Author
Didier Peiffert
Other affiliations: Centre national de la recherche scientifique
Bio: Didier Peiffert is an academic researcher from University of Lorraine. The author has contributed to research in topics: Brachytherapy & Radiation therapy. The author has an hindex of 38, co-authored 231 publications receiving 5970 citations. Previous affiliations of Didier Peiffert include Centre national de la recherche scientifique.
Topics: Brachytherapy, Radiation therapy, Prostate cancer, Anal cancer, Medicine
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
TL;DR: The concomitant use of radiotherapy and chemotherapy resulted in a significantly improved locoregional control rate and a reduction of the need for colostomy in patients with locally advanced anal cancer without a significant increase in late side effects.
Abstract: PURPOSETo investigate the potential gain of the concomitant use of radiotherapy and chemotherapy in improving local control and reducing the need for colostomy, a randomized phase III trial was performed in patients with locally advanced anal cancer.MATERIALS AND METHODSFrom 1987 to 1994, 110 patients were randomized between radiotherapy alone and a combination of radiotherapy and chemotherapy. The patients had T3-4NO-3 or T1-2N1-3 anal cancer. Radiotherapy consisted of 45 Gy given in 5 weeks, with a daily dose of 1.8 Gy. After a rest period of 6 weeks, a boost of 20 or 15 Gy was given in case of partial or complete response, respectively. Surgical resection as part of the primary treatment was performed if possible in patients who had not responded 6 weeks after 45 Gy or with residual palpable disease after the completion of treatment. Chemotherapy was given during radiotherapy: 750 mg/m2 daily fluorouracil as a continuous infusion on days 1 to 5 and 29 to 33, and a single dose of mitomycin 15 mg/m2 admi...
1,146 citations
••
TL;DR: This multicentric study has shown that 3D BT is feasible and safe in routine practice and has improved local control with half the toxicity observed with 2D dosimetry.
318 citations
••
TL;DR: Using CFS as the main end point, this trial did not find an advantage for either ICT or HD radiation boost in LAACC, and the results of the most treatment-intense arm B should prompt the design of further intensification studies.
Abstract: Purpose Concomitant radiochemotherapy (RCT) is the standard for locally advanced anal canal carcinoma (LAACC). Questions regarding the role of induction chemotherapy (ICT) and a higher radiation dose in LAACC are pending. Our trial was designed to determine whether dose escalation of the radiation boost or two cycles of ICT before concomitant RCT lead to an improvement in colostomy-free survival (CFS). Patients and Methods Patients with tumors 40 mm, or 40 mm and N1-3M0 were randomly assigned to one of four treatment arms: (A) two ICT cycles (fluorouracil 800 mg/m 2 /d intravenous [IV] infusion, days 1 through 4 and 29 to 32; and cisplatin 80 mg/m 2 IV, on days 1 and 29), RCT (45 Gy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks, fluorouracil and cisplatin during weeks 1 and 5), and standard-dose boost (SD; 15 Gy); (B) two ICT cycles, RCT, and high-dose boost (HD; 20-25 Gy); (C): RCT and SD boost (reference arm); and (D) RCT and HD boost. Results Two hundred eighty-three of 307 patients achieved full treatment. With a median follow-up period of 50 months, the 5-year CFS rates were 69.6%, 82.4%, 77.1%, and 72.7% in arms A, B, C, and D, respectively. Considering the 2 2 factorial analysis, the 5-year CFS was 76.5% versus 75.0% (P .37) in groups A and B versus C and D, respectively (ICT effect), and 73.7% versus 77.8% in groups A and C versus B and D, respectively (RT-dose effect; P .067).
288 citations
••
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors provide guidelines which can assist medical, radiation, and surgical oncologists in the practical management of this unusual cancer, which is strongly associated with human papilloma virus (HPV) infection.
274 citations
••
TL;DR: The Head and Neck Working Group of the European Brachytherapy Group (GEC-ESTRO) decided to formulate the present consensus recommendations, mainly based on clinical experience accumulated by the members of the working group over several decades and the respective publications.
212 citations
Cited by
More filters
•
2,135 citations
••
University of Alabama at Birmingham1, University of South Florida2, Vanderbilt University3, City of Hope National Medical Center4, Fox Chase Cancer Center5, University Of Tennessee System6, Brigham and Women's Hospital7, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance8, Case Western Reserve University9, Roswell Park Cancer Institute10, Northwestern University11, Harvard University12, University of Nebraska Medical Center13, University of Utah14, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center15
TL;DR: This manuscript focuses on the NCCN Guidelines Panel recommendations for the workup, primary treatment, risk reduction strategies, and surveillance specific to DCIS.
