scispace - formally typeset
D

Daniel B. Larremore

Researcher at University of Colorado Boulder

Publications -  89
Citations -  6085

Daniel B. Larremore is an academic researcher from University of Colorado Boulder. The author has contributed to research in topics: Population & Medicine. The author has an hindex of 26, co-authored 74 publications receiving 3878 citations. Previous affiliations of Daniel B. Larremore include Harvard University & Santa Fe Institute.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Test sensitivity is secondary to frequency and turnaround time for COVID-19 screening.

TL;DR: It is demonstrated that effective screening depends largely on frequency of testing and speed of reporting and is only marginally improved by high test sensitivity, and should prioritize accessibility, frequency, and sample-to-answer time.
Journal ArticleDOI

Rethinking Covid-19 Test Sensitivity - A Strategy for Containment.

TL;DR: A simple point-of-care test that is inexpensive enough to use frequently, even if it lacks sensitivity, is proposed for Covid-19 cases.
Journal ArticleDOI

Model-informed COVID-19 vaccine prioritization strategies by age and serostatus.

TL;DR: This article used a mathematical model to compare five age-stratified prioritization strategies for the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine and found that individual-level serological tests to redirect doses to seronegative individuals improved the marginal impact of each dose while potentially reducing existing inequities in COVID-19 impact.
Journal ArticleDOI

The ground truth about metadata and community detection in networks

TL;DR: It is proved that no algorithm can uniquely solve community detection, and a general No Free Lunch theorem for community detection is proved, which implies that there can be no algorithm that is optimal for all possible community detection tasks.
Journal ArticleDOI

Systematic inequality and hierarchy in faculty hiring networks

TL;DR: It is found that faculty hiring follows a common and steeply hierarchical structure that reflects profound social inequality and increased institutional prestige leads to increased faculty production, better faculty placement, and a more influential position within the discipline.