scispace - formally typeset
D

Daniel Smith

Researcher at General Medical Council

Publications -  13
Citations -  203

Daniel Smith is an academic researcher from General Medical Council. The author has contributed to research in topics: Medicine & Specialty. The author has an hindex of 7, co-authored 9 publications receiving 131 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The UK medical education database (UKMED) what is it? Why and how might you use it?

TL;DR: This paper describes the creation, structure and access arrangements for the first UK-wide attempt to create a research database, UKMED, to improve standards, facilitate workforce planning and support the regulation of medical education and training.
Journal ArticleDOI

Exploring UK medical school differences: the MedDifs study of selection, teaching, student and F1 perceptions, postgraduate outcomes and fitness to practise

I. C. McManus, +188 more
- 14 May 2020 - 
TL;DR: A surprising finding is that schools such as PBL schools which reported greater student satisfaction with feedback also showed lower performance at postgraduate examinations, which may have important implications for the quality of patient care and patient safety.
Journal ArticleDOI

Evaluating the validity of the selection measures used for the UK's foundation medical training programme: a national cohort study.

TL;DR: The EPM decile and SJT scores may be effective selection measures for the foundation programme, however, educational achievements does not add value to the other two measures when predicting programme completion, and its usefulness in this context is less clear.
Journal ArticleDOI

Predictors of fitness to practise declarations in UK medical undergraduates

TL;DR: White ethnicity and UK nationality were associated with increased odds of both conduct and health-related declarations, as were certain personality traits, which suggest students from non-professional backgrounds may be at increased risk of depression and therefore could benefit from targeted support.
Journal ArticleDOI

A comparison of undergraduate outcomes for students from gateway courses and standard entry medicine courses

TL;DR: Differences of the available measures between gateway students and SEMED students on entry to their medical degrees are greater than the differences on exit, providing modest evidence that gateway courses allow students from under-represented groups to achieve greater academic potential.