Author
David Katzenstein
Other affiliations: Johns Hopkins University, Harvard University, Brown University ...read more
Bio: David Katzenstein is an academic researcher from Stanford University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Viral load & Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). The author has an hindex of 69, co-authored 280 publications receiving 21239 citations. Previous affiliations of David Katzenstein include Johns Hopkins University & Harvard University.
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
Brown University1, Harvard University2, International AIDS Society3, Stanford University4, University of British Columbia5, University of California, San Diego6, University of Alabama at Birmingham7, University of Colorado Denver8, Istituto Superiore di Sanità9, University of Paris10, University of California, San Francisco11
TL;DR: Accumulating data from clinical and pathogenesis studies continue to support early institution of potent antiretroviral therapy in patients with HIV infection, and increased complexity in HIV management requires ongoing monitoring of new data for optimal treatment of HIV infection.
Abstract: Objective. —To provide current recommendations for antiretroviral therapy for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) disease. Participants. —The original International AIDS Society—USA 13-member panel representing international expertise in antiretroviral research and care of patients with HIV infection. Evidence. —The following were considered: Newly available clinical and basic science study results, including phase 3 controlled trials; clinical, virological, and immunologic end-point data; interim analyses of studies presented at national and international research conferences; studies of HIV pathophysiology; and expert opinions of panel members. Recommendations were limited to the drugs available in mid 1997. Process. —The full panel met on a regular basis (July 1996, September 1996, November 1996, January 1997, and April 1997) since the publication of its initial recommendations in mid 1996 to review new research reports and interim results. The panel discussed whether and how new information changed its initial recommendations. The recommendations contained herein were determined by group consensus. Conclusions. —New data have provided a stronger rationale for earlier initiation of more aggressive therapy than previously recommended and reinforce the importance of careful selection of initial drug regimen for each patient for optimal long-term clinical benefit and adherence. The plasma viral load is a crucial element of clinical management for assessing prognosis and the effectiveness of therapy, and such testing must be done properly. Treatment failure is most readily indicated by a rising plasma HIV RNA level and should be confirmed prior to a change of treatment. Therapeutic approaches must be updated as new data, particularly on the long-term clinical effect of aggressive antiretroviral treatment, continue to emerge.
1,317 citations
••
Brown University1, Harvard University2, International AIDS Society3, Stanford University4, University of British Columbia5, University of California, San Diego6, University of Alabama at Birmingham7, University of Colorado Denver8, Istituto Superiore di Sanità9, University of Paris10, University of California, San Francisco11
TL;DR: New data have provided a stronger rationale for earlier initiation of more aggressive therapy than previously recommended and reinforce the importance of careful selection of initial drug regimen for each patient for optimal long-term clinical benefit and adherence.
Abstract: Objective.—To provide recommendations for antiretroviral therapy based on information
available in mid-1998.Participants.—An international panel of physicians with expertise in antiretroviral
research and care of patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection,
first convened by the International AIDS Society–USA in December 1995.Evidence.—The panel reviewed available clinical and basic science study
results (including phase 3 controlled trials; clinical, virologic, and immunologic
end point data; data presented at research conferences; and studies of HIV
pathophysiology); opinions of panel members were also considered. Recommendations
were limited to drugs available in mid-1998.Consensus Process.—Panel members monitor new clinical research reports and interim
results. The full panel meets regularly to discuss how the new information
may change treatment recommendations. Updated recommendations are developed
through consensus of the entire panel at each stage of development.Conclusions.—Accumulating data from clinical and pathogenesis studies continue
to support early institution of potent antiretroviral therapy in patients
with HIV infection. A variety of combination regimens show potency, expanding
choices for initial regimens for individual patients. Plasma HIV RNA assays
with increased sensitivity are important in monitoring therapeutic response;
however, more data are needed to determine precisely the HIV RNA levels that
define treatment failure. Long-term adverse drug effects are beginning to
emerge, requiring ongoing attention. Some issues regarding optimal long-term
approaches to antiretroviral management are unresolved. The increased complexity
in HIV management requires ongoing monitoring of new data for optimal treatment
of HIV infection.
1,151 citations
••
Brown University1, University of New South Wales2, University of Barcelona3, Columbia University4, Harvard University5, International AIDS Society6, Stanford University7, University of British Columbia8, University of California, San Diego9, University of Alabama at Birmingham10, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro11, University of Colorado Denver12, Istituto Superiore di Sanità13, University of Paris14, University of California, San Francisco15
TL;DR: The availability of new antiretroviral drugs has expanded treatment choices and the importance of adherence, emerging long-term complications of therapy, recognition and management of antireTroviral failure, and new monitoring tools are addressed.
