scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Daniel G. MacArthur

Bio: Daniel G. MacArthur is an academic researcher from Broad Institute. The author has contributed to research in topics: Population & Exome sequencing. The author has an hindex of 80, co-authored 265 publications receiving 54145 citations. Previous affiliations of Daniel G. MacArthur include Harvard University & Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Topics: Population, Exome sequencing, Exome, Genome, Genomics


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Adam Auton1, Gonçalo R. Abecasis2, David Altshuler3, Richard Durbin4  +514 moreInstitutions (90)
01 Oct 2015-Nature
TL;DR: The 1000 Genomes Project set out to provide a comprehensive description of common human genetic variation by applying whole-genome sequencing to a diverse set of individuals from multiple populations, and has reconstructed the genomes of 2,504 individuals from 26 populations using a combination of low-coverage whole-generation sequencing, deep exome sequencing, and dense microarray genotyping.
Abstract: The 1000 Genomes Project set out to provide a comprehensive description of common human genetic variation by applying whole-genome sequencing to a diverse set of individuals from multiple populations. Here we report completion of the project, having reconstructed the genomes of 2,504 individuals from 26 populations using a combination of low-coverage whole-genome sequencing, deep exome sequencing, and dense microarray genotyping. We characterized a broad spectrum of genetic variation, in total over 88 million variants (84.7 million single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), 3.6 million short insertions/deletions (indels), and 60,000 structural variants), all phased onto high-quality haplotypes. This resource includes >99% of SNP variants with a frequency of >1% for a variety of ancestries. We describe the distribution of genetic variation across the global sample, and discuss the implications for common disease studies.

12,661 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Monkol Lek, Konrad J. Karczewski1, Konrad J. Karczewski2, Eric Vallabh Minikel2, Eric Vallabh Minikel1, Kaitlin E. Samocha, Eric Banks1, Timothy Fennell1, Anne H. O’Donnell-Luria1, Anne H. O’Donnell-Luria2, Anne H. O’Donnell-Luria3, James S. Ware, Andrew J. Hill4, Andrew J. Hill2, Andrew J. Hill1, Beryl B. Cummings1, Beryl B. Cummings2, Taru Tukiainen2, Taru Tukiainen1, Daniel P. Birnbaum1, Jack A. Kosmicki, Laramie E. Duncan1, Laramie E. Duncan2, Karol Estrada2, Karol Estrada1, Fengmei Zhao1, Fengmei Zhao2, James Zou1, Emma Pierce-Hoffman1, Emma Pierce-Hoffman2, Joanne Berghout5, David Neil Cooper6, Nicole A. Deflaux7, Mark A. DePristo1, Ron Do, Jason Flannick2, Jason Flannick1, Menachem Fromer, Laura D. Gauthier1, Jackie Goldstein2, Jackie Goldstein1, Namrata Gupta1, Daniel P. Howrigan2, Daniel P. Howrigan1, Adam Kiezun1, Mitja I. Kurki1, Mitja I. Kurki2, Ami Levy Moonshine1, Pradeep Natarajan, Lorena Orozco, Gina M. Peloso2, Gina M. Peloso1, Ryan Poplin1, Manuel A. Rivas1, Valentin Ruano-Rubio1, Samuel A. Rose1, Douglas M. Ruderfer8, Khalid Shakir1, Peter D. Stenson6, Christine Stevens1, Brett Thomas2, Brett Thomas1, Grace Tiao1, María Teresa Tusié-Luna, Ben Weisburd1, Hong-Hee Won9, Dongmei Yu, David Altshuler10, David Altshuler1, Diego Ardissino, Michael Boehnke11, John Danesh12, Stacey Donnelly1, Roberto Elosua, Jose C. Florez1, Jose C. Florez2, Stacey Gabriel1, Gad Getz2, Gad Getz1, Stephen J. Glatt13, Christina M. Hultman14, Sekar Kathiresan, Markku Laakso15, Steven A. McCarroll1, Steven A. McCarroll2, Mark I. McCarthy16, Mark I. McCarthy17, Dermot P.B. McGovern18, Ruth McPherson19, Benjamin M. Neale1, Benjamin M. Neale2, Aarno Palotie, Shaun Purcell8, Danish Saleheen20, Jeremiah M. Scharf, Pamela Sklar, Patrick F. Sullivan21, Patrick F. Sullivan14, Jaakko Tuomilehto22, Ming T. Tsuang23, Hugh Watkins16, Hugh Watkins17, James G. Wilson24, Mark J. Daly2, Mark J. Daly1, Daniel G. MacArthur2, Daniel G. MacArthur1 
18 Aug 2016-Nature
TL;DR: The aggregation and analysis of high-quality exome (protein-coding region) DNA sequence data for 60,706 individuals of diverse ancestries generated as part of the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC) provides direct evidence for the presence of widespread mutational recurrence.
Abstract: Large-scale reference data sets of human genetic variation are critical for the medical and functional interpretation of DNA sequence changes. Here we describe the aggregation and analysis of high-quality exome (protein-coding region) DNA sequence data for 60,706 individuals of diverse ancestries generated as part of the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC). This catalogue of human genetic diversity contains an average of one variant every eight bases of the exome, and provides direct evidence for the presence of widespread mutational recurrence. We have used this catalogue to calculate objective metrics of pathogenicity for sequence variants, and to identify genes subject to strong selection against various classes of mutation; identifying 3,230 genes with near-complete depletion of predicted protein-truncating variants, with 72% of these genes having no currently established human disease phenotype. Finally, we demonstrate that these data can be used for the efficient filtering of candidate disease-causing variants, and for the discovery of human 'knockout' variants in protein-coding genes.

