scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

E. Morganson

Bio: E. Morganson is an academic researcher from Max Planck Society. The author has contributed to research in topics: Quasar & Dark energy. The author has an hindex of 12, co-authored 16 publications receiving 1876 citations.

Papers
More filters
Posted Content
K. C. Chambers, E. A. Magnier, Nigel Metcalfe, H. Flewelling, M. E. Huber, Christopher Waters, L. Denneau, Peter W. Draper, Daniel J. Farrow, D. P. Finkbeiner, C. Holmberg, J. Koppenhoefer, P. A. Price, A. Rest, Roberto P. Saglia, Edward F. Schlafly, Stephen J. Smartt, W. E. Sweeney, R. J. Wainscoat, W. S. Burgett, S. Chastel, T. Grav, J. N. Heasley, Klaus W. Hodapp, Robert Jedicke, Nick Kaiser, R. P. Kudritzki, G. A. Luppino, Robert H. Lupton, David G. Monet, John Morgan, Peter M. Onaka, Bernie Shiao, Christopher W. Stubbs, John L. Tonry, R. L. White, Eduardo Bañados, Eric F. Bell, Ralf Bender, Edouard J. Bernard, M. Boegner, F. Boffi, M. T. Botticella, Annalisa Calamida, Stefano Casertano, W.-P. Chen, X. Chen, Shaun Cole, Niall R. Deacon, C. Frenk, Alan Fitzsimmons, Suvi Gezari, V. Gibbs, C. Goessl, T. Goggia, R. Gourgue, Bertrand Goldman, Phillip Grant, Eva K. Grebel, Nigel Hambly, G. Hasinger, Alan Heavens, Timothy M. Heckman, Robert Henderson, Th. Henning, M. J. Holman, Ulrich Hopp, Wing-Huen Ip, S. Isani, M. Jackson, C. D. Keyes, Anton M. Koekemoer, Rubina Kotak, D. Le, D. Liska, K. S. Long, John R. Lucey, M. Liu, Nicolas F. Martin, G. Masci, Brian McLean, E. Mindel, P. Misra, E. Morganson, David Murphy, A. Obaika, Gautham Narayan, M. Nieto-Santisteban, Peder Norberg, John A. Peacock, E. A. Pier, Marc Postman, N. Primak, C. Rae, A. Rai, Adam G. Riess, A. Riffeser, H. W. Rix, Siegfried Röser, R. Russel, L. Rutz, Elena Schilbach, A. S. B. Schultz, Daniel Scolnic, Louis Gregory Strolger, Alexander S. Szalay, Stella Seitz, E. Small, K. W. Smith, D. R. Soderblom, P. Taylor, Robert R. Thomson, Andy Taylor, A. R. Thakar, J. Thiel, D. A. Thilker, D. Unger, Yuji Urata, Jeff A. Valenti, J. Wagner, T. Walder, Fabian Walter, S. Watters, S. Werner, W. M. Wood-Vasey, R. F. G. Wyse 
TL;DR: Pan-STARRS1 has carried out a set of distinct synoptic imaging sky surveys including the 3ππ$ Steradian Survey and the Medium Deep Survey in 5 bands as mentioned in this paper.
Abstract: Pan-STARRS1 has carried out a set of distinct synoptic imaging sky surveys including the $3\pi$ Steradian Survey and the Medium Deep Survey in 5 bands ($grizy_{P1}$). The mean 5$\sigma$ point source limiting sensitivities in the stacked 3$\pi$ Steradian Survey in $grizy_{P1}$ are (23.3, 23.2, 23.1, 22.3, 21.4) respectively. The upper bound on the systematic uncertainty in the photometric calibration across the sky is 7-12 millimag depending on the bandpass. The systematic uncertainty of the astrometric calibration using the Gaia frame comes from a comparison of the results with Gaia: the standard deviation of the mean and median residuals ($ \Delta ra, \Delta dec $) are (2.3, 1.7) milliarcsec, and (3.1, 4.8) milliarcsec respectively. The Pan-STARRS system and the design of the PS1 surveys are described and an overview of the resulting image and catalog data products and their basic characteristics are described together with a summary of important results. The images, reduced data products, and derived data products from the Pan-STARRS1 surveys are available to the community from the Mikulski Archive for Space Telescopes (MAST) at STScI.

