scispace - formally typeset
D

Daniel G. Bobrow

Researcher at PARC

Publications -  220
Citations -  19700

Daniel G. Bobrow is an academic researcher from PARC. The author has contributed to research in topics: Lisp & Knowledge representation and reasoning. The author has an hindex of 59, co-authored 220 publications receiving 19470 citations. Previous affiliations of Daniel G. Bobrow include Wilmington University & Xerox.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

On data-limited and resource-limited processes

TL;DR: The principles discussed show that conclusions about the interactions among psychological processes must be made with caution, and some existing assumptions may be unwarranted, as well as resulting in some new interpretations of interactions among competing psychological processes.
Book

The art of metaobject protocol

TL;DR: A new approach to programming language design is presented, which resolves fundamental tensions between elegance and efficiency, and a metaobject protocol is presented that gives users the ability to incrementally modify the language's behavior and implementation.
Journal ArticleDOI

Beyond the chalkboard: computer support for collaboration and problem solving in meetings

TL;DR: The Colab meeting room at Xerox PARC as mentioned in this paper has been created to study computer support of collaborative problem solving in face-to-face meetings, and the long-term goal is to understand how to build computer tools to make meetings more effective.
Book

Representation and Understanding: Studies in Cognitive Science

TL;DR: The use of narrative and other prose forms as a tool for investigating mental processes is not new as discussed by the authors, and there has been a renewal of interest in the study of narratives and memory due to the recognition that narrative taps certain processes that syllables and isolated words do not.
Journal ArticleDOI

An overview of KRL, a Knowledge Representation Language

TL;DR: KRL is an attempt to integrate procedural knowledge with a broad base of declarative forms to give flexibility in associating procedures with specific pieces of knowledge, and to control the relative accessibility of different facts and descriptions.