Author
Deborah P. Saunders
Other affiliations: Health Sciences North
Bio: Deborah P. Saunders is an academic researcher from Northern Ontario School of Medicine. The author has contributed to research in topics: Mucositis & Head and neck cancer. The author has an hindex of 15, co-authored 30 publications receiving 2130 citations. Previous affiliations of Deborah P. Saunders include Health Sciences North.
Papers
More filters
••
McMaster University1, Dalhousie University2, University of Calgary3, Charité4, Kaiser Permanente5, University of Auckland6, Matsumoto Dental University7, University of California, Los Angeles8, University of Florence9, University of Alberta10, University of Sheffield11, University of Toronto12, McGill University13, Jordan Hospital14, University of Oxford15, University of Southampton16, University of Alabama at Birmingham17, Medical University of Graz18, Aarhus University19, University of Victoria20, University of British Columbia21, University of Oulu22, International Osteoporosis Foundation23, King Saud University24, Laval University25, University of Cambridge26
TL;DR: In those patients at high risk for the development of ONJ, including cancer patients receiving high‐dose BP or Dmab therapy, consideration should be given to withholding antiresorptive therapy following extensive oral surgery until the surgical site heals with mature mucosal coverage.
Abstract: This work provides a systematic review of the literature from January 2003 to April 2014 pertaining to the incidence, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ), and offers recommendations for its management based on multidisciplinary international consensus. ONJ is associated with oncology-dose parenteral antiresorptive therapy of bisphosphonates (BP) and denosumab (Dmab). The incidence of ONJ is greatest in the oncology patient population (1% to 15%), where high doses of these medications are used at frequent intervals. In the osteoporosis patient population, the incidence of ONJ is estimated at 0.001% to 0.01%, marginally higher than the incidence in the general population (<0.001%). New insights into the pathophysiology of ONJ include antiresorptive effects of BPs and Dmab, effects of BPs on gamma delta T-cells and on monocyte and macrophage function, as well as the role of local bacterial infection, inflammation, and necrosis. Advances in imaging include the use of cone beam computerized tomography assessing cortical and cancellous architecture with lower radiation exposure, magnetic resonance imaging, bone scanning, and positron emission tomography, although plain films often suffice. Other risk factors for ONJ include glucocorticoid use, maxillary or mandibular bone surgery, poor oral hygiene, chronic inflammation, diabetes mellitus, ill-fitting dentures, as well as other drugs, including antiangiogenic agents. Prevention strategies for ONJ include elimination or stabilization of oral disease prior to initiation of antiresorptive agents, as well as maintenance of good oral hygiene. In those patients at high risk for the development of ONJ, including cancer patients receiving high-dose BP or Dmab therapy, consideration should be given to withholding antiresorptive therapy following extensive oral surgery until the surgical site heals with mature mucosal coverage. Management of ONJ is based on the stage of the disease, size of the lesions, and the presence of contributing drug therapy and comorbidity. Conservative therapy includes topical antibiotic oral rinses and systemic antibiotic therapy. Localized surgical debridement is indicated in advanced nonresponsive disease and has been successful. Early data have suggested enhanced osseous wound healing with teriparatide in those without contraindications for its use. Experimental therapy includes bone marrow stem cell intralesional transplantation, low-level laser therapy, local platelet-derived growth factor application, hyperbaric oxygen, and tissue grafting.
832 citations
••
University of Copenhagen1, University Medical Center Groningen2, College of Health Sciences, Bahrain3, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust4, Indiana University5, University of Belgrade6, Federal University of São Paulo7, University of Michigan8, Griffith University9, Carolinas Medical Center10, University of Gothenburg11, University of Maryland, Baltimore12, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center13
TL;DR: Salivary gland hypofunction and xerostomia are induced by radiotherapy in the head and neck region depending on the cumulative radiation dose to the gland tissue, and treatment focus should be on optimized/new approaches to further reduce the doses to the parotids.
