scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

David Palmer

Bio: David Palmer is an academic researcher from Los Alamos National Laboratory. The author has contributed to research in topics: Gamma-ray burst & Neutron star. The author has an hindex of 52, co-authored 174 publications receiving 14283 citations. Previous affiliations of David Palmer include Goddard Space Flight Center & Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
20 Aug 2004
TL;DR: The Swift mission as discussed by the authors is a multi-wavelength observatory for gamma-ray burst (GRB) astronomy, which is a first-of-its-kind autonomous rapid-slewing satellite for transient astronomy and pioneers the way for future rapid-reaction and multiwavelength missions.
Abstract: The Swift mission, scheduled for launch in 2004, is a multiwavelength observatory for gamma-ray burst (GRB) astronomy. It is a first-of-its-kind autonomous rapid-slewing satellite for transient astronomy and pioneers the way for future rapid-reaction and multiwavelength missions. It will be far more powerful than any previous GRB mission, observing more than 100 bursts yr � 1 and performing detailed X-ray and UV/optical afterglow observations spanning timescales from 1 minute to several days after the burst. The objectives are to (1) determine the origin of GRBs, (2) classify GRBs and search for new types, (3) study the interaction of the ultrarelativistic outflows of GRBs with their surrounding medium, and (4) use GRBs to study the early universe out to z >10. The mission is being developed by a NASA-led international collaboration. It will carry three instruments: a newgeneration wide-field gamma-ray (15‐150 keV) detector that will detect bursts, calculate 1 0 ‐4 0 positions, and trigger autonomous spacecraft slews; a narrow-field X-ray telescope that will give 5 00 positions and perform spectroscopy in the 0.2‐10 keV band; and a narrow-field UV/optical telescope that will operate in the 170‐ 600 nm band and provide 0B3 positions and optical finding charts. Redshift determinations will be made for most bursts. In addition to the primary GRB science, the mission will perform a hard X-ray survey to a sensitivity of � 1m crab (� 2;10 � 11 ergs cm � 2 s � 1 in the 15‐150 keV band), more than an order of magnitude better than HEAO 1 A-4. A flexible data and operations system will allow rapid follow-up observations of all types of

3,753 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The burst alert telescope (BAT) as discussed by the authors is one of three instruments on the Swift MIDEX spacecraft to study gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) and it detects the GRB and localizes the burst direction to an accuracy of 1-4 arcmin within 20 s after the start of the event.
Abstract: he burst alert telescope (BAT) is one of three instruments on the Swift MIDEX spacecraft to study gamma-ray bursts (GRBs). The BAT first detects the GRB and localizes the burst direction to an accuracy of 1–4 arcmin within 20 s after the start of the event. The GRB trigger initiates an autonomous spacecraft slew to point the two narrow field-of-view (FOV) instruments at the burst location within 20–70 s so to make follow-up X-ray and optical observations. The BAT is a wide-FOV, coded-aperture instrument with a CdZnTe detector plane. The detector plane is composed of 32,768 pieces of CdZnTe (4×4×2 mm), and the coded-aperture mask is composed of ∼52,000 pieces of lead (5×5×1 mm) with a 1-m separation between mask and detector plane. The BAT operates over the 15–150 keV energy range with ∼7 keV resolution, a sensitivity of ∼10−8 erg s−1 cm−2, and a 1.4 sr (half-coded) FOV. We expect to detect > 100 GRBs/year for a 2-year mission. The BAT also performs an all-sky hard X-ray survey with a sensitivity of ∼2 m Crab (systematic limit) and it serves as a hard X-ray transient monitor.

