E D Hall

Bio: E D Hall is an academic researcher from Northeastern University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Methylprednisolone & Lipid peroxidation. The author has an hindex of 10, co-authored 10 publications receiving 951 citations.

Effects of a single large dose of methylprednisolone sodium succinate on experimental posttraumatic spinal cord ischemia Dose-response and time-action analysis

Abstract: ✓ The ability of a single large intravenous dose of methylprednisolone sodium succinate (MPSS: 15, 30, or 60 mg/kg) to modify the evolution of lumbar spinal cord ischemia in cats undergoing a contusion injury of 500 gm-cm is examined. Repeated measurements of spinal cord blood flow (SCBF) in the dorsolateral funiculus were made via the hydrogen clearance technique before and for 4 to 5 hours after injury. The mean preinjury SCBF for all animals was 12.29 ± 0.77 ml/100 gm/min. Following injury, SCBF began to decrease progressively in vehicle-treated animals to a level of 7.71 ml/100 gm/min, a fall of 37.3%. In contrast, cats that received a 30-mg/kg intravenous dose of MPSS at 30 minutes after injury maintained SCBF within normal limits (p < 0.05 at 3 and 4 hours after contusion). A 15-mg/kg MPSS dose was less effective at preventing posttraumatic white matter ischemia, and a 60-mg/kg dose was essentially ineffective. It was determined that the 30-mg/kg MPSS dose was optimal for supporting SCBF when the dr...

Lactate and pyruvate metabolism in injured cat spinal cord before and after a single large intravenous dose of methylprednisolone.

Abstract: The lactate content and the lactate/pyruvate ratio of the acutely traumatized cat spinal cord have been studied and were found to rise rapidly following a 400 gm-cm injury. Lactate levels rose nearly twofold within 5 minutes after injury, peaked at 2 hours after injury, and remained significantly elevated for at least 8 hours compared to an adjacent uninjured segment of traumatized cord. Pyruvate levels, on the other hand, fell acutely in the injured section of cord during the 1st hour after injury then rose slowly over an 8-hour period. The changes in tissue lactate and pyruvate metabolism in the spinal cord following injury are consistent with a marked injury-induced reduction in blood flow. The elevation in lactate and the fall in pyruvate levels observed at 1 hour after injury were completely prevented by the intravenous administration of a single 30-mg/kg dose of methylprednisolone sodium succinate at 30 minutes after injury. Lower or higher doses of methylprednisolone were far less effective. The effects of the 30-mg/kg dose of methylprednisolone on tissue lactate content were associated with high tissue levels of the glucocorticoid and were short-lived, paralleling the accumulation and elimination pattern of steroid from the injured tissue. The results suggest that, in addition to other reported beneficial actions of large intravenous doses (30 mg/kg) of methylprednisolone on the injured cord, the glucocorticoid may also improve blood flow to the injured segment as has been suggested by others. The use of high glucocorticoid doses, early therapy initiation, and rigorous maintenance dosing is discussed.

Current application of “high-dose” steroid therapy for CNS injury: A pharmacological perspective

Abstract: Although administration of glucocorticoid steroids is one of the most widely used therapeutic modalities for the clinical management of acute trauma of the central nervous system (CNS), controversy continues regarding their effectiveness. In essence, two viewpoints concerning their use exist. Some believe that despite their poor clinical record, the steroids nevertheless have a place in the treatment of human CNS trauma. In general, this group of clinical investigators uses the steroids primarily out of tradition, feeling that steroid therapy may be of some benefit. Unfortunately, confusion remains as to what constitutes an appropriate dose or regimen. In this regard, it has been suggested that the steroid dose be increased and the regimen intensified. Others believe that steroids should not be used. They contend that in view of their poor clinical record, it is unlikely that increasing the steroid dose or changing the dosing regimen will improve clinical efficacy, since steroids have already failed at what may be considered huge doses by glucocorticoid standards. Furthermore, it is contended that the side effects associated with large steroid doses reduce the margin of safety so as to make the steroids unsafe. Complicating these arguments is a body of experimental evidence that by and large strongly supports the utility of steroids for the acute treatment of CNS trauma. The intent of this article is to evaluate the current use of steroid therapy for CNS trauma from a purely pharmacological perspective, and to compare the steroids' experimental use with their clinical application.

Guidelines for the Management of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury, Fourth Edition

Abstract: The scope and purpose of this work is 2-fold: to synthesize the available evidence and to translate it into recommendations. This document provides recommendations only when there is evidence to support them. As such, they do not constitute a complete protocol for clinical use. Our intention is that these recommendations be used by others to develop treatment protocols, which necessarily need to incorporate consensus and clinical judgment in areas where current evidence is lacking or insufficient. We think it is important to have evidence-based recommendations to clarify what aspects of practice currently can and cannot be supported by evidence, to encourage use of evidence-based treatments that exist, and to encourage creativity in treatment and research in areas where evidence does not exist. The communities of neurosurgery and neuro-intensive care have been early pioneers and supporters of evidence-based medicine and plan to continue in this endeavor. The complete guideline document, which summarizes and evaluates the literature for each topic, and supplemental appendices (A-I) are available online at https://www.braintrauma.org/coma/guidelines.

A randomized, controlled trial of methylprednisolone or naloxone in the treatment of acute spinal-cord injury. Results of the Second National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study.

