Showing papers by "Diederick E. Grobbee published in 1991"

Determinants of disease and disability in the elderly: the Rotterdam Elderly Study.

Abstract: In this paper the Rotterdam Elderly Study is presented. The aim of the study is to investigate determinants of disease occurrence and progression in the elderly. In addition to contributing to our understanding of the etiology of geriatric illnesses, the study is expected to lead to specific recommendations for intervention. The study focuses on causally related determinants of major diseases in the elderly. Fields of interest for the Rotterdam Elderly Study are conditions which interfere the most with the quality of life for the elderly. The aims of the Rotterdam Elderly Study are: (1) To investigate, by means of epidemiologic, clinical and basic research, the determinants of diseases in order to assess their etiologic significance. (2) To investigate potentially modifiable determinants in order to be able to develop preventive strategies by providing specific recommendations for intervention studies. The Rotterdam Elderly Study focuses on four primary areas of research: neurogeriatric diseases, cardiovascular diseases, locomotor diseases and ophthalmologic diseases. It is a prospective follow-up study, in which determinants of disease and determinants of progression of disease will be investigated in the total population of 55 years or over of the district of Ommoord in Rotterdam. It is anticipated that about 10,000 people will participate in the study and they will be examined in the period of 1991 to 1995.

Blood pressure in childhood : pooled findings of six European studies

Abstract: In an attempt to study and prevent the development of hypertension, there is a growing interest in measuring blood pressure in children. The aim of this is to detect and monitor those with a relatively high level of blood pressure. Until now, reference values on blood pressure in children are based on data from North-American youngsters. The present study provides percentile charts based on pooled data from studies on blood pressure conducted in six North-West European countries among 28,043 children. These blood pressure centiles are presented as age-, height- and gender-specific. Brief guidelines for blood pressure measurements in childhood and for detection of children with a relatively high blood pressure are included.

Methodology of sodium sensitivity assessment. The example of age and sex.

Abstract: This article addresses the methodology of sodium sensitivity assessment. There have been reports to suggest that a high sodium intake is a cause of elevated blood pressure and trials to indicate that a reduction in sodium intake may reduce blood pressure that is already high; the implications of these findings are discussed. Many studies on sodium sensitivity suffer from what could be called the "normal probability fallacy"; without appropriate control conditions, an intervention such as sodium restriction may incorrectly be assigned to a more pronounced response in a subgroup of the study population. As an example, findings are reviewed of age and sex as determinants of a response of blood pressure to variations in sodium intake. The limited data available suggest that subjects that are older and have higher blood pressure levels seem to benefit more from a reduction in sodium intake. In addition, elderly subjects at a high dietary sodium intake may have a higher risk of developing hypertension. Findings in both nonexperimental and experimental studies tend to support this view. Findings on sex differences are less consistent. A systematic approach to the assessment of factors and mechanisms responsible for sodium sensitivity in some subjects is needed to determine who might benefit most. Until more data are available, there is little basis to discriminate sodium-sensitive from sodium-resistant hypertensive subjects.

Primary prevention in hypertension. Valid conclusions from observational studies.

Abstract: Relatively few observational (i.e., nonexperimental) studies have been conducted to examine the role of antihypertensive drug therapy in the primary prevention of coronary heart disease. To draw valid conclusions from experimental or observational studies, internal validity should be ensured. In particular, similarity of "extraneous" effects, of information, and of prognosis between the treatment groups compared in a particular study is needed. Because allocation of participants to antihypertensive drug therapy in observational studies is nonrandomized by definition, special efforts should be made to achieve comparability of prognosis, that is, to avoid "confounding by indication." Follow-up and case-control studies, the two main types of observational studies, also offer certain advantages over randomized clinical trials, particularly when different classes of drugs are compared. Although few valid observational studies on the efficacy of drug therapy for hypertension in the primary prevention of first coronary events have been published, the available data suggest that beta-blockers might confer greater protection than other drug regimens. However, more evidence is needed to confirm these findings. It is concluded that observational studies could play an increasing role in the assessment of the role of antihypertensive therapy in the primary prevention of coronary heart disease when the inherent potentials and pitfalls of these studies are appreciated.