scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Deviderjit Singh Sivia

Bio: Deviderjit Singh Sivia is an academic researcher. The author has contributed to research in topics: Estimation theory & Nested sampling algorithm. The author has an hindex of 1, co-authored 1 publications receiving 1946 citations.

Papers
More filters
Book
01 Jan 1996
TL;DR: This tutorial jumps right in to the power ofparameter estimation without dragging you through the basic concepts of parameter estimation.
Abstract: 1. The Basics 2. Parameter Estimation I 3. Parameter Estimation II 4. Model Selection 5. Assigning Probabilities 6. Non-parametric Estimation 7. Experimental Design 8. Least-Squares Extensions 9. Nested Sampling 10. Quantification Appendices Bibliography

1,947 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, a fast Markov chain Monte Carlo exploration of cosmological parameter space is presented, which combines data from the CMB, HST Key Project, 2dF galaxy redshift survey, supernovae type Ia and big-bang nucleosynthesis.
Abstract: We present a fast Markov chain Monte Carlo exploration of cosmological parameter space. We perform a joint analysis of results from recent cosmic microwave background ~CMB! experiments and provide parameter constraints, including s 8, from the CMB independent of other data. We next combine data from the CMB, HST Key Project, 2dF galaxy redshift survey, supernovae type Ia and big-bang nucleosynthesis. The Monte Carlo method allows the rapid investigation of a large number of parameters, and we present results from 6 and 9 parameter analyses of flat models, and an 11 parameter analysis of non-flat models. Our results include constraints on the neutrino mass ( mn&0.3 eV), equation of state of the dark energy, and the tensor amplitude, as well as demonstrating the effect of additional parameters on the base parameter constraints. In a series of appendixes we describe the many uses of importance sampling, including computing results from new data and accuracy correction of results generated from an approximate method. We also discuss the different ways of converting parameter samples to parameter constraints, the effect of the prior, assess the goodness of fit and consistency, and describe the use of analytic marginalization over normalization parameters.

3,550 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors build on the work of Shaw et al. and present three new methods for sampling and evidence evaluation from distributions that may contain multiple modes and significant degeneracies in very high dimensions.
Abstract: In performing a Bayesian analysis of astronomical data, two difficult problems often emerge. First, in estimating the parameters of some model for the data, the resulting posterior distribution may be multimodal or exhibit pronounced (curving) degeneracies, which can cause problems for traditional Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling methods. Secondly, in selecting between a set of competing models, calculation of the Bayesian evidence for each model is computationally expensive using existing methods such as thermodynamic integration. The nested sampling method introduced by Skilling, has greatly reduced the computational expense of calculating evidence and also produces posterior inferences as a by-product. This method has been applied successfully in cosmological applications by Mukherjee, Parkinson & Liddle, but their implementation was efficient only for unimodal distributions without pronounced degeneracies. Shaw, Bridges & Hobson recently introduced a clustered nested sampling method which is significantly more efficient in sampling from multimodal posteriors and also determines the expectation and variance of the final evidence from a single run of the algorithm, hence providing a further increase in efficiency. In this paper, we build on the work of Shaw et al. and present three new methods for sampling and evidence evaluation from distributions that may contain multiple modes and significant degeneracies in very high dimensions; we also present an even more efficient technique for estimating the uncertainty on the evaluated evidence. These methods lead to a further substantial improvement in sampling efficiency and robustness, and are applied to two toy problems to demonstrate the accuracy and economy of the evidence calculation and parameter estimation. Finally, we discuss the use of these methods in performing Bayesian object detection in astronomical data sets, and show that they significantly outperform existing MCMC techniques. An implementation of our methods will be publicly released shortly.

1,396 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors estimate the radius to the Galactic center, R-0, to be 8.34 +/- 0.16 kpc, a circular rotation speed at the Sun, Theta(0), to be 240 +/- 8 km s(-1), and a rotation curve that is nearly flat.
Abstract: Over 100 trigonometric parallaxes and proper motions for masers associated with young, high- mass stars have been measured with the Bar and Spiral Structure Legacy Survey, a Very Long Baseline Array key science project, the European VLBI Network, and the Japanese VLBI Exploration of Radio Astrometry project. These measurements provide strong evidence for the existence of spiral arms in the MilkyWay, accurately locating many arm segments and yielding spiral pitch angles ranging from about 7 degrees to 20 degrees. The widths of spiral arms increase with distance from the Galactic center. Fitting axially symmetric models of the MilkyWay with the three- dimensional position and velocity information and conservative priors for the solar and average source peculiar motions, we estimate the distance to the Galactic center, R-0, to be 8.34 +/- 0.16 kpc, a circular rotation speed at the Sun, Theta(0), to be 240 +/- 8 km s(-1), and a rotation curve that is nearly flat ( i. e., a slope of -0.2 +/- 0.4 km s(-1) kpc(-1)) between Galactocentric radii of approximate to 5 and 16 kpc. Assuming a " universal" spiral galaxy form for the rotation curve, we estimate the thin disk scale length to be 2.44 +/- 0.16 kpc. With this large data set, the parameters R-0 and Theta(0) are no longer highly correlated and are relatively insensitive to different forms of the rotation curve. If one adopts a theoretically motivated prior that high- mass star forming regions are in nearly circular Galactic orbits, we estimate a global solar motion component in the direction of Galactic rotation, V-circle dot = 14.6 +/- 5.0 km s(-1). While Theta(0) and V-circle dot are significantly correlated, the sum of these parameters is well constrained, Theta(0) + V circle dot = 255.2 +/- 5.1 km s(-1), as is the angular speed of the Sun in its orbit about the Galactic center, ( Theta(0) + V-circle dot)/R-0 = 30.57 +/- 0.43 km s(-1) kpc(-1). These parameters improve the accuracy of estimates of the accelerations of the Sun and the Hulse-Taylor binary pulsar in their Galactic orbits, significantly reducing the uncertainty in tests of gravitational radiation predicted by general relativity.