Abstract: Objective To update recommendations for antiretroviral therapy for adult human
immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection, based on new information
and drugs that are available.
Participants
A 17-member international physician panel with antiretroviral research
and HIV patient care experience initially convened by the International AIDS
Society–USA in December 1995.
Evidence
Available clinical and basic science data including phase 3 controlled
trials; data on clinical, virologic, and immunologic end points; research
conference reports; HIV pathogenesis data; and panel expert opinion. Recommendations
were limited to therapies available (US Food and Drug Administration approved)
in 1999.
Consensus Process
The panel assesses new research reports and interim results and regularly
meets to consider how the new data affect therapy recommendations. Recommendations
are updated via full-panel consensus. Guidelines are presented as recommendations
if the supporting evidence warrants routine use in the particular situation
and as considerations if data are preliminary or incomplete but suggestive.
Conclusions
The availability of new antiretroviral drugs has expanded treatment
choices. The importance of adherence, emerging long-term complications of
therapy, recognition and management of antiretroviral failure, and new monitoring
tools are addressed. Optimal care requires individualized management and ongoing
attention to relevant scientific and clinical information in the field.
1,066 citations
••
TL;DR: The virologic target for patients with treatment failure is now a plasma HIV-1 RNA level below 50 copies/mL, making delivery of state-of-the-art care challenging.
Abstract: Context Guidelines for antiretroviral therapy are important for clinicians worldwide given the complexity of the field and the varied clinical situations in which these agents are used. The International AIDS Society–USA panel has updated its recommendations as warranted by new developments in the field. Objective To provide physicians and other human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) clinicians with current recommendations for the use of antiretroviral therapy in HIVinfected adults in circumstances for which there is relatively unrestricted access to drugs and monitoring tools. The recommendations are centered on 4 key issues: when to start antiretroviral therapy; what to start; when to change; and what to change. Antiretroviral therapy in special circumstances is also described. Data Sources and Study Selection A 16-member noncompensated panel was appointed, based on expertise in HIV research and patient care internationally. Data published or presented at selected scientific conferences from mid 2004 through May 2006 were identified and reviewed by all members of the panel. Data Extraction and Synthesis Data that might change previous guidelines were identified and reviewed. New guidelines were drafted by a writing committee and reviewed by the entire panel. Conclusions Antiretroviral therapy in adults continues to evolve rapidly, making delivery of state-of-the-art care challenging. Initiation of therapy continues to be recommended in all symptomatic persons and in asymptomatic persons after the CD4 cell count falls below 350/µL and before it declines to 200/µL. A nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor or a protease inhibitor boosted with low-dose ritonavir each combined with 2 nucleoside (or nucleotide) reverse transcriptase inhibitors is recommended with choice being based on the individual patient profile. Therapy should be changed when toxicity or intolerance mandate it or when treatment failure is documented. The virologic target for patients with treatment failure is now a plasma HIV-1 RNA level below 50 copies/mL. Adherence to antiretroviral therapy in the short-term and the long-term is crucial for treatment success and must be continually reinforced.
1,050 citations
••
TL;DR: In this article, a double-blind study evaluated treatment with either a single nucleoside or two nucleosides in adults infected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) whose CD4 cell counts were from 200 to 500 per cubic millimeter.
Abstract: Background This double-blind study evaluated treatment with either a single nucleoside or two nucleosides in adults infected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) whose CD4 cell counts were from 200 to 500 per cubic millimeter. Methods We randomly assigned 2467 HIV-1–infected patients (43 percent without prior antiretroviral treatment) to one of four daily regimens: 600 mg of zidovudine; 600 mg of zidovudine plus 400 mg of didanosine; 600 mg of zidovudine plus 2.25 mg of zalcitabine; or 400 mg of didanosine. The primary end point was a >50 percent decline in the CD4 cell count, development of the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), or death. Results Progression to the primary end point was more frequent with zidovudine alone (32 percent) than with zidovudine plus didanosine (18 percent; relative hazard ratio, 0.50; P<0.001), zidovudine plus zalcitabine (20 percent; relative hazard ratio, 0.54; P<0.001), or didanosine alone (22 percent; relative hazard ratio, 0.61; P<0.001). The relative ...
