scispace - formally typeset
D

David Forman

Researcher at International Agency for Research on Cancer

Publications -  310
Citations -  151035

David Forman is an academic researcher from International Agency for Research on Cancer. The author has contributed to research in topics: Cancer & Population. The author has an hindex of 95, co-authored 310 publications receiving 142982 citations. Previous affiliations of David Forman include Cancer Epidemiology Unit & Medical Research Council.

Papers
More filters
Reference EntryDOI

Eradication of Helicobacter pylori for non‐ulcer dyspepsia

TL;DR: H pylori eradication therapy has a small but statistically significant effect in H pyloris positive non-ulcer dyspepsia and an economic model suggests this modest benefit may still be cost-effective but more research is needed.
Reference EntryDOI

Pharmacological interventions for non‐ulcer dyspepsia

TL;DR: There is evidence that anti-secretory therapy may be effective in NUD and the trials evaluating prokinetic therapy are difficult to interpret as the meta-analysis result could have been due to publication bias.
Journal ArticleDOI

Reprint of: Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: Estimates for 40 countries in 2012

TL;DR: Up-to-date estimates of the cancer burden in Europe alongside the description of the varying distribution of common cancers at both the regional and country level provide a basis for establishing priorities to cancer control actions in Europe.
Journal ArticleDOI

Surgical management and outcomes of colorectal cancer liver metastases.

TL;DR: This population‐based study investigated the frequency of hepatic resections for colorectal cancer metastases across England and their outcome and found that liver resections are more common than other types of surgery.
Journal ArticleDOI

Automated Collection of Quality-of-Life Data: A Comparison of Paper and Computer Touch-Screen Questionnaires

TL;DR: Computer touch-screen QOL questionnaires were well accepted by cancer patients, with good data quality and reliability, and compared with paper questionnaires scanned by optical reading systems in terms of patients' acceptance, data quality, and reliability.