Author
David C. Wedge
Other affiliations: University of Oxford, University of Cambridge, Wellcome Trust ...read more
Bio: David C. Wedge is an academic researcher from University of Manchester. The author has contributed to research in topics: Somatic evolution in cancer & Cancer. The author has an hindex of 59, co-authored 156 publications receiving 31552 citations. Previous affiliations of David C. Wedge include University of Oxford & University of Cambridge.
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute1, Wellcome Trust2, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust3, University of British Columbia4, University of Cambridge5, The Breast Cancer Research Foundation6, Oslo University Hospital7, University of Oslo8, University of Münster9, Université libre de Bruxelles10, German Cancer Research Center11, University of Iceland12, Erasmus University Rotterdam13, Paris Descartes University14, French Institute of Health and Medical Research15, University of Paris16, Broad Institute17, University of Bergen18, University of Queensland19, University of Oviedo20, University of Glasgow21, Harvard University22, United States Department of Veterans Affairs23, Netherlands Cancer Institute24, University of Kiel25, Radboud University Nijmegen26, King's College London27, Curie Institute28, University of New South Wales29, Bankstown Lidcombe Hospital30, University of Barcelona31
TL;DR: It is shown that hypermutation localized to small genomic regions, ‘kataegis’, is found in many cancer types, and this results reveal the diversity of mutational processes underlying the development of cancer.
Abstract: All cancers are caused by somatic mutations; however, understanding of the biological processes generating these mutations is limited. The catalogue of somatic mutations from a cancer genome bears the signatures of the mutational processes that have been operative. Here we analysed 4,938,362 mutations from 7,042 cancers and extracted more than 20 distinct mutational signatures. Some are present in many cancer types, notably a signature attributed to the APOBEC family of cytidine deaminases, whereas others are confined to a single cancer class. Certain signatures are associated with age of the patient at cancer diagnosis, known mutagenic exposures or defects in DNA maintenance, but many are of cryptic origin. In addition to these genome-wide mutational signatures, hypermutation localized to small genomic regions, 'kataegis', is found in many cancer types. The results reveal the diversity of mutational processes underlying the development of cancer, with potential implications for understanding of cancer aetiology, prevention and therapy.
7,904 citations
Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute1, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven2, Flanders Institute for Biotechnology3, Norwich Research Park4, University of East Anglia5, Lund University6, Harvard University7, Oslo University Hospital8, King's College London9, Erasmus University Rotterdam10, University of British Columbia11, Curie Institute12, The Breast Cancer Research Foundation13, Medical Research Council14, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust15, University of Cambridge16
TL;DR: This work generated catalogs of somatic mutation from 21 breast cancers and applied mathematical methods to extract mutational signatures of the underlying processes, finding a remarkable phenomenon of localized hypermutation, termed “kataegis,” was observed.
1,699 citations
Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute1, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust2, Lund University3, Erasmus University Medical Center4, Radboud University Nijmegen5, European Bioinformatics Institute6, University of Oslo7, Oslo University Hospital8, Gachon University9, Netherlands Cancer Institute10, Université libre de Bruxelles11, University of Antwerp12, Harvard University13, University of Amsterdam14, University of Ulsan15, Hanyang University16, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center17, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center18, French Institute of Health and Medical Research19, Ninewells Hospital20, ICM Partners21, University of Queensland22, University of Iceland23, Curie Institute24, University of Cambridge25, Institute of Cancer Research26, King's College London27, University of Bergen28, Singapore General Hospital29
TL;DR: This analysis of all classes of somatic mutation across exons, introns and intergenic regions highlights the repertoire of cancer genes and mutational processes operative, and progresses towards a comprehensive account of the somatic genetic basis of breast cancer.
Abstract: We analysed whole-genome sequences of 560 breast cancers to advance understanding of the driver mutations conferring clonal advantage and the mutational processes generating somatic mutations. We found that 93 protein-coding cancer genes carried probable driver mutations. Some non-coding regions exhibited high mutation frequencies, but most have distinctive structural features probably causing elevated mutation rates and do not contain driver mutations. Mutational signature analysis was extended to genome rearrangements and revealed twelve base substitution and six rearrangement signatures. Three rearrangement signatures, characterized by tandem duplications or deletions, appear associated with defective homologous-recombination-based DNA repair: one with deficient BRCA1 function, another with deficient BRCA1 or BRCA2 function, the cause of the third is unknown. This analysis of all classes of somatic mutation across exons, introns and intergenic regions highlights the repertoire of cancer genes and mutational processes operating, and progresses towards a comprehensive account of the somatic genetic basis of breast cancer.