Abstract: This systematic review aimed to assess the literature for prevalence, severity, and impact on quality of life of salivary gland hypofunction and xerostomia induced by cancer therapies. The electronic databases of MEDLINE/PubMed and EMBASE were searched for articles published in English since the 1989 NIH Development Consensus Conference on the Oral Complications of Cancer Therapies until 2008 inclusive. Two independent reviewers extracted information regarding study design, study population, interventions, outcome measures, results and conclusions for each article. The inclusion criteria were met by 184 articles covering salivary gland hypofunction and xerostomia induced by conventional, 3D conformal radiotherapy or intensity-modulated radiotherapy in head and neck cancer patients, cancer chemotherapy, total body irradiation/hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, radioactive iodine treatment, and immunotherapy. Salivary gland hypofunction and xerostomia are induced by radiotherapy in the head and neck region depending on the cumulative radiation dose to the gland tissue. Treatment focus should be on optimized/new approaches to further reduce the dose to the parotids, and particularly submandibular and minor salivary glands, as these glands are major contributors to moistening of oral tissues. Other cancer treatments also induce salivary gland hypofunction, although to a lesser severity, and in the case of chemotherapy and immunotherapy, the adverse effect is temporary. Fields of sparse literature included pediatric cancer populations, cancer chemotherapy, radioactive iodine treatment, total body irradiation/hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, and immunotherapy.
343 citations
••
TL;DR: A case for a collaborative and integrated multidisciplinary approach to the management of patients undergoing radiation therapy for the head and neck is made, with specific recommendation to include knowledgeable and experienced oral health care professionals in the treatment team.
Abstract: Patients undergoing radiation therapy for the head and neck are susceptible to a significant and often abrupt deterioration in their oral health. The oral morbidities of radiation therapy include but are not limited to an increased susceptibility to dental caries and periodontal disease. They also include profound and often permanent functional and sensory changes involving the oral soft tissue. These changes range from oral mucositis experienced during and soon after treatment, mucosal opportunistic infections, neurosensory disorders, and tissue fibrosis. Many of the oral soft tissue changes following radiation therapy are difficult challenges to the patients and their caregivers and require life-long strategies to alleviate their deleterious effect on basic life functions and on the quality of life. We discuss the presentation, prognosis, and management strategies of the dental structure and oral soft tissue morbidities resulting from the administration of therapeutic radiation in head and neck patient. A case for a collaborative and integrated multidisciplinary approach to the management of these patients is made, with specific recommendation to include knowledgeable and experienced oral health care professionals in the treatment team.
335 citations
••
University of Copenhagen1, University Medical Center Groningen2, University of Delaware3, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust4, Indiana University5, University of Belgrade6, Federal University of São Paulo7, University of Michigan8, Griffith University9, Carolinas Medical Center10, University of Gothenburg11, University of Maryland, Baltimore12, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center13
TL;DR: There is evidence that salivary gland hypofunction and xerostomia induced by cancer therapies can be prevented or symptoms be minimized to some degree, depending on the type of cancer treatment.
Abstract: This systematic review aimed to assess the literature for management strategies and economic impact of salivary gland hypofunction and xerostomia induced by cancer therapies and to determine the quality of evidence-based management recommendations. The electronic databases of MEDLINE/PubMed and EMBASE were searched for articles published in English since the 1989 NIH Development Consensus Conference on the Oral Complications of Cancer Therapies until 2008 inclusive. For each article, two independent reviewers extracted information regarding study design, study population, interventions, outcome measures, results, and conclusions. Seventy-two interventional studies met the inclusion criteria. In addition, 49 intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) studies were included as a management strategy aiming for less salivary gland damage. Management guideline recommendations were drawn up for IMRT, amifostine, muscarinic agonist stimulation, oral mucosal lubricants, acupuncture, and submandibular gland transfer. There is evidence that salivary gland hypofunction and xerostomia induced by cancer therapies can be prevented or symptoms be minimized to some degree, depending on the type of cancer treatment. Management guideline recommendations are provided for IMRT, amifostine, muscarinic agonist stimulation, oral mucosal lubricants, acupuncture, and submandibular gland transfer. Fields of sparse literature identified included effects of gustatory and masticatory stimulation, specific oral mucosal lubricant formulas, submandibular gland transfer, acupuncture, hyperbaric oxygen treatment, management strategies in pediatric cancer populations, and the economic consequences of salivary gland hypofunction and xerostomia.
