Author
Edward M. Eitzen
Other affiliations: United States Department of the Army, University of Pennsylvania, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences
Bio: Edward M. Eitzen is an academic researcher from United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases. The author has contributed to research in topics: Biological warfare & Poison control. The author has an hindex of 25, co-authored 31 publications receiving 10907 citations. Previous affiliations of Edward M. Eitzen include United States Department of the Army & University of Pennsylvania.
Papers
More filters
••
TL;DR: People potentially exposed to botulinum toxin should be closely observed, and those with signs of botulism require prompt treatment with antitoxin and supportive care that may include assisted ventilation for weeks or months.
Abstract: ObjectiveThe Working Group on Civilian Biodefense has developed consensus-based
recommendations for measures to be taken by medical and public health professionals
if botulinum toxin is used as a biological weapon against a civilian population.ParticipantsThe working group included 23 representatives from academic, government,
and private institutions with expertise in public health, emergency management,
and clinical medicine.EvidenceThe primary authors (S.S.A. and R.S.) searched OLDMEDLINE and MEDLINE
(1960–March 1999) and their professional collections for literature
concerning use of botulinum toxin as a bioweapon. The literature was reviewed,
and opinions were sought from the working group and other experts on diagnosis
and management of botulism. Additional MEDLINE searches were conducted through
April 2000 during the review and revisions of the consensus statement.Consensus ProcessThe first draft of the working group's consensus statement was a synthesis
of information obtained in the formal evidence-gathering process. The working
group convened to review the first draft in May 1999. Working group members
reviewed subsequent drafts and suggested additional revisions. The final statement
incorporates all relevant evidence obtained in the literature search in conjunction
with final consensus recommendations supported by all working group members.ConclusionsAn aerosolized or foodborne botulinum toxin weapon would cause acute
symmetric, descending flaccid paralysis with prominent bulbar palsies such
as diplopia, dysarthria, dysphonia, and dysphagia that would typically present
12 to 72 hours after exposure. Effective response to a deliberate release
of botulinum toxin will depend on timely clinical diagnosis, case reporting,
and epidemiological investigation. Persons potentially exposed to botulinum
toxin should be closely observed, and those with signs of botulism require
prompt treatment with antitoxin and supportive care that may include assisted
ventilation for weeks or months. Treatment with antitoxin should not be delayed
for microbiological testing.
1,659 citations
••
TL;DR: In this paper, the Working Group onCivilian Biodefense has proposed a set of guidelines for the use of bio-medical data for defense against cyber-attacks against the US government.
Abstract: Donald A. Henderson, MD, MPHThomas V. Inglesby, MDJohn G. Bartlett, MDMichael S. Ascher, MDEdward Eitzen, MD, MPHPeter B. Jahrling, PhDJerome Hauer, MPHMarcelle Layton, MDJoseph McDade, PhDMichael T. Osterholm, PhD, MPHTara O’Toole, MD, MPHGerald Parker, PhD, DVMTrish Perl, MD, MScPhilip K. Russell, MDKevin Tonat, PhDfor the Working Group onCivilian Biodefense
1,514 citations
••
TL;DR: The Working Group on Civilian Biodefense has developed consensus-based recommendations for measures to be taken by medical and public health professionals if tularemia is used as a biological weapon against a civilian population.
Abstract: ObjectiveThe Working Group on Civilian Biodefense has developed consensus-based
recommendations for measures to be taken by medical and public health professionals
if tularemia is used as a biological weapon against a civilian population.ParticipantsThe working group included 25 representatives from academic medical
centers, civilian and military governmental agencies, and other public health
and emergency management institutions and agencies.EvidenceMEDLINE databases were searched from January 1966 to October 2000, using
the Medical Subject Headings Francisella tularensis, Pasteurella tularensis, biological weapon, biological terrorism, bioterrorism, biological warfare, and biowarfare. Review of these references led to identification
of relevant materials published prior to 1966. In addition, participants identified
other references and sources.Consensus ProcessThree formal drafts of the statement that synthesized information obtained
in the formal evidence-gathering process were reviewed by members of the working
group. Consensus was achieved on the final draft.ConclusionsA weapon using airborne tularemia would likely result 3 to 5 days later
in an outbreak of acute, undifferentiated febrile illness with incipient pneumonia,
pleuritis, and hilar lymphadenopathy. Specific epidemiological, clinical,
and microbiological findings should lead to early suspicion of intentional
tularemia in an alert health system; laboratory confirmation of agent could
be delayed. Without treatment, the clinical course could progress to respiratory
failure, shock, and death. Prompt treatment with streptomycin, gentamicin,
doxycycline, or ciprofloxacin is recommended. Prophylactic use of doxycycline
or ciprofloxacin may be useful in the early postexposure period.
