scispace - formally typeset
D

D. M. Asner

Researcher at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

Publications -  210
Citations -  33792

D. M. Asner is an academic researcher from Pacific Northwest National Laboratory. The author has contributed to research in topics: Large Hadron Collider & Branching fraction. The author has an hindex of 40, co-authored 112 publications receiving 31378 citations. Previous affiliations of D. M. Asner include Carleton University & CERN.

Papers
More filters
Posted Content

Expected Performance of the ATLAS Experiment - Detector, Trigger and Physics

Georges Aad, +2604 more
TL;DR: In this article, a detailed study of the expected performance of the ATLAS detector is presented, together with the reconstruction of tracks, leptons, photons, missing energy and jets, along with the performance of b-tagging and the trigger.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Physics of the B Factories

Adrian John Bevan, +2064 more
TL;DR: The physics of the SLAC and KEK B Factories are described in this paper, with a brief description of the detectors, BaBar and Belle, and data taking related issues.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Physics of the B Factories

Adrian John Bevan, +2005 more
TL;DR: A brief description of the SLAC and KEK B Factories as well as their detectors, BaBar and Belle, and data taking related issues can be found in Part A of this book as mentioned in this paper.
Journal ArticleDOI

Physics at BES-III

D. M. Asner, +84 more
TL;DR: In this article, the authors provide detailed discussion on important topics in tau-charm physics that will be explored during the next few years at \bes3. Both theoretical and experimental issues are covered, including extensive reviews of recent theoretical developments and experimental techniques.
Journal ArticleDOI

Readiness of the ATLAS Tile Calorimeter for LHC collisions.

Georges Aad, +2568 more
TL;DR: An overview of the Tile Calorimeter performance as measured using random triggers, calibration data, data from cosmic ray muons and single beam data and the determination of the global energy scale was performed with an uncertainty of 4%.