Author
Eki J. Setijadi
Other affiliations: Kessler Foundation, fondazione bruno kessler
Bio: Eki J. Setijadi is an academic researcher from University of New South Wales. The author has contributed to research in topics: Hydrogen & Magnesium. The author has an hindex of 9, co-authored 12 publications receiving 471 citations. Previous affiliations of Eki J. Setijadi include Kessler Foundation & fondazione bruno kessler.
Topics: Hydrogen, Magnesium, Hydrogen storage, Catalysis, Hydrogenolysis
Papers
More filters
•
Trinity College, Dublin1, Heidelberg University2, University of Cambridge3, Autonomous University of Madrid4, Université Paris-Saclay5, University of Zaragoza6, Spanish National Research Council7, University of Nottingham8, RWTH Aachen University9, Kessler Foundation10, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia11, University of Grenoble12, Georgia Institute of Technology13, Dresden University of Technology14, Polytechnic University of Turin15, University of Zurich16, Bielefeld University17, University of Strasbourg18, Technical University of Denmark19, Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology20, Ikerbasque21, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg22, Technische Universität München23, Bundeswehr University Munich24, University of Bern25, University of Patras26, Foundation for Research & Technology – Hellas27, Center for Theoretical Studies, University of Miami28, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne29, University of Ulm30, University of Eastern Finland31, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki32, University of Manchester33, Polish Academy of Sciences34, Aalto University35, University of Castilla–La Mancha36, ShanghaiTech University37, University of Exeter38, Chalmers University of Technology39, Warsaw University of Technology40, University of Trieste41, University of Trento42, Queen Mary University of London43, Instituto Politécnico Nacional44, University of the Basque Country45, Chemnitz University of Technology46, Charles University in Prague47, University of Jena48, University of Texas at Dallas49
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present an overview of the main techniques for production and processing of graphene and related materials (GRMs), as well as the key characterization procedures, adopting a 'hands-on' approach, providing practical details and procedures as derived from literature and from the authors' experience, in order to enable the reader to reproduce the results.
Abstract: © 2020 The Author(s). We present an overview of the main techniques for production and processing of graphene and related materials (GRMs), as well as the key characterization procedures. We adopt a 'hands-on' approach, providing practical details and procedures as derived from literature as well as from the authors' experience, in order to enable the reader to reproduce the results. Section I is devoted to 'bottom up' approaches, whereby individual constituents are pieced together into more complex structures. We consider graphene nanoribbons (GNRs) produced either by solution processing or by on-surface synthesis in ultra high vacuum (UHV), as well carbon nanomembranes (CNM). Production of a variety of GNRs with tailored band gaps and edge shapes is now possible. CNMs can be tuned in terms of porosity, crystallinity and electronic behaviour. Section II covers 'top down' techniques. These rely on breaking down of a layered precursor, in the graphene case usually natural crystals like graphite or artificially synthesized materials, such as highly oriented pyrolythic graphite, monolayers or few layers (FL) flakes. The main focus of this section is on various exfoliation techniques in a liquid media, either intercalation or liquid phase exfoliation (LPE). The choice of precursor, exfoliation method, medium as well as the control of parameters such as time or temperature are crucial. A definite choice of parameters and conditions yields a particular material with specific properties that makes it more suitable for a targeted application. We cover protocols for the graphitic precursors to graphene oxide (GO). This is an important material for a range of applications in biomedicine, energy storage, nanocomposites, etc. Hummers' and modified Hummers' methods are used to make GO that subsequently can be reduced to obtain reduced graphene oxide (RGO) with a variety of strategies. GO flakes are also employed to prepare three-dimensional (3d) low density structures, such as sponges, foams, hydro- or aerogels. The assembly of flakes into 3d structures can provide improved mechanical properties. Aerogels with a highly open structure, with interconnected hierarchical pores, can enhance the accessibility to the whole surface area, as relevant for a number of applications, such as energy storage. The main recipes to yield graphite intercalation compounds (GICs) are also discussed. GICs are suitable precursors for covalent functionalization of graphene, but can also be used for the synthesis of uncharged graphene in solution. Degradation of the molecules intercalated in GICs can be triggered by high temperature treatment or microwave irradiation, creating a gas pressure surge in graphite and exfoliation. Electrochemical exfoliation by applying a voltage in an electrolyte to a graphite electrode can be tuned by varying precursors, electrolytes and potential. Graphite electrodes can be either negatively or positively intercalated to obtain GICs that are subsequently exfoliated. We also discuss the materials that can be amenable to exfoliation, by employing a theoretical data-mining approach. The exfoliation of LMs usually results in a heterogeneous dispersion of flakes with different lateral size and thickness. This is a critical bottleneck for applications, and hinders the full exploitation