8,758 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
27 May 2020-Nature
TL;DR: A catalogue of predicted loss-of-function variants in 125,748 whole-exome and 15,708 whole-genome sequencing datasets from the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD) reveals the spectrum of mutational constraints that affect these human protein-coding genes.
Abstract: Genetic variants that inactivate protein-coding genes are a powerful source of information about the phenotypic consequences of gene disruption: genes that are crucial for the function of an organism will be depleted of such variants in natural populations, whereas non-essential genes will tolerate their accumulation. However, predicted loss-of-function variants are enriched for annotation errors, and tend to be found at extremely low frequencies, so their analysis requires careful variant annotation and very large sample sizes1. Here we describe the aggregation of 125,748 exomes and 15,708 genomes from human sequencing studies into the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). We identify 443,769 high-confidence predicted loss-of-function variants in this cohort after filtering for artefacts caused by sequencing and annotation errors. Using an improved model of human mutation rates, we classify human protein-coding genes along a spectrum that represents tolerance to inactivation, validate this classification using data from model organisms and engineered human cells, and show that it can be used to improve the power of gene discovery for both common and rare diseases. A catalogue of predicted loss-of-function variants in 125,748 whole-exome and 15,708 whole-genome sequencing datasets from the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD) reveals the spectrum of mutational constraints that affect these human protein-coding genes.

4,913 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Kristin G. Ardlie, David S. DeLuca, Ayellet V. Segrè, Timothy J. Sullivan, Taylor Young, Ellen Gelfand, Casandra A. Trowbridge, Julian Maller, Taru Tukiainen, Monkol Lek, Lucas D. Ward, Pouya Kheradpour, Benjamin Iriarte, Yan Meng, Cameron D. Palmer, Tõnu Esko, Wendy Winckler, Joel N. Hirschhorn, Manolis Kellis, Daniel G. MacArthur, Gad Getz, Andrey A. Shabalin, Gen Li, Yi-Hui Zhou, Andrew B. Nobel, Ivan Rusyn, Fred A. Wright, Tuuli Lappalainen, Pedro G. Ferreira, Halit Ongen, Manuel A. Rivas, Alexis Battle, Sara Mostafavi, Jean Monlong, Michael Sammeth, Marta Melé, Ferran Reverter, Jakob M. Goldmann, Daphne Koller, Roderic Guigó, Mark I. McCarthy, Emmanouil T. Dermitzakis, Eric R. Gamazon, Hae Kyung Im, Anuar Konkashbaev, Dan L. Nicolae, Nancy J. Cox, Timothée Flutre, Xiaoquan Wen, Matthew Stephens, Jonathan K. Pritchard, Zhidong Tu, Bin Zhang, Tao Huang, Quan Long, Luan Lin, Jialiang Yang, Jun Zhu, Jun Liu, Amanda Brown, Bernadette Mestichelli, Denee Tidwell, Edmund Lo, Mike Salvatore, Saboor Shad, Jeffrey A. Thomas, John T. Lonsdale, Michael T. Moser, Bryan Gillard, Ellen Karasik, Kimberly Ramsey, Christopher Choi, Barbara A. Foster, John Syron, Johnell Fleming, Harold Magazine, Rick Hasz, Gary Walters, Jason Bridge, Mark Miklos, Susan L. Sullivan, Laura Barker, Heather M. Traino, Maghboeba Mosavel, Laura A. Siminoff, Dana R. Valley, Daniel C. Rohrer, Scott D. Jewell, Philip A. Branton, Leslie H. Sobin, Mary Barcus, Liqun Qi, Jeffrey McLean, Pushpa Hariharan, Ki Sung Um, Shenpei Wu, David Tabor, Charles Shive, Anna M. Smith, Stephen A. Buia, Anita H. Undale, Karna Robinson, Nancy Roche, Kimberly M. Valentino, Angela Britton, Robin Burges, Debra Bradbury, Kenneth W. Hambright, John Seleski, Greg E. Korzeniewski, Kenyon Erickson, Yvonne Marcus, Jorge Tejada, Mehran Taherian, Chunrong Lu, Margaret J. Basile, Deborah C. Mash, Simona Volpi, Jeffery P. Struewing, Gary F. Temple, Joy T. Boyer, Deborah Colantuoni, Roger Little, Susan E. Koester, Latarsha J. Carithers, Helen M. Moore, Ping Guan, Carolyn C. Compton, Sherilyn Sawyer, Joanne P. Demchok, Jimmie B. Vaught, Chana A. Rabiner, Nicole C. Lockhart 
08 May 2015-Science
TL;DR: The landscape of gene expression across tissues is described, thousands of tissue-specific and shared regulatory expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) variants are cataloged, complex network relationships are described, and signals from genome-wide association studies explained by eQTLs are identified.
Abstract: Understanding the functional consequences of genetic variation, and how it affects complex human disease and quantitative traits, remains a critical challenge for biomedicine. We present an analysi...