1,257 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The Dark Energy Survey (DES) is a five-year optical imaging campaign with the goal of understanding the origin of cosmic acceleration as discussed by the authors, which performs a 5000 square degree survey of the southern sky in five optical bands (g,r,i,z,Y) to a depth of ~24th magnitude.
Abstract: The Dark Energy Survey (DES) is a five-year optical imaging campaign with the goal of understanding the origin of cosmic acceleration. DES performs a 5000 square degree survey of the southern sky in five optical bands (g,r,i,z,Y) to a depth of ~24th magnitude. Contemporaneously, DES performs a deep, time-domain survey in four optical bands (g,r,i,z) over 27 square degrees. DES exposures are processed nightly with an evolving data reduction pipeline and evaluated for image quality to determine if they need to be retaken. Difference imaging and transient source detection are also performed in the time domain component nightly. On a bi-annual basis, DES exposures are reprocessed with a refined pipeline and coadded to maximize imaging depth. Here we describe the DES image processing pipeline in support of DES science, as a reference for users of archival DES data, and as a guide for future astronomical surveys.

133 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The discovery of two new dwarf galaxies, Lacerta I/Andromeda XXXI (LacI/And XXXI) and Cassiopeia III/And Andromeda XXXII (CasÂIII/And XII), in stacked Pan-STARRS1 r P1- and i P1band imaging data was reported in this paper.
Abstract: We report the discovery of two new dwarf galaxies, Lacerta I/Andromeda XXXI (Lac I/And XXXI) and Cassiopeia III/Andromeda XXXII (Cas III/And XXXII), in stacked Pan-STARRS1 r P1- and i P1-band imaging data. Both are luminous systems (MV ~ –12) located at projected distances of 20.°3 and 10.°5 from M31. Lac I and Cas III are likely satellites of the Andromeda galaxy with heliocentric distances of and , respectively, and corresponding M31-centric distances of 275 ± 7 kpc and . The brightest of recent Local Group member discoveries, these two new dwarf galaxies owe their late discovery to their large sizes ( arcmin or for Lac I; arcmin or 1456 ± 267 pc for Cas III) and consequently low surface brightness (μ0 ~ 26.0 mag arcsec–2), as well as to the lack of a systematic survey of regions at large radii from M31, close to the Galactic plane. This latter limitation is now alleviated by the 3π Pan-STARRS1 survey, which could lead to the discovery of other distant Andromeda satellite dwarf galaxies.

105 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This paper measured quasar variability using the Panoramic Survey Telescope and Rapid Response System 1 Survey (PanSTARRS1 or PS1) and the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) and established a method of selecting quasars via their variability in 10{sup 4} deg{sup 2} surveys.
Abstract: We measure quasar variability using the Panoramic Survey Telescope and Rapid Response System 1 Survey (Pan-STARRS1 or PS1) and the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) and establish a method of selecting quasars via their variability in 10{sup 4} deg{sup 2} surveys. We use 10{sup 5} spectroscopically confirmed quasars that have been well measured in both PS1 and SDSS and take advantage of the decadal timescales that separate SDSS measurements and PS1 measurements. A power law model fits the data well over the entire time range tested, 0.01-10 yr. Variability in the current PS1-SDSS data set can efficiently distinguish between quasars and nonvarying objects. It improves the purity of a griz quasar color cut from 4.1% to 48% while maintaining 67% completeness. Variability will be very effective at finding quasars in data sets with no u band and in redshift ranges where exclusively photometric selection is not efficient. We show that quasars' rest-frame ensemble variability, measured as a root mean squared in Δ magnitudes, is consistent with V(z, L, t) = A {sub 0}(1 + z){sup 0.37}(L/L {sub 0}){sup –0.16}(t/1 yr){sup 0.246}, where L {sub 0} = 10{sup 46} erg s{sup –1} and A {sub 0} = 0.190, 0.162, 0.147, ormore » 0.141 in the g {sub P1}, r {sub P1}, i {sub P1}, or z {sub P1}filter, respectively. We also fit across all four filters and obtain median variability as a function of z, L, and λ as V(z, L, λ, t) = 0.079(1 + z){sup 0.15}(L/L {sub 0}){sup –0.2}(λ/1000 nm){sup –0.44}(t/1 yr){sup 0.246}.« less

