle index is an independent predictor of severe toxicity ( p = 0.0282) in multivariate analysis. Conclusion: Lean body mass loss is associated with higher grade of toxicity in early breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy.

Expected Medium- and Long-Term Impact of the COVID-19 Outbreak in Oncology.

Abstract: PURPOSEThe COVID-19 pandemic has affected healthcare systems globally, leading to reorganization of medical activities. We performed an international survey aimed to investigate the medium- and lon...

Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study

Abstract: Summary Background Since December, 2019, Wuhan, China, has experienced an outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of patients with COVID-19 have been reported but risk factors for mortality and a detailed clinical course of illness, including viral shedding, have not been well described. Methods In this retrospective, multicentre cohort study, we included all adult inpatients (≥18 years old) with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 from Jinyintan Hospital and Wuhan Pulmonary Hospital (Wuhan, China) who had been discharged or had died by Jan 31, 2020. Demographic, clinical, treatment, and laboratory data, including serial samples for viral RNA detection, were extracted from electronic medical records and compared between survivors and non-survivors. We used univariable and multivariable logistic regression methods to explore the risk factors associated with in-hospital death. Findings 191 patients (135 from Jinyintan Hospital and 56 from Wuhan Pulmonary Hospital) were included in this study, of whom 137 were discharged and 54 died in hospital. 91 (48%) patients had a comorbidity, with hypertension being the most common (58 [30%] patients), followed by diabetes (36 [19%] patients) and coronary heart disease (15 [8%] patients). Multivariable regression showed increasing odds of in-hospital death associated with older age (odds ratio 1·10, 95% CI 1·03–1·17, per year increase; p=0·0043), higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score (5·65, 2·61–12·23; p Interpretation The potential risk factors of older age, high SOFA score, and d-dimer greater than 1 μg/mL could help clinicians to identify patients with poor prognosis at an early stage. Prolonged viral shedding provides the rationale for a strategy of isolation of infected patients and optimal antiviral interventions in the future. Funding Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences; National Science Grant for Distinguished Young Scholars; National Key Research and Development Program of China; The Beijing Science and Technology Project; and Major Projects of National Science and Technology on New Drug Creation and Development.

Cancer immunotherapy efficacy and patients' sex: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Abstract: Summary Background Despite the acknowledged sex-related dimorphism in immune system response, little is known about the effect of patients' sex on the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors as cancer treatments. We did a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the heterogeneity of immune checkpoint inhibitor efficacy between men and women. Methods We systematically searched PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus, from database inception to Nov 30, 2017, for randomised controlled trials of immune checkpoint inhibitors (inhibitors of PD-1, CTLA-4, or both) that had available hazard ratios (HRs) for death according to patients' sex. We also reviewed abstracts and presentations from all major conference proceedings. We excluded non-randomised trials and considered only papers published in English. The primary endpoint was to assess the difference in efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors between men and women, measured in terms of the difference in overall survival log(HR) reported in male and female study participants. We calculated the pooled overall survival HR and 95% CI in men and women using a random-effects model, and assessed the heterogeneity between the two estimates using an interaction test. Findings Of 7133 studies identified in our search, there were 20 eligible randomised controlled trials of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ipilimumab, tremelimumab, nivolumab, or pembrolizumab) that reported overall survival according to patients' sex. Overall, 11 351 patients with advanced or metastatic cancers (7646 [67%] men and 3705 [33%] women) were included in the analysis; the most common types of cancer were melanoma (3632 [32%]) and non-small-cell lung cancer (3482 [31%]). The pooled overall survival HR was 0·72 (95% CI 0·65–0·79) in male patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors, compared with men treated in control groups. In women treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors, the pooled overall survival HR compared with control groups was 0·86 (95% CI 0·79–0·93). The difference in efficacy between men and women treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors was significant (p=0·0019). Interpretation Immune checkpoint inhibitors can improve overall survival for patients with advanced cancers such as melanoma and non-small-cell lung cancer, but the magnitude of benefit is sex-dependent. Future research should guarantee greater inclusion of women in trials and focus on improving the effectiveness of immunotherapies in women, perhaps exploring different immunotherapeutic approaches in men and women. Funding None.