1,696 citations
Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute1, Wellcome Trust2, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven3, University of East Anglia4, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust5, Academia Sinica6, Singapore General Hospital7, Netherlands Cancer Institute8, University of Queensland9, University of British Columbia10, Erasmus University Rotterdam11, Harvard University12, University of Cambridge13, Claude Bernard University Lyon 114, Curie Institute15, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital16, University of Amsterdam17, Université libre de Bruxelles18, The Breast Cancer Research Foundation19, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust20, Oslo University Hospital21
TL;DR: Strong correlations between mutation number, age at which cancer was diagnosed and cancer histological grade are found, and multiple mutational signatures are observed, including one present in about ten per cent of tumours characterized by numerous mutations of cytosine at TpC dinucleotides.
Abstract: All cancers carry somatic mutations in their genomes. A subset, known as driver mutations, confer clonal selective advantage on cancer cells and are causally implicated in oncogenesis, and the remainder are passenger mutations. The driver mutations and mutational processes operative in breast cancer have not yet been comprehensively explored. Here we examine the genomes of 100 tumours for somatic copy number changes and mutations in the coding exons of protein-coding genes. The number of somatic mutations varied markedly between individual tumours. We found strong correlations between mutation number, age at which cancer was diagnosed and cancer histological grade, and observed multiple mutational signatures, including one present in about ten per cent of tumours characterized by numerous mutations of cytosine at TpC dinucleotides. Driver mutations were identified in several new cancer genes including AKT2, ARID1B, CASP8, CDKN1B, MAP3K1, MAP3K13, NCOR1, SMARCD1 and TBX3. Among the 100 tumours, we found driver mutations in at least 40 cancer genes and 73 different combinations of mutated cancer genes. The results highlight the substantial genetic diversity underlying this common disease.
1,606 citations
TL;DR: The flagship paper of the ICGC/TCGA Pan-Cancer Analysis of Whole Genomes Consortium describes the generation of the integrative analyses of 2,658 whole-cancer genomes and their matching normal tissues across 38 tumour types, the structures for international data sharing and standardized analyses, and the main scientific findings from across the consortium studies.
Abstract: Cancer is driven by genetic change, and the advent of massively parallel sequencing has enabled systematic documentation of this variation at the whole-genome scale1,2,3. Here we report the integrative analysis of 2,658 whole-cancer genomes and their matching normal tissues across 38 tumour types from the Pan-Cancer Analysis of Whole Genomes (PCAWG) Consortium of the International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC) and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). We describe the generation of the PCAWG resource, facilitated by international data sharing using compute clouds. On average, cancer genomes contained 4–5 driver mutations when combining coding and non-coding genomic elements; however, in around 5% of cases no drivers were identified, suggesting that cancer driver discovery is not yet complete. Chromothripsis, in which many clustered structural variants arise in a single catastrophic event, is frequently an early event in tumour evolution; in acral melanoma, for example, these events precede most somatic point mutations and affect several cancer-associated genes simultaneously. Cancers with abnormal telomere maintenance often originate from tissues with low replicative activity and show several mechanisms of preventing telomere attrition to critical levels. Common and rare germline variants affect patterns of somatic mutation, including point mutations, structural variants and somatic retrotransposition. A collection of papers from the PCAWG Consortium describes non-coding mutations that drive cancer beyond those in the TERT promoter4; identifies new signatures of mutational processes that cause base substitutions, small insertions and deletions and structural variation5,6; analyses timings and patterns of tumour evolution7; describes the diverse transcriptional consequences of somatic mutation on splicing, expression levels, fusion genes and promoter activity8,9; and evaluates a range of more-specialized features of cancer genomes8,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18.
1,600 citations
Cited by
More filters
01 Jan 2006
TL;DR: Probability distributions of linear models for regression and classification are given in this article, along with a discussion of combining models and combining models in the context of machine learning and classification.
Abstract: Probability Distributions.- Linear Models for Regression.- Linear Models for Classification.- Neural Networks.- Kernel Methods.- Sparse Kernel Machines.- Graphical Models.- Mixture Models and EM.- Approximate Inference.- Sampling Methods.- Continuous Latent Variables.- Sequential Data.- Combining Models.
