Author
Cyrus Cooper
Other affiliations: University of Oxford, University of York, University of Potsdam ...read more
Bio: Cyrus Cooper is an academic researcher from Southampton General Hospital. The author has contributed to research in topics: Population & Osteoporosis. The author has an hindex of 204, co-authored 1869 publications receiving 206782 citations. Previous affiliations of Cyrus Cooper include University of Oxford & University of York.
Topics: Population, Osteoporosis, Hip fracture, Cohort study, Bone density
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
TL;DR: Minimal joint space (i.e., the shortest distance between the femoral head margin and the acetabulum) was the index most strongly associated with other radiologic features of osteoarthritis, suggesting that, at least in men, minimal joint space is the best radiologic criterion for use in epidemiologic studies.
Abstract: The authors compared seven radiologic indices of hip osteoarthritis to establish which provided the best definition of the disease for epidemiologic purposes. Hip joints were assessed from intravenous urograms taken in a British hospital between 1982 and 1987 in 1,315 men aged 60-75 years. The indices examined were an overall qualitative grading of osteoarthritis, four measures of joint space, the maximum thickness of subchondral sclerosis, and the size of the largest osteophyte. Minimal joint space (i.e., the shortest distance between the femoral head margin and the acetabulum) was the index most strongly associated with other radiologic features of osteoarthritis. Among a subset of 759 men who answered a questionnaire about symptoms, the overall qualitative grading, minimal joint space, and thickness of subchondral sclerosis were the radiologic indices most predictive of hip pain. Within- and between-observer repeatability were tested in a subset of 50 subjects. Measures of joint space were more reproducible than other indices. These data suggest that, at least in men, minimal joint space is the best radiologic criterion of hip osteoarthritis for use in epidemiologic studies.
328 citations
••
University of Sheffield1, University of California, San Francisco2, Medical Research Council3, French Institute of Health and Medical Research4, Tufts University5, Erasmus University Rotterdam6, St. Vincent's Health System7, Stockholm School of Economics8, Mayo Clinic9, Leiden University10, University of Geneva11, University of Manchester12, McGill University13
TL;DR: A further challenge for the future will be to identify risk factors that predict fracture with high validity in different regions of the world and their independent contributions, so that models of risk prediction can be constructed and ultimately validated in independent cohorts.
Abstract: The diagnosis of osteoporosis is made from the measurement of BMD. DXA at the hip is the appropriate diagnostic site. Current clinical guidelines follow the principle that BMD measurements are indicated in individuals with risk factors for fracture and that treatment is recommended in those with a BMD below a critical value. In some countries reimbursement for the costs of treatment depend upon such thresholds for BMD. In Europe the critical value corresponds to a T-score of-2.5 SD, whereas in the USA less stringent criteria are used. It is evident, however, that fracture risk at any given T-score varies markedly according to age and other risk factors. This has led to the view that interventions should be targeted to those at high risk, irrespective of a fixed BMD threshold. In this sense, BMD is utlized as a risk assessment, since in many instances intervention thresholds will be less stringent than the diagnostic threshold. Thus, intervention thresholds need to differ from diagnostic thresholds and be based on fracture probabilities. A 10-year fracture probability appears to be an appropriate time frame. There are a number of problems to be overcome in the development of assessment guidelines. They need to take account of not only the risk of hip fracture but also that of other fractures which contribute significantly to morbidity, particularly in younger individuals. A promising approach is to weight fracture probabilities according to the disutility incurred compared with hip fracture probability. Account also needs to be taken of the large geographic variation in fracture probabilities worldwide. A further challenge for the future will be to identify risk factors that predict fracture with high validity in different regions of the world and their independent contributions, so that models of risk prediction can be constructed and ultimately validated in independent cohorts.
326 citations
••
TL;DR: Once‐monthly (50/50, 100, and 150 mg) and daily (2.5 mg; 3‐year vertebral fracture risk reduction: 52%) oral ibandronate regimens were compared in 1609 women with postmenopausal osteoporosis.
Abstract: Once-monthly (50/50, 100, and 150 mg) and daily (2.5 mg; 3-year vertebral fracture risk reduction: 52%) oral ibandronate regimens were compared in 1609 women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. At least equivalent efficacy and similar safety and tolerability were shown after 1 year. Introduction: Suboptimal adherence to daily and weekly oral bisphosphonates can potentially compromise therapeutic outcomes in postmenopausal osteoporosis. Although yet to be prospectively shown in osteoporosis, evidence from randomized clinical trials in several other chronic conditions shows that reducing dosing frequency enhances therapeutic adherence. Ibandronate is a new and potent bisphosphonate with antifracture efficacy proven for daily administration and also intermittent administration with a dose-free interval of >2 months. This report presents comparative data on the efficacy and safety of monthly and daily oral ibandronate regimens. Materials and Methods: MOBILE is a 2-year, randomized, double-blind, phase III, noninferiority trial. A total of 1609 women with postmenopausal osteoporosis were assigned to one of four oral ibandronate regimens: 2.5 mg daily, 50 mg/50 mg monthly (single doses, consecutive days), 100 mg monthly, or 150 mg monthly. Results: After 1 year, lumbar spine BMD increased by 3.9%, 4.3%, 4.1%, and 4.9% in the 2.5, 50 /50, 100, and 150 mg arms, respectively. All monthly regimens were proven noninferior, and the 150 mg regimen superior, to the daily regimen. All monthly regimens produced similar hip BMD gains, which were larger than those with the daily regimen. All regimens similarly decreased serum levels of C-telopeptide, a biochemical marker of bone resorption. Compared with the daily regimen, a significantly larger proportion of women receiving the 100 and 150 mg monthly regimens achieved predefined threshold levels for percent change from baseline in lumbar spine (6%) or total hip BMD (3%). All regimens were similarly well tolerated. Conclusions: Monthly ibandronate is at least as effective and well tolerated as the currently approved daily ibandronate regimen in postmenopausal osteoporosis.