69 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
D. J. Brout, C. Lidman, Troxel, P. Doel, Y.-H. Zhang, S. Serrano, F. J. Castander, Robert C. Nichol, P. Challis, T. M. C. Abbott, E. Swann, O. Lahav, Anais Möller, Basilio X. Santiago, M. J. Childress, C. J. Miller, T. F. Eifler, Juan Estrada, Arturo Avelino, Edward Macaulay, Michael Schubnell, David J. Brooks, David J. James, P. E. Nugent, M. Sako, Daniela Carollo, Jennifer L. Marshall, G. Tarle, Alistair R. Walker, J. K. Hoormann, T. Jeltema, M. March, Elisabeth Krause, M. N. K. Smith, R. C. Thomas, Douglas L. Tucker, Karl Glazebrook, A. K. Romer, G. Gutierrez, Samuel Hinton, Vinu Vikram, A. Clocchiatti, M. E. C. Swanson, Mark Sullivan, V. Scarpine, Per Kragh Andersen, P. Martini, Antonella Palmese, Yen-Chen Pan, Daniel Scolnic, E. Kasai, A. Carnero Rosell, Juan Garcia-Bellido, M. A. G. Maia, Daniel Gruen, S. E. Kuhlmann, A. Roodman, Ryan J. Foley, Matt J. Jarvis, Josh Frieman, Geraint F. Lewis, Darren L. DePoy, E. Bertin, K. Kuehn, J. Calcino, Vivian Miranda, Enrique J. Fernández, Gary Bernstein, Richard Kessler, W. G. Hartley, E. Morganson, C. L. Davis, Marcelle Soares-Santos, H. T. Diehl, R. L. C. Ogando, E. Suchyta, Daniel B. Thomas, I. Sevilla-Noarbe, R. R. Gupta, Felipe Menanteau, Daniel Muthukrishna, Keith Bechtol, Alexei V. Filippenko, R. C. Smith, Jacobo Asorey, E. J. Sanchez, J. Lasker, S. A. Uddin, Salcedo Romero de Ávila, Flavia Sobreira, Bruce A. Bassett, A. A. Plazas, B. Flaugher, D. L. Burke, P. Fosalba, Bonnie Zhang, Tianjun Li, J. P. Marriner, Lluís Galbany, Ben Hoyle, D. L. Hollowood, N. E. Sommer, C. B. D'Andrea, Tamara M. Davis, K. Honscheid, S. Desai, Alex Drlica-Wagner, A. G. Kim, R. P. Kirshner, Robert A. Gruendl, Ramon Miquel, B. E. Tucker, J. Annis, S. Allam, R. G. Sharp, Marcos Lima, L. N. da Costa, Kaisey S. Mandel, Carlos E. Cunha, W. C. Wester, E. S. Rykoff, Peter Brown, M. Carrasco Kind, J. De Vicente, J. Carretero 
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present the analysis underpinning the measurement of cosmological parameters from 207 spectroscopically classified type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) from the first three years of the DES-SN, spanning a redshift range of 0.017 <$z$<0.849.
Abstract: We present the analysis underpinning the measurement of cosmological parameters from 207 spectroscopically classified type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) from the first three years of the Dark Energy Survey Supernova Program (DES-SN), spanning a redshift range of 0.017<$z$<0.849. We combine the DES-SN sample with an external sample of 122 low-redshift ($z$<0.1) SNe Ia, resulting in a "DES-SN3YR" sample of 329 SNe Ia. Our cosmological analyses are blinded: after combining our DES-SN3YR distances with constraints from the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB; Planck Collaboration 2016), our uncertainties in the measurement of the dark energy equation-of-state parameter, $w$, are .042 (stat) and .059 (stat+syst) at 68% confidence. We provide a detailed systematic uncertainty budget, which has nearly equal contributions from photometric calibration, astrophysical bias corrections, and instrumental bias corrections. We also include several new sources of systematic uncertainty. While our sample is <1/3 the size of the Pantheon sample, our constraints on $w$ are only larger by 1.4$\times$, showing the impact of the DES SN Ia light curve quality. We find that the traditional stretch and color standardization parameters of the DES SNe Ia are in agreement with earlier SN Ia samples such as Pan-STARRS1 and the Supernova Legacy Survey. However, we find smaller intrinsic scatter about the Hubble diagram (0.077 mag). Interestingly, we find no evidence for a Hubble residual step ( 0.007 $\pm$ 0.018 mag) as a function of host galaxy mass for the DES subset, in 2.4$\sigma$ tension with previous measurements. We also present novel validation methods of our sample using simulated SNe Ia inserted in DECam images and using large catalog-level simulations to test for biases in our analysis pipelines.