230 citations
••
Tel Aviv University1, Sheba Medical Center2, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai3, University of Connecticut Health Center4, University of Michigan5, American Society of Clinical Oncology6, Hofstra University7, Stony Brook University8, University of Florida9, McMaster University10, Dalhousie University11, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre12, University of Rochester13, Vanderbilt University14, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill15, Case Western Reserve University16, Stanford University17, Aarhus University18, Northern Ontario School of Medicine19
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors provide guidance regarding best practices in the prevention and management of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) in patients with cancer.
Abstract: PURPOSETo provide guidance regarding best practices in the prevention and management of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) in patients with cancer.METHODSMultinational Association ...
186 citations
Cited by
More filters
••
TL;DR: The American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons (AAOMS) developed guidelines for medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) in 2007 and 2009 as mentioned in this paper.
2,176 citations
••
University of Alabama at Birmingham1, University of South Florida2, Vanderbilt University3, City of Hope National Medical Center4, Fox Chase Cancer Center5, University Of Tennessee System6, Brigham and Women's Hospital7, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance8, Case Western Reserve University9, Roswell Park Cancer Institute10, Northwestern University11, Harvard University12, University of Nebraska Medical Center13, University of Utah14, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center15
TL;DR: This manuscript focuses on the NCCN Guidelines Panel recommendations for the workup, primary treatment, risk reduction strategies, and surveillance specific to DCIS.
Abstract: Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast represents a heterogeneous group of neoplastic lesions in the breast ducts. The goal for management of DCIS is to prevent the development of invasive breast cancer. This manuscript focuses on the NCCN Guidelines Panel recommendations for the workup, primary treatment, risk reduction strategies, and surveillance specific to DCIS.
1,545 citations
••
TL;DR: The goal of this systematic review was to update the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer and International Society of Oral Oncology Clinical Practice Guidelines for mucositis.
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Mucositis is a highly significant, and sometimes dose-limiting, toxicity of cancer therapy. The goal of this systematic review was to update the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer and International Society of Oral Oncology (MASCC/ISOO) Clinical Practice Guidelines for mucositis. METHODS: A literature search was conducted to identify eligible published articles, based on predefined inclusion/exclusion criteria. Each article was independently reviewed by 2 reviewers. Studies were rated according to the presence of major and minor flaws as per previously published criteria. The body of evidence for each intervention, in each treatment setting, was assigned a level of evidence, based on previously published criteria. Guidelines were developed based on the level of evidence, with 3 possible guideline determinations: recommendation, suggestion, or no guideline possible. RESULTS: The literature search identified 8279 papers, 1032 of which were retrieved for detailed evaluation based on titles and abstracts. Of these, 570 qualified for final inclusion in the systematic reviews. Sixteen new guidelines were developed for or against the use of various interventions in specific treatment settings. In total, the MASCC/ISOO Mucositis Guidelines now include 32 guidelines: 22 for oral mucositis and 10 for gastrointestinal mucositis. This article describes these updated guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: The updated MASCC/ISOO Clinical Practice Guidelines for mucositis will help clinicians provide evidence-based management of mucositis secondary to cancer therapy.
963 citations
••
Loyola University Chicago1, Cornell University2, University of Wisconsin-Madison3, University of Cincinnati Academic Health Center4, Harvard University5, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center6, University of California, San Francisco7, American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists8, University of Vermont Medical Center9, University of New Mexico10, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai11, Australian Catholic University12, Emory University13
TL;DR: A large number of the patients in this study had atypical femur fracture and the results confirmed the need for further investigation into the mechanisms leading to and effects of these fractures.
768 citations
••
University of Connecticut1, University of Adelaide2, Winthrop-University Hospital3, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center4, City of Hope National Medical Center5, Virginia Commonwealth University6, University of Tennessee Health Science Center7, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens8, Brigham and Women's Hospital9, University of Rochester10
685 citations