scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Dov Dvir

Bio: Dov Dvir is an academic researcher from Stevens Institute of Technology. The author has contributed to research in topics: Extreme project management & Project stakeholder. The author has an hindex of 2, co-authored 2 publications receiving 640 citations.

Papers
More filters
Book
01 Jan 2007
TL;DR: In this article, an unprecedented study of more than 600 projects in a variety of businesses and organizations around the globe is presented, which provides a new and highly adaptive model for planning and managing projects to achieve superior business results.
Abstract: Projects are the engines that drive innovation from idea to commercialization. In fact, the number of projects in most organizations today is expanding while operations is shrinking. Yet, since many companies still focus on operational excellence and efficiency, most projects fail--largely because conventional project management concepts cannot adapt to a dynamic business environment. Moreover, top managers neglect their company's project activity, and line managers treat all their projects alike--as part of operations. Based on an unprecedented study of more than 600 projects in a variety of businesses and organizations around the globe, "Reinventing Project Management" provides a new and highly adaptive model for planning and managing projects to achieve superior business results.

567 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors study several NASA programs and identify a framework that would work for project managers and teams in the NASA envi... The purpose of this research was to study the NASA program's procedures suggest several distinctions among projects based on product lines and priority levels, which form a base for different approval processes.
Abstract: :One of the most common myths in the discipline of project management is the assumption that all projects are the same and can be managed with the same set of processes and techniques. In reality, however, projects differ and “one size does not fit all.” Based on our previous research, we have learned that adapting the right approach to the right project is critical to project success; yet, very few organizations know how to distinguish among their project efforts. Furthermore, we have also learned that there is no universal framework that works effectively for all organizations. NASA's procedures suggest several distinctions among projects based on product lines and priority levels. These distinctions form a base for different approval processes. The next step will be to help managers actually manage different projects in different ways. The purpose of this research was to study several NASA programs and start identifying a framework that would work for project managers and teams in the NASA envi...

82 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A systematic review of relevant literature is presented and an integrated framework for assessing the complexities of managing projects is synthesised, which comprises five dimensions of complexity – structural, uncertainty, dynamics, pace and socio‐political complexity.
Abstract: Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to contribute to operations management (OM) practice contingency research by describing the complexity of projects. Complexity is recognised as a key independent (contingent) variable that impacts on many subsequent decisions in the practice of managing projects.Design/methodology/approach – This paper presents a systematic review of relevant literature and synthesises an integrated framework for assessing the complexities of managing projects.Findings – This framework comprises five dimensions of complexity – structural, uncertainty, dynamics, pace and socio‐political complexity. These five dimensions present individuals and organisations with choices about how they respond to each type of complexity, in terms of business case, strategic choice, process choice, managerial capacity and competencies.Originality/value – The contribution of this paper is to provide a clarification to the epistemology of complexity, to demonstrate complexity as a lived experience for pro...

452 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present the development and use of a set of metrics for assessing the use of project management practices in an empirical assessment of the relative use of different practices, and the link between use of those practices and project success.

338 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, a systematic literature review merging bibliometric and content analysis was applied toward an understanding of the key topics of project management and sustainability, and a survey of project managers was performed and analyzed through exploratory factor analysis.

295 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present the results of a structured review of the rethinking project management (RPM) literature based on the classification and analysis of 74 contributions and in addition takes a critical look at this brave new world.

288 citations