A major assumption in many machine learning and data mining algorithms is that the training and future data must be in the same feature space and have the same distribution. However, in many real-world applications, this assumption may not hold. For example, we sometimes have a classification task in one domain of interest, but we only have sufficient training data in another domain of interest, where the latter data may be in a different feature space or follow a different data distribution. In such cases, knowledge transfer, if done successfully, would greatly improve the performance of learning by avoiding much expensive data-labeling efforts. In recent years, transfer learning has emerged as a new learning framework to address this problem. This survey focuses on categorizing and reviewing the current progress on transfer learning for classification, regression, and clustering problems. In this survey, we discuss the relationship between transfer learning and other related machine learning techniques such as domain adaptation, multitask learning and sample selection bias, as well as covariate shift. We also explore some potential future issues in transfer learning research.

/pdf/a-survey-on-transfer-learning-1hjmu3otql.pdf

A Survey on Transfer Learning

Prospective Cohort Study

Business intelligence and analytics (BI&A) has emerged as an important area of study for both practitioners and researchers, reflecting the magnitude and impact of data-related problems to be solved in contemporary business organizations. This introduction to the MIS Quarterly Special Issue on Business Intelligence Research first provides a framework that identifies the evolution, applications, and emerging research areas of BI&A. BI&A 1.0, BI&A 2.0, and BI&A 3.0 are defined and described in terms of their key characteristics and capabilities. Current research in BI&A is analyzed and challenges and opportunities associated with BI&A research and education are identified. We also report a bibliometric study of critical BI&A publications, researchers, and research topics based on more than a decade of related academic and industry publications. Finally, the six articles that comprise this special issue are introduced and characterized in terms of the proposed BI&A research framework.

/pdf/business-intelligence-and-analytics-from-big-data-to-big-3gk8u8as27.pdf

Business intelligence and analytics: from big data to big impact

In this paper, we review the background and state-of-the-art of big data. We first introduce the general background of big data and review related technologies, such as could computing, Internet of Things, data centers, and Hadoop. We then focus on the four phases of the value chain of big data, i.e., data generation, data acquisition, data storage, and data analysis. For each phase, we introduce the general background, discuss the technical challenges, and review the latest advances. We finally examine the several representative applications of big data, including enterprise management, Internet of Things, online social networks, medial applications, collective intelligence, and smart grid. These discussions aim to provide a comprehensive overview and big-picture to readers of this exciting area. This survey is concluded with a discussion of open problems and future directions.

Big Data: A Survey

Classifier learning with data-sets that suffer from imbalanced class distributions is a challenging problem in data mining community. This issue occurs when the number of examples that represent one class is much lower than the ones of the other classes. Its presence in many real-world applications has brought along a growth of attention from researchers. In machine learning, the ensemble of classifiers are known to increase the accuracy of single classifiers by combining several of them, but neither of these learning techniques alone solve the class imbalance problem, to deal with this issue the ensemble learning algorithms have to be designed specifically. In this paper, our aim is to review the state of the art on ensemble techniques in the framework of imbalanced data-sets, with focus on two-class problems. We propose a taxonomy for ensemble-based methods to address the class imbalance where each proposal can be categorized depending on the inner ensemble methodology in which it is based. In addition, we develop a thorough empirical comparison by the consideration of the most significant published approaches, within the families of the taxonomy proposed, to show whether any of them makes a difference. This comparison has shown the good behavior of the simplest approaches which combine random undersampling techniques with bagging or boosting ensembles. In addition, the positive synergy between sampling techniques and bagging has stood out. Furthermore, our results show empirically that ensemble-based algorithms are worthwhile since they outperform the mere use of preprocessing techniques before learning the classifier, therefore justifying the increase of complexity by means of a significant enhancement of the results.

A Review on Ensembles for the Class Imbalance Problem: Bagging-, Boosting-, and Hybrid-Based Approaches

This paper presents the top 10 data mining algorithms identified by the IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM) in December 2006: C4.5, k-Means, SVM, Apriori, EM, PageRank, AdaBoost, kNN, Naive Bayes, and CART. These top 10 algorithms are among the most influential data mining algorithms in the research community. With each algorithm, we provide a description of the algorithm, discuss the impact of the algorithm, and review current and further research on the algorithm. These 10 algorithms cover classification, clustering, statistical learning, association analysis, and link mining, which are all among the most important topics in data mining research and development.

/pdf/top-10-algorithms-in-data-mining-70qtv03lc6.pdf

Top 10 algorithms in data mining

10.1 Antecedents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 180 10.2 Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 181 10.3 A Running Example . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 181 10.4 The Algorithm Briefly Stated . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 183 10.5 Splitting Rules . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 185 10.6 Prior Probabilities and Class Balancing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 187 10.7 Missing Value Handling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 189 10.8 Attribute Importance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 190 10.9 Dynamic Feature Construction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 191 10.10 Cost-Sensitive Learning . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 192 10.11 Stopping Rules, Pruning, Tree Sequences, and Tree Selection . . . . . . . . . 193 10.12 Probability Trees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 194 10.13 Theoretical Foundations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 196 10.14 Post-CART Related Research . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 196 10.15 Software Availability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 198 10.16 Exercises . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 198 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 199

CART: Classification and Regression Trees

This paper introduces new forms, sampling and estimation approaches fordiscrete choice models. The new models include behavioral specifications oflatent class choice models, multinomial probit, hybrid logit, andnon-parametric methods. Recent contributions also include new specializedchoice based sample designs that permit greater efficiency in datacollection. Finally, the paper describes recent developments in the use ofsimulation methods for model estimation. These developments are designed toallow the applications of discrete choice models to a wider variety ofdiscrete choice problems.

/pdf/modeling-methods-for-discrete-choice-analysis-4cs69hxniw.pdf

Modeling Methods for Discrete Choice Analysis

Predictive analytics play an important role in clinical research. An accurate predictive model can help clinicians stratify risk thereby allowing the identification of a target population which might benefit from a certain intervention. Conventionally, predictive analytics is performed using parametric modeling which comes with a number of assumptions. For example, generalized linear regression models require linearity and additivity to hold for the underlying data. However, these assumptions may not hold in practice. Especially in the era of big data, a large number of covariates or features can be extracted from an electronic database which might have complex interactions and higher-order terms among the covariates. Conventional modeling methods have trouble capturing such high-dimensional relationships. However, some sophisticated machine learning techniques have been invented to handle this situation. Gradient boosting is one of these techniques which is able to recursively fit a weak learner to the residual so as to improve model performance with a gradually increasing number of iterations. It can automatically discover complex data structure, including nonlinearity and high-order interactions, even in the context of hundreds, thousands, or tens-of-thousands of potential predictors. This paper aims to introduce how gradient boosting works. The principles behind this learning machine are explained with a small example in a step-by-step manner. The formal implementation of gradient tree boosting is then illustrated with the caret package. In the simulated example complexity of data structure is created by generating certain interactions between the covariates. This example shows that gradient boosting can better capture these complex relationships than a generalized linear model-based approach.

/pdf/predictive-analytics-with-gradient-boosting-in-clinical-1mpcrjwe8n.pdf

Dan Steinberg

Papers

Top 10 algorithms in data mining

CART: Classification and Regression Trees

Modeling Methods for Discrete Choice Analysis

Predictive analytics with gradient boosting in clinical medicine

Survival: A Supplementary Module for SYSTAT