4,418 citations

01 Oct 2015
TL;DR: The 1000 Genomes Project as mentioned in this paper provided a comprehensive description of common human genetic variation by applying whole-genome sequencing to a diverse set of individuals from multiple populations, and reported the completion of the project, having reconstructed the genomes of 2,504 individuals from 26 populations using a combination of low-coverage whole genome sequencing, deep exome sequencing and dense microarray genotyping.
Abstract: The 1000 Genomes Project set out to provide a comprehensive description of common human genetic variation by applying whole-genome sequencing to a diverse set of individuals from multiple populations. Here we report completion of the project, having reconstructed the genomes of 2,504 individuals from 26 populations using a combination of low-coverage whole-genome sequencing, deep exome sequencing, and dense microarray genotyping. We characterized a broad spectrum of genetic variation, in total over 88 million variants (84.7 million single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), 3.6 million short insertions/deletions (indels), and 60,000 structural variants), all phased onto high-quality haplotypes. This resource includes >99% of SNP variants with a frequency of >1% for a variety of ancestries. We describe the distribution of genetic variation across the global sample, and discuss the implications for common disease studies.

3,247 citations


Cited by
More filters
28 Jul 2005
TL;DR: PfPMP1)与感染红细胞、树突状组胞以及胎盘的单个或多个受体作用,在黏附及免疫逃避中起关键的作�ly.
Abstract: 抗原变异可使得多种致病微生物易于逃避宿主免疫应答。表达在感染红细胞表面的恶性疟原虫红细胞表面蛋白1(PfPMP1)与感染红细胞、内皮细胞、树突状细胞以及胎盘的单个或多个受体作用,在黏附及免疫逃避中起关键的作用。每个单倍体基因组var基因家族编码约60种成员,通过启动转录不同的var基因变异体为抗原变异提供了分子基础。

18,940 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Because of the increased complexity of analysis and interpretation of clinical genetic testing described in this report, the ACMG strongly recommends thatclinical molecular genetic testing should be performed in a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments–approved laboratory, with results interpreted by a board-certified clinical molecular geneticist or molecular genetic pathologist or the equivalent.

17,834 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Adam Auton1, Gonçalo R. Abecasis2, David Altshuler3, Richard Durbin4  +514 moreInstitutions (90)
01 Oct 2015-Nature
TL;DR: The 1000 Genomes Project set out to provide a comprehensive description of common human genetic variation by applying whole-genome sequencing to a diverse set of individuals from multiple populations, and has reconstructed the genomes of 2,504 individuals from 26 populations using a combination of low-coverage whole-generation sequencing, deep exome sequencing, and dense microarray genotyping.
Abstract: The 1000 Genomes Project set out to provide a comprehensive description of common human genetic variation by applying whole-genome sequencing to a diverse set of individuals from multiple populations. Here we report completion of the project, having reconstructed the genomes of 2,504 individuals from 26 populations using a combination of low-coverage whole-genome sequencing, deep exome sequencing, and dense microarray genotyping. We characterized a broad spectrum of genetic variation, in total over 88 million variants (84.7 million single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), 3.6 million short insertions/deletions (indels), and 60,000 structural variants), all phased onto high-quality haplotypes. This resource includes >99% of SNP variants with a frequency of >1% for a variety of ancestries. We describe the distribution of genetic variation across the global sample, and discuss the implications for common disease studies.

12,661 citations

Journal Article
Fumio Tajima1
30 Oct 1989-Genomics
TL;DR: It is suggested that the natural selection against large insertion/deletion is so weak that a large amount of variation is maintained in a population.

11,521 citations

Journal Article
TL;DR: For the next few weeks the course is going to be exploring a field that’s actually older than classical population genetics, although the approach it’ll be taking to it involves the use of population genetic machinery.
Abstract: So far in this course we have dealt entirely with the evolution of characters that are controlled by simple Mendelian inheritance at a single locus. There are notes on the course website about gametic disequilibrium and how allele frequencies change at two loci simultaneously, but we didn’t discuss them. In every example we’ve considered we’ve imagined that we could understand something about evolution by examining the evolution of a single gene. That’s the domain of classical population genetics. For the next few weeks we’re going to be exploring a field that’s actually older than classical population genetics, although the approach we’ll be taking to it involves the use of population genetic machinery. If you know a little about the history of evolutionary biology, you may know that after the rediscovery of Mendel’s work in 1900 there was a heated debate between the “biometricians” (e.g., Galton and Pearson) and the “Mendelians” (e.g., de Vries, Correns, Bateson, and Morgan). Biometricians asserted that the really important variation in evolution didn’t follow Mendelian rules. Height, weight, skin color, and similar traits seemed to

9,847 citations