987 citations
Cited by
More filters
••
TL;DR: The Minimum Information for Publication of Quantitative Real-Time PCR Experiments (MIQE) guidelines target the reliability of results to help ensure the integrity of the scientific literature, promote consistency between laboratories, and increase experimental transparency.
Abstract: Background: Currently, a lack of consensus exists on how best to perform and interpret quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) experiments. The problem is exacerbated by a lack of sufficient experimental detail in many publications, which impedes a reader’s ability to evaluate critically the quality of the results presented or to repeat the experiments.
Content: The Minimum Information for Publication of Quantitative Real-Time PCR Experiments (MIQE) guidelines target the reliability of results to help ensure the integrity of the scientific literature, promote consistency between laboratories, and increase experimental transparency. MIQE is a set of guidelines that describe the minimum information necessary for evaluating qPCR experiments. Included is a checklist to accompany the initial submission of a manuscript to the publisher. By providing all relevant experimental conditions and assay characteristics, reviewers can assess the validity of the protocols used. Full disclosure of all reagents, sequences, and analysis methods is necessary to enable other investigators to reproduce results. MIQE details should be published either in abbreviated form or as an online supplement.
Summary: Following these guidelines will encourage better experimental practice, allowing more reliable and unequivocal interpretation of qPCR results.
12,469 citations
••
TL;DR: The recent declines in morbidity and mortality due to AIDS are attributable to the use of more intensive antiretroviral therapies.
Abstract: Background and Methods National surveillance data show recent, marked reductions in morbidity and mortality associated with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). To evaluate these declines, we analyzed data on 1255 patients, each of whom had at least one CD4+ count below 100 cells per cubic millimeter, who were seen at nine clinics specializing in the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection in eight U.S. cities from January 1994 through June 1997. Results Mortality among the patients declined from 29.4 per 100 person-years in 1995 to 8.8 per 100 person-years in the second quarter of 1997. There were reductions in mortality regardless of sex, race, age, and risk factors for transmission of HIV. The incidence of any of three major opportunistic infections (Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia, Mycobacterium avium complex disease, and cytomegalovirus retinitis) declined from 21.9 per 100 person-years in 1994 to 3.7 per 100 person-years by mid-1997. In a failure-rate model, increases in t...
9,116 citations
••
TL;DR: Strategies to assess and enhance medication adherence (or compliance) are reviewed, to help patients adhere to prescribed treatment regimens and avoid stigmatization.
Abstract: The full benefit of many effective medications will be achieved only if patients adhere to prescribed treatment regimens. Unfortunately, applying terms such as “noncompliant” and “nonadherent” to patients who do not consume every pill at the desired time can stigmatize them in their future relationships with health care providers. This article on medication adherence (or compliance) reviews strategies to assess and enhance this important aspect of patient care.
7,204 citations
••
TL;DR: The new STD treatment guidelines for gonorrhea, chlamydia, bacterial vaginosis, trichomonas, vulvovaginal candidiasis, pelvic inflammatory disease, genital warts, herpes simplex virus infection, syphilis, and scabies are reviewed.
Abstract: The MMWR series of publications is published by the Office of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Laboratory Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, GA 30333.
4,563 citations
••
TL;DR: These Guidelines were developed by the Panel* on Clinical Practices for Treatment of HIV Infection convened by the Department of Health and Human Services and the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation.
Abstract: SUMMARY The availability of an increasing number of antiretroviral agents and the rapid evolution of new information has introduced extraordinary complexity into the treatment of HIV-infected persons. In 1996, the Department of Health and Human Services and the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation convened the Panel on Clinical Practices for the Treatment of HIV to develop guidelines for the clinical management of HIV-infected adults and adolescents. This report recommends that care should be supervised by an expert, and makes recommendations for laboratory monitoring including plasma HIV RNA, CD4 cell counts and HIV drug resistance testing. The report also provides guidelines for antiretroviral therapy, including when to start treatment, what drugs to initiate, when to change therapy, and therapeutic options when changing therapy. Special considerations are provided for adolescents and pregnant women. As with treatment of other chronic conditions, therapeutic decisions require a mutual understanding between the patient and the health care provider regarding the benefits and risks of treatment. Antiretroviral regimens are complex, have major side effects, pose difficulty with adherence, and carry serious potential consequences from the development of viral resistance due to non-adherence to the drug regimen or suboptimal levels of antiretroviral agents. Patient education and involvement in therapeutic
4,321 citations