Dillon Landi

Bio: Dillon Landi is an academic researcher from Towson University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Physical education & Queer. The author has an hindex of 7, co-authored 16 publications receiving 186 citations. Previous affiliations of Dillon Landi include University of Baltimore & University of Auckland.

Models based practices in physical education: A sociocritical reflection

Abstract: In this paper, we reflect on models-based practices in physical education using a sociocritical lens. Drawing links between neoliberal moves in education, and critical approaches to the body and physicality, we take a view that models are useful tools that are worth integrating into physical education, but we are apprehensive to suggest they should redefine the purpose of physical education. In arguing this, we attempt to understand the particular effects of certain models on practice and students. We draw on the theoretical concepts of Deleuze, in particular his notion of ‘striated’ space to analyze SPARK-PE, HOPE, and Sport Education. We assert that some models can be useful tools for thinking about instruction, but models-based-practices are no substitute for a thoughtful and thorough physical education program.

Toward a queer inclusive physical education

Abstract: Background: Physical education has historically been a repressive place for queer persons. Since physical education spaces are predominantly heteronormative, research on sexual identity management has shown lesbian teachers often try to ‘pass’ as straight or distance themselves from their sexualities. There has been no research to date that examines the experiences of queer male physical educators.Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to use Deleuzo-Guattarian theory to reflect on my affective experiences as a queer male physical educator. A secondary goal is to transcend binary theorising that has shaped previous research in the field.Design and Analysis: This paper uses autoethnographic examination to analyse experiences as a queer male physical educator. Data consists of narratives from my first year as a physical educator. These narratives are analysed using Deleuzo-Guattarian theory to map their affective implications.Conclusion: I conclude the paper by reflecting on and recommending several ...

Queer men, affect, and physical education

Abstract: The purpose of this paper was to explore the role of queer men’s desire in physical education. The author used interview data from an ethnography with queer youth to explore the relationship betwee...

LGBTQ Research in physical education: a rising tide?

Abstract: Background: LGBTQ scholarship in physical education has a history tracing back to 1982. Recently, however, there has been a ‘rising tide’ in LGBTQ studies in physical education. Despite this recent...

Difference and Repetition

Abstract: The best ebooks about Difference And Repetition that you can get for free here by download this Difference And Repetition and save to your desktop. This ebooks is under topic such as gilles deleuze difference and repetition difference and repetition mariusj preparing to learn from difference and repetition protevi gilles deleuze difference and repetition difference and repetition: on guy debord's films difference and repetition wrmail difference and repetition uksfp difference and repetition pdf book library deleuzeâ€ÂTMs difference and repetition (phil 615) crn: 27134 gilles deleuzes difference and repetition gilles deleuzes deleuzeà ̄¿¢à ̄Â3⁄4ۈ ̄Â3⁄4ÂTMs difference and repetition by henry somers-hall repetition pdf difference and deleuze wordpress difference, repetition, and the n[on(e)-all]: the repetition and difference: a rhythmanalysis of pedagogic outline of gilles deleuze, différence et répétition from colonization to globalization: difference or repetition and difference: a rhythmanalysis of pedagogic reading on the move geneseo migrant center and national the difference and repetition of gabriel tarde repetition and refrain your new wiki! wikispaces difference and repetition 310 conclusion: the postulate difference and repetition in deleuzeâ€ÂTMs proustian sign and differences in the nonword repetition performance of which are the layers of difference and repetition? gilles deleuzes difference and repetition gilles deleuzes gilles deleuze's 'difference and repetition': a critical difference and repetition deleuze pdf kepbeenpdf difference and repetition pdf kepbeenpdfleswordpress difference and repetition european perspectives a series rhetorical analysis university academic success programs what difference does deleuze's difference make? difference and repetition wikipedia difference and repetition gilles deleuze google books deleuze, gilles | internet encyclopedia of philosophy

Postmodern Subjects, Postmodern BodiesThinking Fragments: Psychoanalysis, Feminism, and Postmodernism in the Contemporary WestYearning: Race, Gender, and Cultural PoliticsGender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity

Abstract: Preface (1999) Preface (1990) 1. Subjects of Sex/Gender/Desire I. 'Women' as the Subject of Feminism II. The Compulsory Order of Sex/Gender/Desire III. Gender: The Circular Ruins of Contemporary Debate IV. Theorizing the Binary, the Unitary and Beyond V. Identity, Sex and the Metaphysics of Substance VI. Language, Power and the Strategies of Displacement 2. Prohibition, Psychoanalysis, and the Production of the Heterosexual Matrix I. Structuralism's Critical Exchange II. Lacan, Riviere, and the Strategies of Masquerade III. Freud and the Melancholia of Gender IV. Gender Complexity and the Limits of Identification V. Reformulating Prohibition as Power 3. Subversive Bodily Acts I. The Body Politics of Julia Kristeva II. Foucault, Herculine, and the Politics of Sexual Discontinuity III. Monique Wittig - Bodily Disintegration and Fictive Sex IV. Bodily Inscriptions, Performative Subversions Conclusion - From Parody to Politics

The Fold: Leibniz and the Baroque

Abstract: I n this fascinating but sometimes baffling book, the reader engages with a series of conditionals like the following: "If [the psychiatrist] Clerimbault manifests a delirium, it is because he discovers the tiny hallucinatory perceptions of ether addicts in the folds of clothing" (p.38). "If Leibniz's principles [of identity and sufficient reason] appear to us as cries, it is because each one signals the presence of a class of beings that are themselves crying and draw attention to themselves by these cries ..... (p. 44). Deleuze's study is concerned with Leibniz and with leibnizianism; with the Baroque considered as a historical period and with the baroque considered as a persistent impulse in architecture, decoration, and in human thinking and system construction. Baroque and baroque are explorations, in his view, of curvilinearity, and Deleuze explores Leibniz's use of mathematical analogies from topology, projective geometry and the calculus. But his attention in the book is mainly fixed on two Leibnizian images. The first image is that of the two-storied house, typically represented in baroque painting by an angelic realm in the upper half of the picture hovering above the human realm. In Leibniz' s writings, this translates into the world of matter (a seething, frothing, turbulent, unconscious mass of tiny beings) and the world of intelligent, self-conscious spirits on the upper level. The second image is that of the fold, which appears in the pleats and draperies of Baroque costume, sculpture, and interior decoration, and which reappears in Leibniz's mind-as-folded curtain, in his enveloped organisms, preformed under folds, and in the continuum, from whose recesses ever more numbers or particles can be pulled out. In clothing, waves, the brain, pleats of all sorts, surface disappears into interior. Deconstruction! But is it philosophy? Yes! Though Deleuze pulls his comparison-objects out of every comer of contemporary French culture, they are never arbitrary, and the book is focused clearly on its subject. Here are three reasons to buy it and read it in addition to its charm: (1) It contains several valuable discussions of traditional problems in new terms: e.g., Leibniz's elusive notion offreedom, which Deleuze tries to explain in terms of the notion of "amplitude"; and the problem of why there are bodies at all-why a "separate" monadology is needed together with a theory of animated matter.