scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Courtney H. Coschi

Bio: Courtney H. Coschi is an academic researcher. The author has contributed to research in topics: Immunotherapy & Cancer immunotherapy. The author has co-authored 1 publications.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, a review of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) including their mechanisms of action, usage, associated adverse events, and their management is presented, showing that most patients with low grade irAEs are eligible for rechallenge with ICIs, and the use of corticosteroids to address an irAE is not associated with poorer patient outcomes.
Abstract: Cancer immunotherapy has the goal of enhancing a patient’s intrinsic immune processes in order to mount a successful immune response against tumor cells. Cancer cells actively employ tactics to evade, delay, alter, or attenuate the anti-tumor immune response. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) modulate endogenous regulatory immune mechanisms to enhance immune system activation, and have become the mainstay of therapy in many cancer types. This activation occurs broadly and as a result, activation is supraphysiologic and relatively non-specific, which can lead to immune-related adverse events (irAEs), the frequency of which depends on the patient, the cancer type, and the specific ICI antibody. Careful assessment of patients for irAEs through history taking, physical exam, and routine laboratory assessments are key to identifying irAEs at early stages, when they can potentially be managed more easily and before progressing to higher grades or more serious effects. Generally, most patients with low grade irAEs are eligible for re-challenge with ICIs, and the use of corticosteroids to address an irAE is not associated with poorer patient outcomes. This paper reviews immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) including their mechanisms of action, usage, associated irAEs, and their management.

3 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The aim of this review is to summarize known orofacial irAEs and to familiarize oral healthcare providers with how to identify and manage these toxicities as part of the care team for patients treated with ICIs.
Abstract: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are a revolutionary class of antineoplastic therapy that restore anti-tumor immunity. Consequences of this enhanced immune response include a multitude of immune related adverse events (irAEs) that can affect any body system, including the mouth. Orofacial irAEs reproduce features of numerous immune-mediated conditions, including oral lichen planus, mucous membrane pemphigoid, and Sjögren syndrome, among others. The aim of this review is to summarize known orofacial irAEs and to familiarize oral healthcare providers with how to identify and manage these toxicities as part of the care team for patients treated with ICIs.

3 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Favorable functional outcomes are closely linked to early recognition and aggressive treatment of these complications considering the fact that these immune-related adverse events affect multiple organ systems and have an untreated lethality of up to 3%.
Abstract: BACKGROUND The recently introduced tumor therapies including immune checkpoint and BRAF/MEK inhibitors (ICI) have substantially contributed to survival and quality of life of the affected patients, but are associated with class-specific, non-toxic immune-related side effects including uveitis. This narrative review focusses to summarize the immune-related adverse event profile associated with the use of ICI. METHODS A literature search in PubMed, the publication database of the National Institute of Health in the USA (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed) used the search terms "uveitis" AND "drug-induced" AND/OR "immune checkpoint inhibitor". All articles published in the last five years and the for the purpose of this review relevant cross references were evaluated. RESULTS A class-specific phenomenon of ICI and BRAF/MEK inhibitors is their capability to induce systemic and ocular autoimmunity. Ocular side effects are observed in up to 3% of patients and should be differentiated from toxic side effects, since this is not dose-dependent. Melanoma as underlying disease and Pembrolizumab as ICI significantly increase the risk. If timely recognized, systemic treatment with corticosteroids allows to preserve vision without cessation of the tumor treatment in more than 90% of these potentially life-threatening instances. CONCLUSION Given their impact onto the survival of cancer and namely melanoma patients, ICI and BRAF/MEK inhibitors are increasingly used alone and in combination, which enhances their inherent risk of developing drug-induced ocular autoimmunity. Favorable functional outcomes are closely linked to early recognition and aggressive treatment of these complications considering the fact that these immune-related adverse events affect multiple organ systems and have an untreated lethality of up to 3%.

3 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This paper aims to provide a context for future generations to consider the role of vaccination and how to protect against infectious disease in the context of healthcare and sport.
Abstract: Over these last two pandemic years, we have all experienced profound changes in how we practice, how we work, and how we live [...].