Abstract: Studies in animals indicate that methylprednisolone and naloxone are both potentially beneficial in acute spinal-cord injury, but whether any treatment is clinically effective remains uncertain. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of methylprednisolone and naloxone in a multicenter randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in patients with acute spinal-cord injury, 95 percent of whom were treated within 14 hours of injury. Methylprednisolone was given to 162 patients as a bolus of 30 mg per kilogram of body weight, followed by infusion at 5.4 mg per kilogram per hour for 23 hours. Naloxone was given to 154 patients as a bolus of 5.4 mg per kilogram, followed by infusion at 4.0 mg per kilogram per hour for 23 hours. Placebos were given to 171 patients by bolus and infusion. Motor and sensory functions were assessed by systematic neurological examination on admission and six weeks and six months after injury. After six months the patients who were treated with methylprednisolone within eight hours of their injury had significant improvement as compared with those given placebo in motor function (neurologic change scores of 16.0 and 11.2, respectively; P = 0.03) and sensation to pinprick (change scores of 11.4 and 6.6; P = 0.02) and touch (change scores, 8.9 and 4.3; P = 0.03). Benefit from methylprednisolone was seen in patients whose injuries were initially evaluated as neurologically complete, as well as in those believed to have incomplete lesions. The patients treated with naloxone, or with methylprednisolone more than eight hours after their injury, did not differ in their neurologic outcomes from those given placebo. Mortality and major morbidity were similar in all three groups. We conclude that in patients with acute spinal-cord injury, treatment with methylprednisolone in the dose used in this study improves neurologic recovery when the medication is given in the first eight hours. We also conclude that treatment with naloxone in the dose used in this study does not improve neurologic recovery after acute spinal-cord injury.

The Second National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study.

Abstract: In 1990, the Second National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study reported that high-dosage methylprednisolone improves neurologic recovery in spinal-injured humans. The study showed that patients who received the drug within 8 hr after injury improved, whereas those who received the drug later did not. The drug significantly increased recovery even in severely injured patients who were admitted with no motor or sensory function below the lesion, contradicting a long-held dogma that such patients would not recover. Some researchers, however, have questioned the stratification of the patient population, the use of summed neurologic change scores, and the absence of functional assessments. The stratification by injury severity and treatment time was planned a priori and based on objective criteria. Detailed analyses revealed no differences between groups attributable to stratification or randomization. While multivariate analyses of the summed neurologic scores were used, the conclusions were corroborated by other analytical approaches that did not rely on summed scores. For example, treatment with methylprednisolone more than doubled the probability that patients would convert from quadriplegia or paraplegia to quadriparesis or paraparesis, analgesia to hypalgesia, and anesthesia to hypesthesia. The treatment also significantly improved neurologic scores in lumbosacral segments, indicating that beneficial effects were not limited to segments close to the lesion site. The treatment did not significantly affect mortality or morbidity. The study strongly suggests that methylprednisolone has significant beneficial effects in human spinal cord injury, that these effects occur only when the drug is given within 8 hr, and that it helps even in patients with severe spinal cord injuries. These conclusions have important implications for spinal cord injury care and research.

Review of the secondary injury theory of acute spinal cord trauma with emphasis on vascular mechanisms

Abstract: In patients with spinal cord injury, the primary or mechanical trauma seldom causes total transection, even though the functional loss may be complete. In addition, biochemical and pathological changes in the cord may worsen after injury. To explain these phenomena, the concept of the secondary injury has evolved for which numerous pathophysiological mechanisms have been postulated. This paper reviews the concept of secondary injury with special emphasis on vascular mechanisms. Evidence is presented to support the theory of secondary injury and the hypothesis that a key mechanism is posttraumatic ischemia with resultant infarction of the spinal cord. Evidence for the role of vascular mechanisms has been obtained from a variety of models of acute spinal cord injury in several species. Many different angiographic methods have been used for assessing microcirculation of the cord and for measuring spinal cord blood flow after trauma. With these techniques, the major systemic and local vascular effects of acute spinal cord injury have been identified and implicated in the etiology of secondary injury. The systemic effects of acute spinal cord injury include hypotension and reduced cardiac output. The local effects include loss of autoregulation in the injured segment of the spinal cord and a marked reduction of the microcirculation in both gray and white matter, especially in hemorrhagic regions and in adjacent zones. The microcirculatory loss extends for a considerable distance proximal and distal to the site of injury. Many studies have shown a dose-dependent reduction of spinal cord blood flow varying with the severity of injury, and a reduction of spinal cord blood flow which worsens with time after injury. The functional deficits due to acute spinal cord injury have been measured electrophysiologically with techniques such as motor and somatosensory evoked potentials and have been found proportional to the degree of posttraumatic ischemia. The histological effects include early hemorrhagic necrosis leading to major infarction at the injury site. These posttraumatic vascular effects can be treated. Systemic normotension can be restored with volume expansion or vasopressors, and spinal cord blood flow can be improved with dopamine, steroids, nimodipine, or volume expansion. The combination of nimodipine and volume expansion improves posttraumatic spinal cord blood flow and spinal cord function measured by evoked potentials. These results provide strong evidence that posttraumatic ischemia is an important secondary mechanism of injury, and that it can be counteracted.

Epidemiology, demographics, and pathophysiology of acute spinal cord injury.

Abstract: Spinal cord injury occurs through various countries throughout the world with an annual incidence of 15 to 40 cases per million, with the causes of these injuries ranging from motor vehicle accidents and community violence to recreational activities and workplace-related injuries. Survival has improved along with a greater appreciation of patterns of presentation, survival, and complications. Despite much work having been done, the only treatment to date known to ameliorate neurologic dysfunction that occurs at or below the level of neurologic injury has been intravenous methylprednisolone therapy. Much research over the past 30 to 40 years has focused on elucidating the mechanisms of spinal cord injury, with the complex pathophysiologic processes slowly being unraveled. With a greater understanding of both primary and secondary mechanisms of injury, the roles of calcium, free radicals, sodium, excitatory amino acids, vascular mediators, and apoptosis have been elucidated. This review examines the epidemiology, demographics, and pathophysiology of acute spinal cord injury.