65 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The second Gaia data release, Gaia DR2 as mentioned in this paper, is a major advance with respect to Gaia DR1 in terms of completeness, performance, and richness of the data products.
Abstract: Context. We present the second Gaia data release, Gaia DR2, consisting of astrometry, photometry, radial velocities, and information on astrophysical parameters and variability, for sources brighter than magnitude 21. In addition epoch astrometry and photometry are provided for a modest sample of minor planets in the solar system. Aims: A summary of the contents of Gaia DR2 is presented, accompanied by a discussion on the differences with respect to Gaia DR1 and an overview of the main limitations which are still present in the survey. Recommendations are made on the responsible use of Gaia DR2 results. Methods: The raw data collected with the Gaia instruments during the first 22 months of the mission have been processed by the Gaia Data Processing and Analysis Consortium (DPAC) and turned into this second data release, which represents a major advance with respect to Gaia DR1 in terms of completeness, performance, and richness of the data products. Results: Gaia DR2 contains celestial positions and the apparent brightness in G for approximately 1.7 billion sources. For 1.3 billion of those sources, parallaxes and proper motions are in addition available. The sample of sources for which variability information is provided is expanded to 0.5 million stars. This data release contains four new elements: broad-band colour information in the form of the apparent brightness in the GBP (330-680 nm) and GRP (630-1050 nm) bands is available for 1.4 billion sources; median radial velocities for some 7 million sources are presented; for between 77 and 161 million sources estimates are provided of the stellar effective temperature, extinction, reddening, and radius and luminosity; and for a pre-selected list of 14 000 minor planets in the solar system epoch astrometry and photometry are presented. Finally, Gaia DR2 also represents a new materialisation of the celestial reference frame in the optical, the Gaia-CRF2, which is the first optical reference frame based solely on extragalactic sources. There are notable changes in the photometric system and the catalogue source list with respect to Gaia DR1, and we stress the need to consider the two data releases as independent. Conclusions: Gaia DR2 represents a major achievement for the Gaia mission, delivering on the long standing promise to provide parallaxes and proper motions for over 1 billion stars, and representing a first step in the availability of complementary radial velocity and source astrophysical information for a sample of stars in the Gaia survey which covers a very substantial fraction of the volume of our galaxy.

8,308 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, a binary neutron star coalescence candidate (later designated GW170817) with merger time 12:41:04 UTC was observed through gravitational waves by the Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo detectors.
Abstract: On 2017 August 17 a binary neutron star coalescence candidate (later designated GW170817) with merger time 12:41:04 UTC was observed through gravitational waves by the Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo detectors. The Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor independently detected a gamma-ray burst (GRB 170817A) with a time delay of $\sim$1.7 s with respect to the merger time. From the gravitational-wave signal, the source was initially localized to a sky region of 31 deg$^2$ at a luminosity distance of $40^{+8}_{-8}$ Mpc and with component masses consistent with neutron stars. The component masses were later measured to be in the range 0.86 to 2.26 Msun. An extensive observing campaign was launched across the electromagnetic spectrum leading to the discovery of a bright optical transient (SSS17a, now with the IAU identification of AT 2017gfo) in NGC 4993 (at $\sim$40 Mpc) less than 11 hours after the merger by the One-Meter, Two Hemisphere (1M2H) team using the 1 m Swope Telescope. The optical transient was independently detected by multiple teams within an hour. Subsequent observations targeted the object and its environment. Early ultraviolet observations revealed a blue transient that faded within 48 hours. Optical and infrared observations showed a redward evolution over $\sim$10 days. Following early non-detections, X-ray and radio emission were discovered at the transient's position $\sim$9 and $\sim$16 days, respectively, after the merger. Both the X-ray and radio emission likely arise from a physical process that is distinct from the one that generates the UV/optical/near-infrared emission. No ultra-high-energy gamma-rays and no neutrino candidates consistent with the source were found in follow-up searches. (Abridged)

