scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

D. H. J. Polymath

Bio: D. H. J. Polymath is an academic researcher. The author has contributed to research in topics: Selberg sieve & Twin prime. The author has an hindex of 2, co-authored 2 publications receiving 132 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In particular, this paper showed that for any admissible triple (h1,h2,h3), there are infinitely many n for which at least two of n+h 1,n+h 2,h 3 are prime, and also showed that either the twin prime conjecture holds or the even Goldbach conjecture is asymptotically true if one allows an additive error of at most 2, or both.
Abstract: For any m≥1, let H m denote the quantity . A celebrated recent result of Zhang showed the finiteness of H1, with the explicit bound H1≤70,000,000. This was then improved by us (the Polymath8 project) to H1≤4680, and then by Maynard to H1≤600, who also established for the first time a finiteness result for H m for m≥2, and specifically that H m ≪m3e4m. If one also assumes the Elliott-Halberstam conjecture, Maynard obtained the bound H1≤12, improving upon the previous bound H1≤16 of Goldston, Pintz, and Yildirim, as well as the bound H m ≪m3e2m. In this paper, we extend the methods of Maynard by generalizing the Selberg sieve further and by performing more extensive numerical calculations. As a consequence, we can obtain the bound H1≤246 unconditionally and H1≤6 under the assumption of the generalized Elliott-Halberstam conjecture. Indeed, under the latter conjecture, we show the stronger statement that for any admissible triple (h1,h2,h3), there are infinitely many n for which at least two of n+h1,n+h2,n+h3 are prime, and also obtain a related disjunction asserting that either the twin prime conjecture holds or the even Goldbach conjecture is asymptotically true if one allows an additive error of at most 2, or both. We also modify the ‘parity problem’ argument of Selberg to show that the H1≤6 bound is the best possible that one can obtain from purely sieve-theoretic considerations. For larger m, we use the distributional results obtained previously by our project to obtain the unconditional asymptotic bound or H m ≪m e2m under the assumption of the Elliott-Halberstam conjecture. We also obtain explicit upper bounds for H m when m=2,3,4,5.

167 citations

Posted Content
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors extend the methods of Maynard by generalizing the Selberg sieve further, and by performing more extensive numerical calculations, and obtain the provable finiteness bound of $H_m$ under the generalized Elliott-Halberstam conjecture, which is the best possible from purely sieve-theoretic considerations.
Abstract: For any $m \geq 1$, let $H_m$ denote the quantity $\liminf_{n \to \infty} (p_{n+m}-p_n)$. A celebrated recent result of Zhang showed the finiteness of $H_1$, with the explicit bound $H_1 \leq 70000000$. This was then improved by us (the Polymath8 project) to $H_1 \leq 4680$, and then by Maynard to $H_1 \leq 600$, who also established for the first time a finiteness result for $H_m$ for $m \geq 2$, and specifically that $H_m \ll m^3 e^{4m}$. If one also assumes the Elliott-Halberstam conjecture, Maynard obtained the bound $H_1 \leq 12$, improving upon the previous bound $H_1 \leq 16$ of Goldston, Pintz, and Y{\i}ld{\i}r{\i}m, as well as the bound $H_m \ll m^3 e^{2m}$. In this paper, we extend the methods of Maynard by generalizing the Selberg sieve further, and by performing more extensive numerical calculations. As a consequence, we can obtain the bound $H_1 \leq 246$ unconditionally, and $H_1 \leq 6$ under the assumption of the generalized Elliott-Halberstam conjecture. Indeed, under the latter conjecture we show the stronger statement that for any admissible triple $(h_1,h_2,h_3)$, there are infinitely many $n$ for which at least two of $n+h_1,n+h_2,n+h_3$ are prime. We modify the "parity problem" argument of Selberg to show that this result is the best possible that one can obtain from purely sieve-theoretic considerations. For larger $m$, we use the distributional results obtained previously by our project to obtain the unconditional asymptotic bound $H_m \ll m e^{(4-\frac{24}{181})m}$, or $H_m \ll m e^{2m}$ under the assumption of the Elliott-Halberstam conjecture. We also obtain explicit upper bounds for $H_m$ when $m=2,3,4,5$.

