Elodie Laporte

Bio: Elodie Laporte is an academic researcher from Université Paris-Saclay. The author has contributed to research in topics: Certified reference materials & Extraction (chemistry). The author has an hindex of 1, co-authored 4 publications receiving 7 citations.

Intercomparison exercise on difficult to measure radionuclides in activated steel: statistical analysis of radioanalytical results and activation calculations

Abstract: This paper reports the results obtained during an intercomparison exercise for the determination of difficult to measure radionuclides in activated reactor pressure vessel (RPV) steel samples. In total, eight laboratories participated analysing 14C, 55Fe and 63Ni activity concentrations in RPV steel. In addition, some laboratories also analysed 60Co activity concentrations. Corresponding activity concentrations were also determined using activation calculations. Robust statistical techniques were utilised for the analysis of the results according to ISO 13528 standard. The results showed good agreement for 55Fe and 63Ni results whereas 14C results had significant differences. 60Co results were in quite good agreement.

Intercomparison exercise on difficult to measure radionuclides in activated concrete - statistical analysis and comparison with activation calculations

Abstract: This paper reports the results obtained in a Nordic Nuclear Safety Research project during the second intercomparison exercise for the determination of difficult to measure radionuclides in decommissioning waste. Eight laboratories participated by carrying out radiochemical analysis of 3H, 14C, 36Cl, 41Ca, 55Fe and 63Ni in an activated concrete. In addition, gamma emitters, namely 152Eu and 60Co, were analysed. The assigned values were derived from the submitted results according to ISO 13,528 standard and the performance assessments were determined using z scores. The measured results were compared with activation calculation result showing varying degree of comparability.

Accurate measurement of 55 Fe in radioactive waste

Abstract: A radiochemical method was developed for the accurate 55Fe determination in various radioactive waste, in particular samples contaminated with 241Pu. It consisted of three purification steps based on first ammonium hydroxide precipitation, and then anion exchange separation followed by TRU®-based extraction chromatography. It was characterized by an iron recovery yield of about 80% for all the studied samples and a 60Co decontamination factor of 106. In comparison to a standard protocol based on iron cupferrate extraction in chloroform, an improvement of a 30-fold factor was achieved towards plutonium. The developed TRU®-based procedure was validated by participating in interlaboratory exercises.

Are analytical standards and reagents really reliable

Abstract: Quality assurance is one of the major challenges in analytical chemistry, whatever the scope of application. The quality of analytical standards is very seldom questioned; however, sometimes odd results are obtained, and all the other potential sources of discrepancies are eliminated. So, we investigated the reliability of three analytical standards and reagents implemented for radiochemical and chemical characterizations of nuclear waste. In particular, this work examined the purity of a source of tritiated dodecane, the trueness of a certified concentration value and the purity for a diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA) reagent and the trueness of a certified concentration value for a multi-anion standard used in an interlaboratory comparison exercise. It was shown that the source of tritiated dodecane contains 60 % of tritiated impurities. The trueness of the DTPA concentration certified by the supplier was questioned due to the presence of impurities in the solution. It was proven that the long-term stability of the multi-anion standard was not guaranteed for nitrite. The results clearly demonstrated that, despite the certificates delivered by the suppliers, caution has to be taken toward the reliability of the analytical standards and reagents.

Intercomparison exercise on difficult to measure radionuclides in activated concrete - statistical analysis and comparison with activation calculations

Abstract: This paper reports the results obtained in a Nordic Nuclear Safety Research project during the second intercomparison exercise for the determination of difficult to measure radionuclides in decommissioning waste. Eight laboratories participated by carrying out radiochemical analysis of 3H, 14C, 36Cl, 41Ca, 55Fe and 63Ni in an activated concrete. In addition, gamma emitters, namely 152Eu and 60Co, were analysed. The assigned values were derived from the submitted results according to ISO 13,528 standard and the performance assessments were determined using z scores. The measured results were compared with activation calculation result showing varying degree of comparability.

Accurate measurement of 55 Fe in radioactive waste

Abstract: A radiochemical method was developed for the accurate 55Fe determination in various radioactive waste, in particular samples contaminated with 241Pu. It consisted of three purification steps based on first ammonium hydroxide precipitation, and then anion exchange separation followed by TRU®-based extraction chromatography. It was characterized by an iron recovery yield of about 80% for all the studied samples and a 60Co decontamination factor of 106. In comparison to a standard protocol based on iron cupferrate extraction in chloroform, an improvement of a 30-fold factor was achieved towards plutonium. The developed TRU®-based procedure was validated by participating in interlaboratory exercises.

DTM-Decom II - Intercomparison exercise in analysis of DTM in decommissioning waste

Abstract: An intercomparison exercise was carried out for difficult to measure radionuclides in activated reactor pressure vessel steel samples. The results were analysed accorging to ISO 13528 standard. The performance assessment was carried out using z score. Report includes an overview of the radioanalytical procedures, preliminary and final results, and preformance assessments.