D
David G. Bogard
Researcher at University of Texas at Austin
Publications - 136
Citations - 5540
David G. Bogard is an academic researcher from University of Texas at Austin. The author has contributed to research in topics: Turbulence & Heat transfer. The author has an hindex of 34, co-authored 132 publications receiving 4876 citations. Previous affiliations of David G. Bogard include Purdue University.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Gas Turbine Film Cooling
David G. Bogard,Karen A. Thole +1 more
TL;DR: A review of the literature on the effects of freestream turbulence, surface curvature, and hole shape on the performance of film cooling is presented in this article. But, it is difficult to predict film cooling performance because of the inherent complex flowfields along the airfoil component surfaces in turbine engines.
Journal ArticleDOI
Film-cooling effectiveness downstream of a single row of holes with variable density ratio
TL;DR: In this article, a row of inclined holes that injected cryogenically cooled air across a flat, adiabatic test plate was used to study the effectiveness of film cooling.
Journal ArticleDOI
Burst detection with single-point velocity measurements
David G. Bogard,W. G. Tiederman +1 more
TL;DR: In this paper, an evaluation of the effectiveness of the VITA, Quadrant, TPAV, U -level, Positive slope, and VITa with slope burst-detection algorithms has been done by making direct comparisons with flow visualization.
Proceedings ArticleDOI
Film Cooling With Compound Angle Holes: Adiabatic Effectiveness
TL;DR: In this paper, film cooling effectiveness was studied experimentally in a flat plate test facility with zero pressure gradient using a single row of inclined holes, which injected high-density, cryogenically cooled air.
Proceedings ArticleDOI
Film Cooling With Compound Angle Holes: Heat Transfer
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors measured the heat transfer coefficient of a single row of holes laterally directed with a compound angle of 60 degrees, and showed that the results were combined with adiabatic effectiveness results to evaluate the overall performance of the three geometries.