scispace - formally typeset
D

David B. Resnik

Researcher at National Institutes of Health

Publications -  334
Citations -  8705

David B. Resnik is an academic researcher from National Institutes of Health. The author has contributed to research in topics: Research ethics & Bioethics. The author has an hindex of 45, co-authored 320 publications receiving 7453 citations. Previous affiliations of David B. Resnik include East Carolina University & University of Wyoming.

Papers
More filters
Book

Responsible Conduct of Research

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors discuss the use of anthropomorphic data in scientific research and discuss the role of animals in the research process, including the use and exploitation of artificial intelligence in biomedical research.
Journal Article

What Is Ethics in Research and Why Is It Important

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors define "ethics" as norms for conduct that distinguish between acceptable and unaccellable behavior, which is the most common way of defining 'ethics'.
Journal Article

Conflict of Interest in Medical Research, Education, and Practice

TL;DR: The Institute of Medicine’s Conflict of Interest in Medical Research, Education, and Practice makes an important contribution to the continuing debate about financial conflicts of interest in medicine and makes 16 recommendations for reforming medicine, some of which would require radical changes.
BookDOI

The ethics of science: An introduction

TL;DR: The Ethics of Science as mentioned in this paper is a comprehensive and student-friendly introduction to the study of ethics in science and scientific research, including case studies such as the Baltimore Affair, cold fusion, Milikan's oil drop experiments, human and animal cloning, and tobacco research.
Journal ArticleDOI

Is the precautionary principle unscientific

TL;DR: The precautionary principle holds that we should not allow scientific uncertainty to prevent us from taking precautionary measures in response to potential threats that are irreversible and potentially disastrous as mentioned in this paper, and the principle can be proven to be scientific provided that the threats addressed by the principle are plausible threats, and that the measures adopted are reasonable.