of GRMs produced by solution processing. The establishment of procedures to control the morphological properties of exfoliated GRMs, which also need to be industrially scalable, is one of the key needs. Section III deals with the processing of flakes. (Ultra)centrifugation techniques have thus far been the most investigated to sort GRMs following ultrasonication, shear mixing, ball milling, microfluidization, and wet-jet milling. It allows sorting by size and thickness. Inks formulated from GRM dispersions can be printed using a number of processes, from inkjet to screen printing. Each technique has specific rheological requirements, as well as geometrical constraints. The solvent choice is critical, not only for the GRM stability, but also in terms of optimizing printing on different substrates, such as glass, Si, plastic, paper, etc, all with different surface energies. Chemical modifications of such substrates is also a key step. Sections IV-VII are devoted to the growth of GRMs on various substrates and their processing after growth to place them on the surface of choice for specific applications. The substrate for graphene growth is a key determinant of the nature and quality of the resultant film. The lattice mismatch between graphene and substrate influences the resulting crystallinity. Growth on insulators, such as SiO2, typically results in films with small crystallites, whereas growth on the close-packed surfaces of metals yields highly crystalline films. Section IV outlines the growth of graphene on SiC substrates. This satisfies the requirements for electronic applications, with well-defined graphene-substrate interface, low trapped impurities and no need for transfer. It also allows graphene structures and devices to be measured directly on the growth substrate. The flatness of the substrate results in graphene with minimal strain and ripples on large areas, allowing spectroscopies and surface science to be performed. We also discuss the surface engineering by intercalation of the resulting graphene, its integration with Si-wafers and the production of nanostructures with the desired shape, with no need for patterning. Section V deals with chemical vapour deposition (CVD) onto various transition metals and on insulators. Growth on Ni results in graphitized polycrystalline films. While the thickness of these films can be optimized by controlling the deposition parameters, such as the type of hydrocarbon precursor and temperature, it is difficult to attain single layer graphene (SLG) across large areas, owing to the simultaneous nucleation/growth and solution/precipitation mechanisms. The differing characteristics of polycrystalline Ni films facilitate the growth of graphitic layers at different rates, resulting in regions with differing numbers of graphitic layers. High-quality films can be grown on Cu. Cu is available in a variety of shapes and forms, such as foils, bulks, foams, thin films on other materials and powders, making it attractive for industrial production of large area graphene films. The push to use CVD graphene in applications has also triggered a research line for the direct growth on insulators. The quality of the resulting films is lower than possible to date on metals, but enough, in terms of transmittance and resistivity, for many applications as described in section V. Transfer technologies are the focus of section VI. CVD synthesis of graphene on metals and bottom up molecular approaches require SLG to be transferred to the final target substrates. To have technological impact, the advances in production of high-quality large-area CVD graphene must be commensurate with those on transfer and placement on the final substrates. This is a prerequisite for most applications, such as touch panels, anticorrosion coatings, transparent electrodes and gas sensors etc. New strategies have improved the transferred graphene quality, making CVD graphene a feasible option for CMOS foundries. Methods based on complete etching of the metal substrate in suitable etchants, typically iron chloride, ammonium persulfate, or hydrogen chloride although reliable, are time- and resourceconsuming, with damage to graphene and production of metal and etchant residues. Electrochemical delamination in a low-concentration aqueous solution is an alternative. In this case metallic substrates can be reused. Dry transfer is less detrimental for the SLG quality, enabling a deterministic transfer. There is a large range of layered materials (LMs) beyond graphite. Only few of them have been already exfoliated and fully characterized. Section VII deals with the growth of some of these materials. Amongst them, h-BN, transition metal tri- and di-chalcogenides are of paramount importance. The growth of h-BN is at present considered essential for the development of graphene in (opto) electronic applications, as h-BN is ideal as capping layer or substrate. The interesting optical and electronic properties of TMDs also require the development of scalable methods for their production. Large scale growth using chemical/physical vapour deposition or thermal assisted conversion has been thus far limited to a small set, such as h-BN or some TMDs. Heterostructures could also be directly grown.
330 citations
••
TL;DR: Three-armed biodegradable star polymers made from polystyrene (polySt) and poly (polyethylene glycol) acrylate (polyPEG-A) were synthesized via a "core first" methodology using a trifunctional RAFT agent, created by attaching RAFT agents to a core via their R-groups.
82 citations
••
TL;DR: Magnesium nanoparticles as small as 7 nm have been synthesized by reducing di-n-buytlmagnesium with lithium and individually coated with elements including Co, Fe, Ni, Si, or Ti for further tuning of their thermodynamic and kinetic properties as discussed by the authors.