3,180 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the cosmological results from a combined analysis of galaxy clustering and weak gravitational lensing, using 1321 deg2 of griz imaging data from the first year of the Dark Energy Survey (DES Y1), were presented.
Abstract: We present cosmological results from a combined analysis of galaxy clustering and weak gravitational lensing, using 1321 deg2 of griz imaging data from the first year of the Dark Energy Survey (DES Y1). We combine three two-point functions: (i) the cosmic shear correlation function of 26 million source galaxies in four redshift bins, (ii) the galaxy angular autocorrelation function of 650,000 luminous red galaxies in five redshift bins, and (iii) the galaxy-shear cross-correlation of luminous red galaxy positions and source galaxy shears. To demonstrate the robustness of these results, we use independent pairs of galaxy shape, photometric-redshift estimation and validation, and likelihood analysis pipelines. To prevent confirmation bias, the bulk of the analysis was carried out while "blind" to the true results; we describe an extensive suite of systematics checks performed and passed during this blinded phase. The data are modeled in flat ΛCDM and wCDM cosmologies, marginalizing over 20 nuisance parameters, varying 6 (for ΛCDM) or 7 (for wCDM) cosmological parameters including the neutrino mass density and including the 457×457 element analytic covariance matrix. We find consistent cosmological results from these three two-point functions and from their combination obtain S8≡σ8(Ωm/0.3)0.5=0.773-0.020+0.026 and Ωm=0.267-0.017+0.030 for ΛCDM; for wCDM, we find S8=0.782-0.024+0.036, Ωm=0.284-0.030+0.033, and w=-0.82-0.20+0.21 at 68% C.L. The precision of these DES Y1 constraints rivals that from the Planck cosmic microwave background measurements, allowing a comparison of structure in the very early and late Universe on equal terms. Although the DES Y1 best-fit values for S8 and Ωm are lower than the central values from Planck for both ΛCDM and wCDM, the Bayes factor indicates that the DES Y1 and Planck data sets are consistent with each other in the context of ΛCDM. Combining DES Y1 with Planck, baryonic acoustic oscillation measurements from SDSS, 6dF, and BOSS and type Ia supernovae from the Joint Lightcurve Analysis data set, we derive very tight constraints on cosmological parameters: S8=0.802±0.012 and Ωm=0.298±0.007 in ΛCDM and w=-1.00-0.04+0.05 in wCDM. Upcoming Dark Energy Survey analyses will provide more stringent tests of the ΛCDM model and extensions such as a time-varying equation of state of dark energy or modified gravity.

1,201 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present optical light curves, redshifts, and classifications for 365 spectroscopically confirmed Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) discovered by the Pan-STARRS1 (PS1) Medium Deep Survey.
Abstract: We present optical light curves, redshifts, and classifications for 365 spectroscopically confirmed Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) discovered by the Pan-STARRS1 (PS1) Medium Deep Survey. We detail improvements to the PS1 SN photometry, astrometry and calibration that reduce the systematic uncertainties in the PS1 SN Ia distances. We combine the subset of 279 PS1 SN Ia ($0.03 < z < 0.68$) with useful distance estimates of SN Ia from SDSS, SNLS, various low-z and HST samples to form the largest combined sample of SN Ia consisting of a total of 1048 SN Ia ranging from $0.01 < z < 2.3$, which we call the `Pantheon Sample'. When combining Planck 2015 CMB measurements with the Pantheon SN sample, we find $\Omega_m=0.307\pm0.012$ and $w = -1.026\pm0.041$ for the wCDM model. When the SN and CMB constraints are combined with constraints from BAO and local H0 measurements, the analysis yields the most precise measurement of dark energy to date: $w0 = -1.007\pm 0.089$ and $wa = -0.222 \pm0.407$ for the w0waCDM model. Tension with a cosmological constant previously seen in an analysis of PS1 and low-z SNe has diminished after an increase of $2\times$ in the statistics of the PS1 sample, improved calibration and photometry, and stricter light-curve quality cuts. We find the systematic uncertainties in our measurements of dark energy are almost as large as the statistical uncertainties, primarily due to limitations of modeling the low-redshift sample. This must be addressed for future progress in using SN Ia to measure dark energy.