1,297 citations
••
TL;DR: This revised consensus statement presents new information based on the analysis of the anthrax attacks of 2001, including developments in the investigation of the Anthrax Attacks of 2001; important symptoms, signs, and laboratory studies; new diagnostic clues that may help future recognition of this disease; updated antibiotic therapeutic considerations; and judgments about environmental surveillance and decontamination.
Abstract: ObjectiveTo review and update consensus-based recommendations for medical and
public health professionals following a Bacillus anthracis attack against a civilian population.ParticipantsThe working group included 23 experts from academic medical centers,
research organizations, and governmental, military, public health, and emergency
management institutions and agencies.EvidenceMEDLINE databases were searched from January 1966 to January 2002, using
the Medical Subject Headings anthrax, Bacillus anthracis, biological weapon, biological terrorism, biological warfare, and biowarfare. Reference review identified
work published before 1966. Participants identified unpublished sources.Consensus ProcessThe first draft synthesized the gathered information. Written comments
were incorporated into subsequent drafts. The final statement incorporated
all relevant evidence from the search along with consensus recommendations.ConclusionsSpecific recommendations include diagnosis of anthrax infection, indications
for vaccination, therapy, postexposure prophylaxis, decontamination of the
environment, and suggested research. This revised consensus statement presents
new information based on the analysis of the anthrax attacks of 2001, including
developments in the investigation of the anthrax attacks of 2001; important
symptoms, signs, and laboratory studies; new diagnostic clues that may help
future recognition of this disease; current anthrax vaccine information; updated
antibiotic therapeutic considerations; and judgments about environmental surveillance
and decontamination.
948 citations
••
TL;DR: The final statement incorporates all relevant evidence obtained by the literature search in conjunction with final consensus recommendations supported by all working group members.
Abstract: ObjectiveThe Working Group on Civilian Biodefense has developed consensus-based
recommendations for measures to be taken by medical and public health professionals
following the use of plague as a biological weapon against a civilian population.ParticipantsThe working group included 25 representatives from major academic medical
centers and research, government, military, public health, and emergency management
institutions and agencies.EvidenceMEDLINE databases were searched from January 1966 to June 1998 for the
Medical Subject Headings plague, Yersinia pestis, biological weapon, biological terrorism, biological warfare, and biowarfare. Review of the bibliographies
of the references identified by this search led to subsequent identification
of relevant references published prior to 1966. In addition, participants
identified other unpublished references and sources. Additional MEDLINE searches
were conducted through January 2000.Consensus ProcessThe first draft of the consensus statement was a synthesis of information
obtained in the formal evidence-gathering process. The working group was convened
to review drafts of the document in October 1998 and May 1999. The final statement
incorporates all relevant evidence obtained by the literature search in conjunction
with final consensus recommendations supported by all working group members.ConclusionsAn aerosolized plague weapon could cause fever, cough, chest pain, and
hemoptysis with signs consistent with severe pneumonia 1 to 6 days after exposure.
Rapid evolution of disease would occur in the 2 to 4 days after symptom onset
and would lead to septic shock with high mortality without early treatment.
Early treatment and prophylaxis with streptomycin or gentamicin or the tetracycline
or fluoroquinolone classes of antimicrobials would be advised.
930 citations
Cited by
More filters
••
TL;DR: The ability of hospital ventilation systems to filter Aspergillus and other fungi following a building implosion and the impact of bedside design and furnishing on nosocomial infections are investigated.
2,632 citations
••
TL;DR: This article describes the latest development of a generic approach to detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature, and makes substantial theoretical and methodological contributions to progressive knowledge domain visualization.