1,285 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
31 Aug 2006-Nature
TL;DR: A supernova is caught in the act of exploding, directly observing the shock break-out, which indicates that the GRB progenitor was a Wolf–Rayet star.
Abstract: A link between long γ-ray bursts (GRBs) and supernovae has been established, but whether there is a similar relationship between the weaker and softer X-ray flashes and supernovae is unclear. GRB/XRF 060218, spotted by the Swift satellite on 18 February this year, may supply that missing link. In the first of four papers on this novel burster, Campana et al. report the sighting of the X-ray signature of a shock break-out, possible evidence of a supernova in progress. Pian et al. report the optical discovery of a type Ic supernova 2006aj associated with GRB/XRF 060218. Soderberg et al. report radio and X-ray observations that show that XRF 060218 is 100 times less energetic than, but of a type that is ten times more common than cosmological GRBs. Mazzali et al. modelled the spectra and light curve of SN 2006aj to show that it had a much smaller explosion energy and ejected much less mass than other GRB-supernovae, suggesting that it was produced by a star with a mass was only about 20 times that of the Sun, leaving behind a neutron star, rather than a black hole. Observations of the close gamma-ray burst GRB 060218 and its connection to supernova SN 2006aj reveal the break-out of a shock wave driven by a mildly relativistic shell into the dense wind surrounding the GRB progenitor. These observation catch a supernova in the act of exploding. Although the link between long γ-ray bursts (GRBs) and supernovae has been established1,2,3,4, hitherto there have been no observations of the beginning of a supernova explosion and its intimate link to a GRB. In particular, we do not know how the jet that defines a γ-ray burst emerges from the star's surface, nor how a GRB progenitor explodes. Here we report observations of the relatively nearby GRB 060218 (ref. 5) and its connection to supernova SN 2006aj (ref. 6). In addition to the classical non-thermal emission, GRB 060218 shows a thermal component in its X-ray spectrum, which cools and shifts into the optical/ultraviolet band as time passes. We interpret these features as arising from the break-out of a shock wave driven by a mildly relativistic shell into the dense wind surrounding the progenitor7. We have caught a supernova in the act of exploding, directly observing the shock break-out, which indicates that the GRB progenitor was a Wolf–Rayet star.

835 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Neil Gehrels1, Craig L. Sarazin2, P. T. O'Brien3, Bing Zhang4, L. M. Barbier1, Scott Barthelmy1, A. J. Blustin5, David N. Burrows6, J. K. Cannizzo1, J. K. Cannizzo7, Jay Cummings1, Jay Cummings8, Michael R. Goad3, Stephen T. Holland1, Stephen T. Holland9, Cheryl Hurkett3, J. A. Kennea6, Andrew J. Levan3, C. B. Markwardt10, C. B. Markwardt1, Keith O. Mason5, Peter Mészáros6, M. J. Page5, David Palmer11, Evert Rol3, T. Sakamoto8, T. Sakamoto1, Richard Willingale3, Lorella Angelini7, Lorella Angelini1, Andrew P. Beardmore3, Patricia T. Boyd1, Patricia T. Boyd7, A. A. Breeveld5, Sergio Campana12, M. M. Chester6, Guido Chincarini13, Guido Chincarini14, L. R. Cominsky15, Giancarlo Cusumano13, M. de Pasquale5, Edward E. Fenimore11, Paolo Giommi, Caryl Gronwall6, Dirk Grupe6, Joanne E. Hill6, D. Hinshaw1, Jens Hjorth16, D. Hullinger1, D. Hullinger10, Kevin Hurley17, Sylvio Klose, Shiho Kobayashi6, Chryssa Kouveliotou18, Hans A. Krimm9, Hans A. Krimm1, Vanessa Mangano12, F. E. Marshall1, Katherine E. McGowan5, A. Moretti12, Richard Mushotzky1, Kazuhiro Nakazawa, Jay P. Norris1, John A. Nousek6, J. P. Osborne3, K. L. Page3, A. M. Parsons1, Sandeep K. Patel9, M. Perri, T. S. Poole5, P. Romano12, P. W. A. Roming6, Stuart Rosen5, G. Sato, Patricia Schady5, Alan P. Smale, Jesper Sollerman19, R. L. C. Starling20, Martin Still1, Martin Still9, Masaya Suzuki21, Gianpiero Tagliaferri12, Tadayuki Takahashi, Makoto Tashiro21, Jack Tueller1, Alan A. Wells3, Nicholas E. White1, Ralph A. M. J. Wijers20 
06 Oct 2005-Nature
TL;DR: In this article, the authors reported the detection of the X-ray afterglow from the short burst GRB 050509B and its location on the sky is near a luminous, non-star-forming elliptical galaxy at a redshift of 0.225.
Abstract: Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) are either ‘long and soft’, or ‘short and hard’. The long-duration type leave a strong afterglow and have been extensively studied. So we have a good idea of what causes them: explosions of massive stars in distant star-forming galaxies. Short GRBs, with no strong afterglow, were harder to pin down. The Swift satellite, launched last November, is designed to study bursts as soon as they happen. Having shown its worth with long GRBs (reported in the 18 August issue of Nature), Swift has now bagged a short burst, GRB 050509B, precisely measured its location and detected the X-ray afterglow. Four papers this week report on this and another recent short burst. Now, over 20 years after they were first recognized, the likely origin of the short GRBs is revealed as a merger between neutron stars of a binary system and the instantaneous production of a black hole. Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) come in two classes1: long (> 2 s), soft-spectrum bursts and short, hard events. Most progress has been made on understanding the long GRBs, which are typically observed at high redshift (z ≈ 1) and found in subluminous star-forming host galaxies. They are likely to be produced in core-collapse explosions of massive stars2. In contrast, no short GRB had been accurately (< 10″) and rapidly (minutes) located. Here we report the detection of the X-ray afterglow from—and the localization of—the short burst GRB 050509B. Its position on the sky is near a luminous, non-star-forming elliptical galaxy at a redshift of 0.225, which is the location one would expect3,4 if the origin of this GRB is through the merger of neutron-star or black-hole binaries. The X-ray afterglow was weak and faded below the detection limit within a few hours; no optical afterglow was detected to stringent limits, explaining the past difficulty in localizing short GRBs.