1,084 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Eric C. Bellm1, Shrinivas R. Kulkarni2, Matthew J. Graham2, Richard Dekany2, Roger M. H. Smith2, Reed Riddle2, Frank J. Masci2, George Helou2, Thomas A. Prince2, Scott M. Adams2, Cristina Barbarino3, Tom A. Barlow2, James Bauer4, Ron Beck2, Justin Belicki2, Rahul Biswas3, Nadejda Blagorodnova2, Dennis Bodewits4, Bryce Bolin1, V. Brinnel5, Tim Brooke2, Brian D. Bue2, Mattia Bulla3, Rick Burruss2, S. Bradley Cenko6, S. Bradley Cenko4, Chan-Kao Chang7, Andrew J. Connolly1, Michael W. Coughlin2, John Cromer2, Virginia Cunningham4, Kaushik De2, Alex Delacroix2, Vandana Desai2, Dmitry A. Duev2, Gwendolyn Eadie1, Tony L. Farnham4, Michael Feeney2, Ulrich Feindt3, David Flynn2, Anna Franckowiak, Sara Frederick4, Christoffer Fremling2, Avishay Gal-Yam8, Suvi Gezari4, Matteo Giomi5, Daniel A. Goldstein2, V. Zach Golkhou1, Ariel Goobar3, Steven Groom2, Eugean Hacopians2, David Hale2, John Henning2, Anna Y. Q. Ho2, David Hover2, Justin Howell2, Tiara Hung4, Daniela Huppenkothen1, David Imel2, Wing-Huen Ip7, Wing-Huen Ip9, Željko Ivezić1, Edward Jackson2, Lynne Jones1, Mario Juric1, Mansi M. Kasliwal2, Shai Kaspi10, Stephen Kaye2, Michael S. P. Kelley4, Marek Kowalski5, Emily Kramer2, Thomas Kupfer2, Thomas Kupfer11, Walter Landry2, Russ R. Laher2, Chien De Lee7, Hsing Wen Lin7, Hsing Wen Lin12, Zhong-Yi Lin7, Ragnhild Lunnan3, Ashish Mahabal2, Peter H. Mao2, Adam A. Miller13, Adam A. Miller14, Serge Monkewitz2, Patrick J. Murphy2, Chow-Choong Ngeow7, Jakob Nordin5, Peter Nugent15, Peter Nugent16, Eran O. Ofek8, Maria T. Patterson1, Bryan E. Penprase17, Michael Porter2, L. Rauch, Umaa Rebbapragada2, Daniel J. Reiley2, Mickael Rigault18, Hector P. Rodriguez2, Jan van Roestel19, Ben Rusholme2, J. V. Santen, Steve Schulze8, David L. Shupe2, Leo Singer4, Leo Singer6, Maayane T. Soumagnac8, Robert Stein, Jason Surace2, Jesper Sollerman3, Paula Szkody1, Francesco Taddia3, Scott Terek2, Angela Van Sistine20, Sjoert van Velzen4, W. Thomas Vestrand21, Richard Walters2, Charlotte Ward4, Quanzhi Ye2, Po-Chieh Yu7, Lin Yan2, Jeffry Zolkower2 
TL;DR: The Zwicky Transient Facility (ZTF) as mentioned in this paper is a new optical time-domain survey that uses the Palomar 48 inch Schmidt telescope, which provides a 47 deg^2 field of view and 8 s readout time, yielding more than an order of magnitude improvement in survey speed relative to its predecessor survey.
Abstract: The Zwicky Transient Facility (ZTF) is a new optical time-domain survey that uses the Palomar 48 inch Schmidt telescope. A custom-built wide-field camera provides a 47 deg^2 field of view and 8 s readout time, yielding more than an order of magnitude improvement in survey speed relative to its predecessor survey, the Palomar Transient Factory. We describe the design and implementation of the camera and observing system. The ZTF data system at the Infrared Processing and Analysis Center provides near-real-time reduction to identify moving and varying objects. We outline the analysis pipelines, data products, and associated archive. Finally, we present on-sky performance analysis and first scientific results from commissioning and the early survey. ZTF's public alert stream will serve as a useful precursor for that of the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope.

1,009 citations