10,141 citations
Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute1, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust2, Wellcome Trust3, University of British Columbia4, University of Cambridge5, Oslo University Hospital6, The Breast Cancer Research Foundation7, University of Oslo8, University of Münster9, Université libre de Bruxelles10, German Cancer Research Center11, University of Iceland12, Erasmus University Rotterdam13, Paris Descartes University14, French Institute of Health and Medical Research15, University of Paris16, Broad Institute17, University of Bergen18, University of Queensland19, University of Oviedo20, University of Glasgow21, Harvard University22, United States Department of Veterans Affairs23, Netherlands Cancer Institute24, University of Kiel25, Radboud University Nijmegen26, King's College London27, Curie Institute28, University of New South Wales29, Bankstown Lidcombe Hospital30, University of Barcelona31
TL;DR: It is shown that hypermutation localized to small genomic regions, ‘kataegis’, is found in many cancer types, and this results reveal the diversity of mutational processes underlying the development of cancer.
Abstract: All cancers are caused by somatic mutations; however, understanding of the biological processes generating these mutations is limited. The catalogue of somatic mutations from a cancer genome bears the signatures of the mutational processes that have been operative. Here we analysed 4,938,362 mutations from 7,042 cancers and extracted more than 20 distinct mutational signatures. Some are present in many cancer types, notably a signature attributed to the APOBEC family of cytidine deaminases, whereas others are confined to a single cancer class. Certain signatures are associated with age of the patient at cancer diagnosis, known mutagenic exposures or defects in DNA maintenance, but many are of cryptic origin. In addition to these genome-wide mutational signatures, hypermutation localized to small genomic regions, 'kataegis', is found in many cancer types. The results reveal the diversity of mutational processes underlying the development of cancer, with potential implications for understanding of cancer aetiology, prevention and therapy.
7,904 citations
TL;DR: The 2016 edition of the World Health Organization classification of tumors of the hematopoietic and lymphoid tissues represents a revision of the prior classification rather than an entirely new classification and attempts to incorporate new clinical, prognostic, morphologic, immunophenotypic, and genetic data that have emerged since the last edition.
7,147 citations
TL;DR: This work has revealed the genomic landscapes of common forms of human cancer, which consists of a small number of “mountains” (genes altered in a high percentage of tumors) and a much larger number of "hills" (Genes altered infrequently).
Abstract: Over the past decade, comprehensive sequencing efforts have revealed the genomic landscapes of common forms of human cancer. For most cancer types, this landscape consists of a small number of “mountains” (genes altered in a high percentage of tumors) and a much larger number of “hills” (genes altered infrequently). To date, these studies have revealed ~140 genes that, when altered by intragenic mutations, can promote or “drive” tumorigenesis. A typical tumor contains two to eight of these “driver gene” mutations; the remaining mutations are passengers that confer no selective growth advantage. Driver genes can be classified into 12 signaling pathways that regulate three core cellular processes: cell fate, cell survival, and genome maintenance. A better understanding of these pathways is one of the most pressing needs in basic cancer research. Even now, however, our knowledge of cancer genomes is sufficient to guide the development of more effective approaches for reducing cancer morbidity and mortality.
6,441 citations
TL;DR: Treatment efficacy was associated with a higher number of mutations in the tumors, and a tumor-specific T cell response paralleled tumor regression in one patient, suggesting that the genomic landscape of lung cancers shapes response to anti–PD-1 therapy.
Abstract: Immune checkpoint inhibitors, which unleash a patient’s own T cells to kill tumors, are revolutionizing cancer treatment. To unravel the genomic determinants of response to this therapy, we used whole-exome sequencing of non–small cell lung cancers treated with pembrolizumab, an antibody targeting programmed cell death-1 (PD-1). In two independent cohorts, higher nonsynonymous mutation burden in tumors was associated with improved objective response, durable clinical benefit, and progression-free survival. Efficacy also correlated with the molecular smoking signature, higher neoantigen burden, and DNA repair pathway mutations; each factor was also associated with mutation burden. In one responder, neoantigen-specific CD8+ T cell responses paralleled tumor regression, suggesting that anti–PD-1 therapy enhances neoantigen-specific T cell reactivity. Our results suggest that the genomic landscape of lung cancers shapes response to anti–PD-1 therapy.
6,215 citations