590 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
28 Apr 2005-Nature
TL;DR: In this article, the authors reported that SGR1806-20, a soft γ-ray repeater in Sagittarius, released a giant flare that has been called the brightest explosion ever recorded.
Abstract: On 27 December last year, SGR1806–20, a soft γ-ray repeater in Sagittarius, released a giant flare that has been called the brightest explosion ever recorded. SGRs are X-ray stars that sporadically emit low-energy γ-ray bursts. They are thought to be magnetars: neutron stars with observable emissions powered by magnetic dissipation. Five papers in this issue report initial and follow-up observations of this event. The data are remarkable: for instance in a fifth of a second, the flare released as much energy as the Sun radiates in a quarter of a million years. Such power can be explained by catastrophic global crust failure and magnetic reconnection on a magnetar. Releasing a hundred times the energy of the only two previous SGR giant flares, this may have been a once-in-a-lifetime event for astronomers, and for the star itself. Two classes of rotating neutron stars—soft γ-ray repeaters (SGRs) and anomalous X-ray pulsars—are magnetars1, whose X-ray emission is powered by a very strong magnetic field (B ≈ 1015 G). SGRs occasionally become ‘active’, producing many short X-ray bursts. Extremely rarely, an SGR emits a giant flare with a total energy about a thousand times higher than in a typical burst2,3,4. Here we report that SGR 1806–20 emitted a giant flare on 27 December 2004. The total (isotropic) flare energy is 2 × 1046 erg, which is about a hundred times higher than the other two previously observed giant flares. The energy release probably occurred during a catastrophic reconfiguration of the neutron star's magnetic field. If the event had occurred at a larger distance, but within 40 megaparsecs, it would have resembled a short, hard γ-ray burst, suggesting that flares from extragalactic SGRs may form a subclass of such bursts.

526 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal Article
TL;DR: The first direct detection of gravitational waves and the first observation of a binary black hole merger were reported in this paper, with a false alarm rate estimated to be less than 1 event per 203,000 years, equivalent to a significance greater than 5.1σ.
Abstract: On September 14, 2015 at 09:50:45 UTC the two detectors of the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory simultaneously observed a transient gravitational-wave signal. The signal sweeps upwards in frequency from 35 to 250 Hz with a peak gravitational-wave strain of 1.0×10(-21). It matches the waveform predicted by general relativity for the inspiral and merger of a pair of black holes and the ringdown of the resulting single black hole. The signal was observed with a matched-filter signal-to-noise ratio of 24 and a false alarm rate estimated to be less than 1 event per 203,000 years, equivalent to a significance greater than 5.1σ. The source lies at a luminosity distance of 410(-180)(+160) Mpc corresponding to a redshift z=0.09(-0.04)(+0.03). In the source frame, the initial black hole masses are 36(-4)(+5)M⊙ and 29(-4)(+4)M⊙, and the final black hole mass is 62(-4)(+4)M⊙, with 3.0(-0.5)(+0.5)M⊙c(2) radiated in gravitational waves. All uncertainties define 90% credible intervals. These observations demonstrate the existence of binary stellar-mass black hole systems. This is the first direct detection of gravitational waves and the first observation of a binary black hole merger.