325 citations
••
TL;DR: A UK Consensus Group on management of glucocorticoid‐induced osteoporosis: an update (Review).
Abstract: In the UK, over 250 000 patients take continuous oral glucocorticoids (GCs), yet no more than 14% receive any therapy to prevent bone loss, a major complication of GC treatment. Bone loss is rapid, particularly in the first year, and fracture risk may double. This review, based wherever possible on clinical evidence, aims to provide easy-to-use guidance with wide applicability. A treatment algorithm is presented for adults receiving GC doses of 7.5 mg day(-1) or more for 6 months or more. General measures, e.g. alternative GCs and routes of administration, and therapeutic interventions, e.g. cyclical etidronate and hormone replacement, are recommended.
321 citations
••
University of Reading1, UCL Institute of Child Health2, University of Tromsø3, German Cancer Research Center4, Boston University5, Imperial College London6, University of Oulu7, University of Groningen8, University of Helsinki9, Sahlgrenska University Hospital10, University College London11, King's College London12, George Washington University13, Wake Forest University14, University of Copenhagen15, Gentofte Hospital16, University of Exeter17, Trinity College, Dublin18, University of Edinburgh19, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich20, Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics21, University of Oxford22, Oulu University Hospital23, National Institutes of Health24, Finnish Institute of Occupational Health25, Heidelberg University26, University of Southampton27, Turku University Hospital28, University of Turku29, VU University Amsterdam30, Aarhus University Hospital31, University of Bristol32, Uppsala University33, Science for Life Laboratory34, University of Split35, Lund University36, Frederiksberg Hospital37, Harvard University38, University of Tampere39, Synlab Group40, Medical University of Graz41, Vanderbilt University42, GlaxoSmithKline43, University of South Australia44
TL;DR: In this article, the authors used a mendelian randomisation approach to test whether low plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) concentration is causally associated with blood pressure and hypertension risk.
320 citations
Cited by
More filters
•
28,685 citations
28 Jul 2005
TL;DR: PfPMP1)与感染红细胞、树突状组胞以及胎盘的单个或多个受体作用,在黏附及免疫逃避中起关键的作�ly.
Abstract: 抗原变异可使得多种致病微生物易于逃避宿主免疫应答。表达在感染红细胞表面的恶性疟原虫红细胞表面蛋白1(PfPMP1)与感染红细胞、内皮细胞、树突状细胞以及胎盘的单个或多个受体作用,在黏附及免疫逃避中起关键的作用。每个单倍体基因组var基因家族编码约60种成员,通过启动转录不同的var基因变异体为抗原变异提供了分子基础。
18,940 citations
01 Jan 2016
TL;DR: The using multivariate statistics is universally compatible with any devices to read, allowing you to get the most less latency time to download any of the authors' books like this one.
Abstract: Thank you for downloading using multivariate statistics. As you may know, people have look hundreds times for their favorite novels like this using multivariate statistics, but end up in infectious downloads. Rather than reading a good book with a cup of tea in the afternoon, instead they juggled with some harmful bugs inside their laptop. using multivariate statistics is available in our digital library an online access to it is set as public so you can download it instantly. Our books collection saves in multiple locations, allowing you to get the most less latency time to download any of our books like this one. Merely said, the using multivariate statistics is universally compatible with any devices to read.
14,604 citations
••
TL;DR: Authors/Task Force Members: Piotr Ponikowski* (Chairperson) (Poland), Adriaan A. Voors* (Co-Chair person) (The Netherlands), Stefan D. Anker (Germany), Héctor Bueno (Spain), John G. F. Cleland (UK), Andrew J. S. Coats (UK)
13,400 citations
••
[...]
TL;DR: The role of vitamin D in skeletal and nonskeletal health is considered and strategies for the prevention and treatment ofitamin D deficiency are suggested.
Abstract: Once foods in the United States were fortified with vitamin D, rickets appeared to have been conquered, and many considered major health problems from vitamin D deficiency resolved. But vitamin D deficiency is common. This review considers the role of vitamin D in skeletal and nonskeletal health and suggests strategies for the prevention and treatment of vitamin D deficiency.
11,849 citations