1,334 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Three new methods for sampling and evidence evaluation from distributions that may contain multiple modes and significant degeneracies in very high dimensions are presented, leading to a further substantial improvement in sampling efficiency and robustness and an even more efficient technique for estimating the uncertainty on the evaluated evidence.
Abstract: In performing a Bayesian analysis of astronomical data, two difficult problems often emerge. First, in estimating the parameters of some model for the data, the resulting posterior distribution may be multimodal or exhibit pronounced (curving) degeneracies, which can cause problems for traditional MCMC sampling methods. Second, in selecting between a set of competing models, calculation of the Bayesian evidence for each model is computationally expensive. The nested sampling method introduced by Skilling (2004), has greatly reduced the computational expense of calculating evidences and also produces posterior inferences as a by-product. This method has been applied successfully in cosmological applications by Mukherjee et al. (2006), but their implementation was efficient only for unimodal distributions without pronounced degeneracies. Shaw et al. (2007), recently introduced a clustered nested sampling method which is significantly more efficient in sampling from multimodal posteriors and also determines the expectation and variance of the final evidence from a single run of the algorithm, hence providing a further increase in efficiency. In this paper, we build on the work of Shaw et al. and present three new methods for sampling and evidence evaluation from distributions that may contain multiple modes and significant degeneracies; we also present an even more efficient technique for estimating the uncertainty on the evaluated evidence. These methods lead to a further substantial improvement in sampling efficiency and robustness, and are applied to toy problems to demonstrate the accuracy and economy of the evidence calculation and parameter estimation. Finally, we discuss the use of these methods in performing Bayesian object detection in astronomical datasets.

1,264 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Luca Amendola1, Stephen Appleby2, Anastasios Avgoustidis3, David Bacon4, Tessa Baker5, Marco Baldi6, Marco Baldi7, Marco Baldi8, Nicola Bartolo9, Nicola Bartolo7, Alain Blanchard10, Camille Bonvin11, Stefano Borgani12, Stefano Borgani7, Enzo Branchini13, Enzo Branchini7, Clare Burrage3, Stefano Camera, Carmelita Carbone14, Carmelita Carbone7, Luciano Casarini15, Luciano Casarini16, Mark Cropper17, Claudia de Rham18, J. P. Dietrich19, Cinzia Di Porto, Ruth Durrer11, Anne Ealet, Pedro G. Ferreira5, Fabio Finelli7, Juan Garcia-Bellido20, Tommaso Giannantonio19, Luigi Guzzo14, Luigi Guzzo7, Alan Heavens18, Lavinia Heisenberg21, Catherine Heymans22, Henk Hoekstra23, Lukas Hollenstein, Rory Holmes, Zhiqi Hwang24, Knud Jahnke25, Thomas D. Kitching17, Tomi S. Koivisto26, Martin Kunz11, Giuseppe Vacca27, Eric V. Linder28, M. March29, Valerio Marra30, Carlos Martins31, Elisabetta Majerotto11, Dida Markovic32, David J. E. Marsh33, Federico Marulli7, Federico Marulli8, Richard Massey34, Yannick Mellier35, Francesco Montanari36, David F. Mota16, Nelson J. Nunes37, Will J. Percival32, Valeria Pettorino38, Valeria Pettorino39, Cristiano Porciani, Claudia Quercellini, Justin I. Read40, Massimiliano Rinaldi41, Domenico Sapone42, Ignacy Sawicki43, Roberto Scaramella, Constantinos Skordis43, Constantinos Skordis44, Fergus Simpson45, Andy Taylor22, Shaun A. Thomas, Roberto Trotta18, Licia Verde45, Filippo Vernizzi39, Adrian Vollmer, Yun Wang46, Jochen Weller19, T. G. Zlosnik47 
TL;DR: Euclid is a European Space Agency medium-class mission selected for launch in 2020 within the cosmic vision 2015-2025 program as discussed by the authors, which will explore the expansion history of the universe and the evolution of cosmic structures by measuring shapes and red-shift of galaxies as well as the distribution of clusters of galaxies over a large fraction of the sky.
Abstract: Euclid is a European Space Agency medium-class mission selected for launch in 2020 within the cosmic vision 2015–2025 program. The main goal of Euclid is to understand the origin of the accelerated expansion of the universe. Euclid will explore the expansion history of the universe and the evolution of cosmic structures by measuring shapes and red-shifts of galaxies as well as the distribution of clusters of galaxies over a large fraction of the sky. Although the main driver for Euclid is the nature of dark energy, Euclid science covers a vast range of topics, from cosmology to galaxy evolution to planetary research. In this review we focus on cosmology and fundamental physics, with a strong emphasis on science beyond the current standard models. We discuss five broad topics: dark energy and modified gravity, dark matter, initial conditions, basic assumptions and questions of methodology in the data analysis. This review has been planned and carried out within Euclid’s Theory Working Group and is meant to provide a guide to the scientific themes that will underlie the activity of the group during the preparation of the Euclid mission.

1,211 citations