Abstract: Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast represents a heterogeneous group of neoplastic lesions in the breast ducts. The goal for management of DCIS is to prevent the development of invasive breast cancer. This manuscript focuses on the NCCN Guidelines Panel recommendations for the workup, primary treatment, risk reduction strategies, and surveillance specific to DCIS.
1,545 citations
••
TL;DR: Stage 0 rectal cancer disease is associated with excellent long-term results irrespective of treatment strategy and Surgical resection may not lead to improved outcome in this situation and may be associated with high rates of temporary or definitive stoma construction and unnecessary morbidity and mortality rates.
Abstract: Multimodality approach is the preferred treatment strategy for distal rectal cancer, including radical surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy. A significant proportion of patients managed by surgery, performed according to established oncological principles, appear to benefit from chemoradiation (CRT) therapy either pre- or postoperatively in terms of survival and recurrence rates.
Preoperative CRT may be associated with less acute toxicity, greater tumor response/sensitivity, and higher rates of sphincter-saving procedures when compared with postoperative course.1,2 Furthermore, tumor downstaging may lead to complete clinical response (defined as absence of residual primary tumor clinically detectable) or complete pathologic response (defined as absence of viable tumor cells after full pathologic examination of the resected specimen, pT0N0M0). These situations may be observed in 10% to 30% of patients treated by neoadjuvant CRT and may be referred as stage 0 disease.3–8 Surgical resection of the rectum may be associated with significant morbidity and mortality, and in these patients, with significant rates of stoma construction.9 Moreover, surgical resection may not lead to increased overall and disease-free survival in these patients. For this reason, it has been our policy to carefully follow these patients with complete clinical response assessed after 8 weeks of CRT completion by clinical, endoscopic, and radiologic studies without immediate surgery. Patients considered with incomplete clinical response are referred to radical surgery. Surprisingly, up to 7% of these patients may present complete pathologic response (pT0N0M0) without tumor cells during pathologic examination, despite incomplete clinical response characterized by a residual rectal ulcer.8
To determine the benefit of surgical resection in patients with stage 0 rectal cancer treated by preoperative CRT therapy, we compared long-term results of a group of patients with incomplete clinical response followed by radical surgery versus a group of patients with complete clinical response not operated on.
1,497 citations
••
Maastricht University Medical Centre1, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart2, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center3, Taipei Medical University Hospital4, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón5, City of Hope National Medical Center6, Mount Vernon Hospital7, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven8, University of Padua9, Northwestern University10, University of Barcelona11, Bellvitge University Hospital12
TL;DR: Patients with pCR after chemoradiation have better long-term outcome than do those without pCR, and pCR might be indicative of a prognostically favourable biological tumour profile with less propensity for local or distant recurrence and improved survival.
Abstract: Summary Background Locally advanced rectal cancer is usually treated with preoperative chemoradiation. After chemoradiation and surgery, 15–27% of the patients have no residual viable tumour at pathological examination, a pathological complete response (pCR). This study established whether patients with pCR have better long-term outcome than do those without pCR. Methods In PubMed, Medline, and Embase we identified 27 articles, based on 17 different datasets, for long-term outcome of patients with and without pCR. 14 investigators agreed to provide individual patient data. All patients underwent chemoradiation and total mesorectal excision. Primary outcome was 5-year disease-free survival. Kaplan-Meier survival functions were computed and hazard ratios (HRs) calculated, with the Cox proportional hazards model. Subgroup analyses were done to test for effect modification by other predicting factors. Interstudy heterogeneity was assessed for disease-free survival and overall survival with forest plots and the Q test. Findings 484 of 3105 included patients had a pCR. Median follow-up for all patients was 48 months (range 0–277). 5-year crude disease-free survival was 83·3% (95% CI 78·8–87·0) for patients with pCR (61/419 patients had disease recurrence) and 65·6% (63·6–68·0) for those without pCR (747/2263; HR 0·44, 95% CI 0·34–0·57; p Q test and forest plots did not suggest significant interstudy variation. The adjusted HR for pCR for failure was 0·54 (95% CI 0·40–0·73), indicating that patients with pCR had a significantly increased probability of disease-free survival. The adjusted HR for disease-free survival for administration of adjuvant chemotherapy was 0·91 (95% CI 0·73–1·12). The effect of pCR on disease-free survival was not modified by other prognostic factors. Interpretation Patients with pCR after chemoradiation have better long-term outcome than do those without pCR. pCR might be indicative of a prognostically favourable biological tumour profile with less propensity for local or distant recurrence and improved survival. Funding None.
1,459 citations