Abstract: Magnesium nanoparticles as small as 7 nm have been synthesized by reducing di-n-buytlmagnesium with lithium and individually coated with elements including Co, Fe, Ni, Si, or Ti for further tuning of their thermodynamic and kinetic properties. Coating was achieved via a transmetalation process whereby precursors were directly deposited at the surface of the magnesium nanoparticles acting as a reducing agent. Studies of hydrogen storage properties showed that these coated magnesium nanoparticles were capable of absorbing hydrogen at low temperatures <140 °C and partially formed transition metal complex hydrides at temperatures above 350 °C. These complex hydrides, assumed to form a shell around the magnesium core, were found to control hydrogen desorption kinetics to some extent. More remarkably, thermodynamics of nanosize magnesium were significantly altered through this coating process. In particular, upon Ni coating a significant decrease of the plateau pressure occurred while achieving fast kinetics. T...
44 citations
••
TL;DR: In this article, a cholesterol-functional trithiocarbonate reversible addition-fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) agent was synthesized and employed to generate well-defined poly(polyethylene glycol) acrylate with cholesterol chain termini using RAFT polymerization.
Abstract: A cholesterol-functional trithiocarbonate reversible addition–fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) agent was synthesized and employed to generate well-defined poly(polyethylene glycol) acrylate with cholesterol chain termini using RAFT polymerization. Subsequently, the polymers were grafted onto the surface of gold nanoparticles using the trithiocarbonate functionality to bind to the gold surface. The cholesterol moieties were then modified via complexation with β-cyclodextrin. The step-by-step modification of gold nanoparticles was characterized by dynamic light scattering, attenuated total reflection infrared spectroscopy and surface plasmon resonance analysis.
42 citations
••
TL;DR: In particular, hydrogen desorption from the smallest particles of MgH 2 produced via the hydrogenolysis of di-n-butylmagnesium under hydrogen pressure or cyclohexane was impressive as discussed by the authors.
37 citations
Cited by
More filters
•
28,685 citations
•
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors presented a method to detect the presence of a tumor in the human brain using EPFL-206025 data set, which was created on 2015-03-03, modified on 2017-05-12
Abstract: Note: Times Cited: 875 Reference EPFL-ARTICLE-206025doi:10.1021/cr0501846View record in Web of Science URL: ://WOS:000249839900009 Record created on 2015-03-03, modified on 2017-05-12
1,704 citations
•
1,178 citations
••
TL;DR: The control of molecular weight and molecular weight distribution has enabled access to complex architectures and site specific functionality that were previously impossible to achieve via traditional free radical polymerizations.
Abstract: A living radical polymerization (LRP) is a free radical polymerization that aims at displaying living character, (i.e., does not terminate or transfer and is able to continue polymerization once the initial feed is exhausted by addition of more monomer). However, termination reactions are inherent to a radical process, and modern LRP techniques seek to minimize such reactions, therefore providing control over the molecular weight and the molecular weight distribution of a polymeric material. In addition, the better LRP techniques incorporate many of the desirable features of traditional free radical polymerization, such as compatibility with a wide range of monomers, tolerance of many functionalities, and facile reaction conditions. The control of molecular weight and molecular weight distribution has enabled access to complex architectures and site specific functionality that were previously impossible to achieve via traditional free radical polymerizations. These LRPs are classified in three different subgroups: (1) stable free-radical polymerization such as nitroxide mediated polymerization (NMP),1,2 (2) degenerative transfer polymerization, such as iodine transfer polymerization (ITP and RITP),3,4 single electron transfer-degenerative transfer living radical polymerization(SET-DTLRP),5,6reversibleaddition-fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT),7,8 and macromolecular design via the interchange of xanthates (MADIX)9,10 polymerization, and (3) metal mediated catalyzed polymerization, such as atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP),11-14 single electron transfer-living radical polymerization (SET-LRP),15 and organotellurium mediated living radical polymrization16-19 Among the existing LRP techniques, RAFT and MADIX are probably the most versatile processes, as they are tolerant * E-mail: T.P.D., T.Davis@UNSW.edu.au; S.P., S.Perrier@ chem.usyd.edu.au. † Centre for Advanced Macromolecular Design (CAMD), School of Chemical Sciences & Engineering, UNSW. ‡ Centre for Advanced Macromolecular Design (CAMD), School of Biotechnology & Biomolecular Sciences, UNSW. § The University of Sydney. Chem. Rev. 2009, 109, 5402–5436 5402
858 citations