scispace - formally typeset
D

David J. Kelly

Researcher at Trinity College, Dublin

Publications -  50
Citations -  1845

David J. Kelly is an academic researcher from Trinity College, Dublin. The author has contributed to research in topics: Population & Meles. The author has an hindex of 15, co-authored 42 publications receiving 1410 citations. Previous affiliations of David J. Kelly include Liverpool Hope University & Queen's University Belfast.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Bayesian stable isotope mixing models

TL;DR: This paper proposes a compositional mixture of the food sources corrected for various metabolic factors based on the isometric log‐ratio transform, which can apply a range of time series and non‐parametric smoothing relationships.
Journal ArticleDOI

Ecology and mode-of-life explain lifespan variation in birds and mammals

TL;DR: It is shown that, over and above the effect of body mass, the most important factor enabling longer lifespan is the ability to fly, which was true for non-volant species, where lifespan correlated positively with both arboreality and fossoriality.
Journal ArticleDOI

AVONET: morphological, ecological and geographical data for all birds.

Joseph A. Tobias, +114 more
- 24 Feb 2022 - 
TL;DR: The AVONET dataset as discussed by the authors contains comprehensive functional trait data for all birds, including six ecological variables, 11 continuous morphological traits, and information on range size and location, from 90,020 individuals of 11,009 extant bird species sampled from 181 countries.
Journal ArticleDOI

Neophobia and Dietary Conservatism:Two Distinct Processes?

TL;DR: Results from laboratory chicks are outlined that show neophobia to be easily deactivated by experience, which renders it unlikely to be an important force in wild birds, and evidence that the process of incorporation of novel food into the diet is not a simple one-stage process but includes at least four steps of assessment is reported.
Journal ArticleDOI

What, if anything, is the adaptive function of countershading?

TL;DR: It is argued that there is no conclusive evidence that countershading per se provides any selective advantage in terrestrial or aerial environments, however, the highly refined adaptations of some marine organisms to match the different background light conditions against which they are set when viewed from different aspects strongly suggest an adaptive advantage to countershaders in these environments.