2 citations


Cited by
More filters
Book ChapterDOI
01 Jan 2006

125 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: For arithmetic progressions to large smooth squarefree moduli, with respect to congruence classes obeying Chinese remainder theorem conditions, the authors obtained an exponent of distribution 1/2 + 7/300.
Abstract: We prove distribution estimates for primes in arithmetic progressions to large smooth squarefree moduli, with respect to congruence classes obeying Chinese remainder theorem conditions, obtaining an exponent of distribution 1/2 + 7/300.

73 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: For arithmetic progressions to large smooth squarefree moduli, with respect to congruence classes obeying Chinese Remainder Theorem conditions, the authors obtained an exponent of distribution for primes of size 1/2 + 7/300.
Abstract: We prove distribution estimates for primes in arithmetic progressions to large smooth squarefree moduli, with respect to congruence classes obeying Chinese Remainder Theorem conditions, obtaining an exponent of distribution $\frac{1}{2} + \frac{7}{300}$

70 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, it was shown that max/pn+1 ≤ X (pn + 1 - pn) ≫ log X log log X ε log log log ε/log log log x ε for sufficiently large X.
Abstract: Let pn denote the n-th prime. We prove that max/pn+1 ≤ X (pn+1 - pn) ≫ log X log log X log log log log X/log log log X for sufficiently large X, improving upon recent bounds of the first three and fifth authors and of the fourth author. Our main new ingredient is a generalization of a hypergraph covering theorem of Pippenger and Spencer, proven using the Rodl nibble method.

62 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In 2014, Zhang as mentioned in this paper proved the existence of a finite bound B such that there are infinitely many pairs of distinct primes which differ by no more than B. This is a massive breakthrough, makes the twin prime conjecture look highly plausible (which can be reinterpreted as the conjecture that one can take B 2) and his work helps us to better understand other delicate questions about prime numbers that had previously seemed intractable.
Abstract: In April 2013, Yitang Zhang proved the existence of a finite bound B such that there are infinitely many pairs of distinct primes which differ by no more than B. This is a massive breakthrough, makes the twin prime conjecture look highly plausible (which can be re-interpreted as the conjecture that one can take B 2) and his work helps us to better understand other delicate questions about prime numbers that had previously seemed intractable. The original purpose of this talk was to discuss Zhang’s extraordinary work, putting it in its context in analytic number theory, and to sketch a proof of his theorem. Zhang had even proved the result with B 70 000 000. Moreover, a co-operative team, polymath8, collaborating only on-line, had been able to lower the value of B to 4680. Not only had they been more careful in several difficult arguments in Zhang’s original paper, they had also developed Zhang’s techniques to be both more powerful and to allow a much simpler proof. Indeed the proof of Zhang’s Theorem, that will be given in the write-up of this talk, is based on these developments. In November, inspired by Zhang’s extraordinary breakthrough, James Maynard dramatically slashed this bound to 600, by a substantially easier method. Both Maynard, and Terry Tao who had independently developed the same idea, were able to extend their proofs to show that for any given integer m ¥ 1 there exists a bound Bm such that there are infinitely many intervals of length Bm containing at least m distinct primes. We will also prove this much stronger result herein, even showing that one can take Bm e 8m . If Zhang’s method is combined with the Maynard-Tao set up then it appears that the bound can be further reduced to 576. If all of these techniques could be pushed to their limit then we would obtain B( B2) 12, so new ideas are still needed to have a feasible plan for proving the twin prime conjecture. The article will be split into two parts. The first half, which appears here, we will introduce the work of Zhang, Polymath8, Maynard and Tao, and explain their arguments that allow them to prove their spectacular results. As we will discuss, Zhang’s main novel contribution is an estimate for primes in relatively short arithmetic progressions. The second half of this article sketches a proof of this result; the Bulletin article will contain full details of this extraordinary work. Part 1. Primes in short intervals

43 citations