scispace - formally typeset
D

Daniel Garrigan

Researcher at University of Rochester

Publications -  33
Citations -  2446

Daniel Garrigan is an academic researcher from University of Rochester. The author has contributed to research in topics: Population & Coalescent theory. The author has an hindex of 23, co-authored 33 publications receiving 2295 citations. Previous affiliations of Daniel Garrigan include University of Arizona & Arizona State University.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Perspective: detecting adaptive molecular polymorphism: lessons from the MHC.

TL;DR: It is found that selection is not detectable in MHC datasets in every generation, population, or every evolutionary lineage, suggesting either that selection on the MHC is heterogeneous or that many of the current neutrality tests lack sufficient power to detect the selection consistently.
Journal ArticleDOI

Reconstructing human origins in the genomic era

TL;DR: The different genetic and statistical methods that are available for studying human population history are discussed, and the most plausible models of human evolution that can accommodate the contrasting patterns observed at different loci throughout the genome are identified.
Journal ArticleDOI

Genome sequencing reveals complex speciation in the Drosophila simulans clade

TL;DR: It is shown that gene flow has occurred throughout the genomes of the D. simulans clade species despite considerable geographic, ecological, and intrinsic reproductive isolation, and the relatively reduced efficacy of natural selection in D. sechellia is consistent with its derived, persistently reduced historical effective population size.

Detecting adaptive molecular polymorphism: lessons from the mhc

TL;DR: It is found that selection is not detectable in MHC datasets in every generation, population, or every evolutionary lineage, suggesting either that selection on the MHC is heterogeneous or that many of the current neutrality tests lack sufficient power to detect the selection consistently.
Journal ArticleDOI

Estimates of the Heritability of Human Longevity Are Substantially Inflated due to Assortative Mating

TL;DR: It is concluded that the true heritability of human longevity for birth cohorts across the 1800s and early 1900s was well below 10%, and that it has been generally overestimated due to the effect of assortative mating.