scispace - formally typeset
D

Debbie A Lawlor

Researcher at University of Bristol

Publications -  1118
Citations -  118183

Debbie A Lawlor is an academic researcher from University of Bristol. The author has contributed to research in topics: Population & Body mass index. The author has an hindex of 147, co-authored 1114 publications receiving 101123 citations. Previous affiliations of Debbie A Lawlor include Southampton General Hospital & University of Vermont.

Papers
More filters

Stratification by Smoking Status Reveals an Association of CHRNA5-A3-B4 Genotype with Body Mass Index in Never Smokers

Amy E Taylor, +63 more
TL;DR: A single nucleotide polymorphism in the CHRNA5-A3-B4 gene cluster associated with heaviness of smoking within smokers is found to be associated with lower body mass index per minor allele in current smokers and the opposite association with BMI in never and current smokers, demonstrating that novel associations may be obscured by hidden population sub-structure.
Journal ArticleDOI

Derivative estimation for longitudinal data analysis: Examining features of blood pressure measured repeatedly during pregnancy.

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors developed derivative estimation for two standard approaches-polynomial mixed models and spline mixed models, and compared their performance with an established method-principal component analysis through conditional expectation through a simulation study.
Journal ArticleDOI

Metabolomics datasets in the Born in Bradford cohort

TL;DR: The metabolomic data available in BiB is described, profiled during pregnancy, in cord blood and during early life in the offspring, which can be examined alongside the BiB cohorts’ extensive phenotype data from questionnaires, medical, educational and social record linkage, and other ‘omics data.
Journal ArticleDOI

Effect of discussion and deliberation on public's views of priority setting. More data are needed for readers to make judgment about study.

Barbara Hanratty, +1 more
- 17 Jul 1999 - 
TL;DR: The results of this study do not justify the conclusions, and the omission of the core of the results brings into question the external and internal validity of the paper.