Abstract: This article describes the latest development of a generic approach to detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. The work makes substantial theoretical and methodological contributions to progressive knowledge domain visualization. A specialty is conceptualized and visualized as a time-variant duality between two fundamental concepts in information science: research fronts and intellectual bases. A research front is defined as an emergent and transient grouping of concepts and underlying research issues. The intellectual base of a research front is its citation and co-citation footprint in scientific literature—an evolving network of scientific publications cited by research-front concepts. Kleinberg's (2002) burst-detection algorithm is adapted to identify emergent research-front concepts. Freeman's (1979) betweenness centrality metric is used to highlight potential pivotal points of paradigm shift over time. Two complementary visualization views are designed and implemented: cluster views and time-zone views. The contributions of the approach are that (a) the nature of an intellectual base is algorithmically and temporally identified by emergent research-front terms, (b) the value of a co-citation cluster is explicitly interpreted in terms of research-front concepts, and (c) visually prominent and algorithmically detected pivotal points substantially reduce the complexity of a visualized network. The modeling and visualization process is implemented in CiteSpace II, a Java application, and applied to the analysis of two research fields: mass extinction (1981–2004) and terrorism (1990–2003). Prominent trends and pivotal points in visualized networks were verified in collaboration with domain experts, who are the authors of pivotal-point articles. Practical implications of the work are discussed. A number of challenges and opportunities for future studies are identified. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
2,521 citations
••
TL;DR: This study highlights the need to understand more fully the role of Epstein-Barr virus in the development of central giant cell granuloma and its role in the immune system.
Abstract: John G. Bartlett,1 Scott F Dowell,2 Lionel A. Mandell,6 Thomas M. File, Jr.,3 Daniel M. Musher,4 and Michael J. Fine5 'Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, 2Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, 3Northeastern Ohio Universities College of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, 4Baylor College of Medicine and Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, Texas, and 5University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA; and 6McMaster University, Toronto, Canada
2,292 citations
••
Veterans Health Administration1, University of Miami2, San Francisco General Hospital3, University of California, San Francisco4, University of Missouri5, University of California, Los Angeles6, Tufts University7, University of Washington8, University of Minnesota9, Stanford University10, VA Palo Alto Healthcare System11, Palo Alto Medical Foundation12, Medical College of Wisconsin13
TL;DR: It is the recommendation of this committee that patients with soft-tissue infection be distinguished by signs and symptoms of systemic toxicity (e.g., fever or hypothermia, tachycardia [heart rate,] and so on).
Abstract: EXECUTIVE SUMMARYSoft-tissue infections are common, generally of mild tomodest severity, and are easily treated with a variety ofagents. An etiologic diagnosis of simple cellulitis is fre-quently difficult and generally unnecessary for patientswith mild signs and symptoms of illness. Clinical as-sessment of the severity of infection is crucial, and sev-eral classification schemes and algorithms have beenproposed to guide the clinician [1]. However, mostclinical assessments have been developed from eitherretrospective studies or from an author’s own “clinicalexperience,” illustrating the need for prospectivestudieswith defined measurements of severity coupled to man-agement issues and outcomes.Until then, it is the recommendation of this com-mittee that patients with soft-tissue infection accom-panied by signs and symptoms of systemic toxicity (e.g.,fever or hypothermia, tachycardia [heart rate,
2,008 citations
••
TL;DR: This guideline addresses the wide array of SSTIs that occur in this population and emphasizes the importance of clinical skills in promptly diagnosing SSTI, identifying the pathogen, and administering effective treatments in a timely fashion.
Abstract: A panel of national experts was convened by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) to update the 2005 guidelines for the treatment of skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs). The panel's recommendations were developed to be concordant with the recently published IDSA guidelines for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections. The focus of this guideline is the diagnosis and appropriate treatment of diverse SSTIs ranging from minor superficial infections to life-threatening infections such as necrotizing fasciitis. In addition, because of an increasing number of immunocompromised hosts worldwide, the guideline addresses the wide array of SSTIs that occur in this population. These guidelines emphasize the importance of clinical skills in promptly diagnosing SSTIs, identifying the pathogen, and administering effective treatments in a timely fashion.
1,856 citations