scispace - formally typeset
D

Daniele Nicolodi

Researcher at National Institute of Standards and Technology

Publications -  89
Citations -  4570

Daniele Nicolodi is an academic researcher from National Institute of Standards and Technology. The author has contributed to research in topics: Atomic clock & Laser. The author has an hindex of 32, co-authored 87 publications receiving 3640 citations. Previous affiliations of Daniele Nicolodi include University of Trento & Pierre-and-Marie-Curie University.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Sub-Femto-g Free Fall for Space-Based Gravitational Wave Observatories: LISA Pathfinder Results

Michele Armano, +118 more
TL;DR: The first results of the LISA Pathfinder in-flight experiment demonstrate that two free-falling reference test masses, such as those needed for a space-based gravitational wave observatory like LISA, can be put in free fall with a relative acceleration noise with a square root of the power spectral density.
Journal ArticleDOI

Atomic clock performance enabling geodesy below the centimetre level

TL;DR: Local optical clock measurements that surpass the current ability to account for the gravitational distortion of space-time across the surface of Earth are demonstrated and improved techniques allow the measurement of a frequency difference with an uncertainty of the order of 10–19 between two independent optical lattice clocks, suggesting that they may be able to improve state-of-the-art geodetic techniques.
Journal ArticleDOI

Ultrastable optical clock with two cold-atom ensembles

TL;DR: In this paper, a zero-dead-time optical clock based on interleaved interrogation of two cold-atom ensembles has been proposed to overcome the Dick effect, which results in an aliasing of frequency noise from the laser interrogating the atomic transition.
Journal ArticleDOI

Atomic clock performance beyond the geodetic limit

TL;DR: In this paper, two independent ytterbium optical lattice clocks were used to demonstrate unprecedented levels in three fundamental benchmarks of clock performance: systematic uncertainty of $1.4, measurement instability of $3.2, and reproducibility characterised by ten blinded frequency comparisons, yielding a frequency difference of $[-7 \pm (5)stat} \pm(8)_{sys}] \times 10^{-19}