4,375 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Adrian M. Price-Whelan1, B. M. Sipőcz1, Hans Moritz Günther1, P. L. Lim1, Steven M. Crawford1, S. Conseil1, D. L. Shupe1, M. W. Craig1, N. Dencheva1, Adam Ginsburg1, Jacob T VanderPlas1, Larry Bradley1, David Pérez-Suárez1, M. de Val-Borro1, T. L. Aldcroft1, Kelle L. Cruz1, Thomas P. Robitaille1, E. J. Tollerud1, C. Ardelean1, Tomáš Babej1, Y. P. Bach1, Matteo Bachetti1, A. V. Bakanov1, Steven P. Bamford1, Geert Barentsen1, Pauline Barmby1, Andreas Baumbach1, Katherine Berry1, F. Biscani1, Médéric Boquien1, K. A. Bostroem1, L. G. Bouma1, G. B. Brammer1, E. M. Bray1, H. Breytenbach1, H. Buddelmeijer1, D. J. Burke1, G. Calderone1, J. L. Cano Rodríguez1, Mihai Cara1, José Vinícius de Miranda Cardoso1, S. Cheedella1, Y. Copin1, Lia Corrales1, Devin Crichton1, D. DÁvella1, Christoph Deil1, É. Depagne1, J. P. Dietrich1, Axel Donath1, M. Droettboom1, Nicholas Earl1, T. Erben1, Sebastien Fabbro1, Leonardo Ferreira1, T. Finethy1, R. T. Fox1, Lehman H. Garrison1, S. L. J. Gibbons1, Daniel A. Goldstein1, Ralf Gommers1, Johnny P. Greco1, P. Greenfield1, A. M. Groener1, Frédéric Grollier1, A. Hagen1, P. Hirst1, Derek Homeier1, Anthony Horton1, Griffin Hosseinzadeh1, L. Hu1, J. S. Hunkeler1, Ž. Ivezić1, A. Jain1, T. Jenness1, G. Kanarek1, Sarah Kendrew1, Nicholas S. Kern1, Wolfgang Kerzendorf1, A. Khvalko1, J. King1, D. Kirkby1, A. M. Kulkarni1, Ashok Kumar1, Antony Lee1, D. Lenz1, S. P. Littlefair1, Zhiyuan Ma1, D. M. Macleod1, M. Mastropietro1, C. McCully1, S. Montagnac1, Brett M. Morris1, M. Mueller1, Stuart Mumford1, D. Muna1, Nicholas A. Murphy1, Stefan Nelson1, G. H. Nguyen1, Joe Philip Ninan1, M. Nöthe1, S. Ogaz1, Seog Oh1, J. K. Parejko1, N. R. Parley1, Sergio Pascual1, R. Patil1, A. A. Patil1, A. L. Plunkett1, Jason X. Prochaska1, T. Rastogi1, V. Reddy Janga1, J. Sabater1, Parikshit Sakurikar1, Michael Seifert1, L. E. Sherbert1, H. Sherwood-Taylor1, A. Y. Shih1, J. Sick1, M. T. Silbiger1, Sudheesh Singanamalla1, Leo Singer1, P. H. Sladen1, K. A. Sooley1, S. Sornarajah1, Ole Streicher1, P. Teuben1, Scott Thomas1, Grant R. Tremblay1, J. Turner1, V. Terrón1, M. H. van Kerkwijk1, A. de la Vega1, Laura L. Watkins1, B. A. Weaver1, J. Whitmore1, Julien Woillez1, Victor Zabalza1, Astropy Contributors1 
TL;DR: The Astropy project as discussed by the authors is a Python project supporting the development of open-source and openly developed Python packages that provide commonly needed functionality to the astronomical community, including the core package astropy.
Abstract: The Astropy Project supports and fosters the development of open-source and openly developed Python packages that provide commonly needed functionality to the astronomical community. A key element of the Astropy Project is the core package astropy, which serves as the foundation for more specialized projects and packages. In this article, we provide an overview of the organization of the Astropy project and summarize key features in the core package, as of the recent major release, version 2.0. We then describe the project infrastructure designed to facilitate and support development for a broader ecosystem of interoperable packages. We conclude with a future outlook of planned new features and directions for the broader Astropy Project.

4,044 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
20 Aug 2004
TL;DR: The Swift mission as discussed by the authors is a multi-wavelength observatory for gamma-ray burst (GRB) astronomy, which is a first-of-its-kind autonomous rapid-slewing satellite for transient astronomy and pioneers the way for future rapid-reaction and multiwavelength missions.
Abstract: The Swift mission, scheduled for launch in 2004, is a multiwavelength observatory for gamma-ray burst (GRB) astronomy. It is a first-of-its-kind autonomous rapid-slewing satellite for transient astronomy and pioneers the way for future rapid-reaction and multiwavelength missions. It will be far more powerful than any previous GRB mission, observing more than 100 bursts yr � 1 and performing detailed X-ray and UV/optical afterglow observations spanning timescales from 1 minute to several days after the burst. The objectives are to (1) determine the origin of GRBs, (2) classify GRBs and search for new types, (3) study the interaction of the ultrarelativistic outflows of GRBs with their surrounding medium, and (4) use GRBs to study the early universe out to z >10. The mission is being developed by a NASA-led international collaboration. It will carry three instruments: a newgeneration wide-field gamma-ray (15‐150 keV) detector that will detect bursts, calculate 1 0 ‐4 0 positions, and trigger autonomous spacecraft slews; a narrow-field X-ray telescope that will give 5 00 positions and perform spectroscopy in the 0.2‐10 keV band; and a narrow-field UV/optical telescope that will operate in the 170‐ 600 nm band and provide 0B3 positions and optical finding charts. Redshift determinations will be made for most bursts. In addition to the primary GRB science, the mission will perform a hard X-ray survey to a sensitivity of � 1m crab (� 2;10 � 11 ergs cm � 2 s � 1 in the 15‐150 keV band), more than an order of magnitude better than HEAO 1 A-4. A flexible data and operations system will allow rapid follow-up observations of all types of

3,753 citations

01 Apr 2003
TL;DR: The EnKF has a large user group, and numerous publications have discussed applications and theoretical aspects of it as mentioned in this paper, and also presents new ideas and alternative interpretations which further explain the success of the EnkF.
Abstract: The purpose of this paper is to provide a comprehensive presentation and interpretation of the Ensemble Kalman Filter (EnKF) and its numerical implementation. The EnKF has a large user group, and numerous publications have discussed applications and theoretical aspects of it. This paper reviews the important results from these studies and also presents new ideas and alternative interpretations which further explain the success of the EnKF. In addition to providing the theoretical framework needed for using the EnKF, there is also a focus on the algorithmic formulation and optimal numerical implementation. A program listing is given for some of the key subroutines. The paper also touches upon specific issues such as the use of nonlinear measurements, in situ profiles of temperature and salinity, and data which are available with high frequency in time. An ensemble based optimal interpolation (EnOI) scheme is presented as a cost-effective approach which may serve as an alternative to the EnKF in some applications. A fairly extensive discussion is devoted to the use of time correlated model errors and the estimation of model bias.

2,975 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A binary neutron star coalescence candidate (later designated GW170817) with merger time 12:41:04 UTC was observed through gravitational waves by the Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo detectors.
Abstract: On 2017 August 17 a binary neutron star coalescence candidate (later designated GW170817) with merger time 12:41:04 UTC was observed through gravitational waves by the Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo detectors. The Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor independently detected a gamma-ray burst (GRB 170817A) with a time delay of $\sim 1.7\,{\rm{s}}$ with respect to the merger time. From the gravitational-wave signal, the source was initially localized to a sky region of 31 deg2 at a luminosity distance of ${40}_{-8}^{+8}$ Mpc and with component masses consistent with neutron stars. The component masses were later measured to be in the range 0.86 to 2.26 $\,{M}_{\odot }$. An extensive observing campaign was launched across the electromagnetic spectrum leading to the discovery of a bright optical transient (SSS17a, now with the IAU identification of AT 2017gfo) in NGC 4993 (at $\sim 40\,{\rm{Mpc}}$) less than 11 hours after the merger by the One-Meter, Two Hemisphere (1M2H) team using the 1 m Swope Telescope. The optical transient was independently detected by multiple teams within an hour. Subsequent observations targeted the object and its environment. Early ultraviolet observations revealed a blue transient that faded within 48 hours. Optical and infrared observations showed a redward evolution over ~10 days. Following early non-detections, X-ray and radio emission were discovered at the transient's position $\sim 9$ and $\sim 16$ days, respectively, after the merger. Both the X-ray and radio emission likely arise from a physical process that is distinct from the one that generates the UV/optical/near-infrared emission. No ultra-high-energy gamma-rays and no neutrino candidates consistent with the source were found in follow-up searches. These observations support the hypothesis that GW170817 was produced by the merger of two neutron stars in NGC 4993 followed by a short gamma-ray burst (GRB 170817A) and a kilonova/macronova powered by the radioactive decay of r-process nuclei synthesized in the ejecta.

2,746 citations