Showing papers by "Emilios Christodoulidis published in 2006"
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors propose a method to solve the problem of homonymity of homophily in the context of homomorphic data, and no abstracts are available.
Abstract: No abstract available.
195 citations
Book•
03 Sep 2006TL;DR: In this article, the relationship between law and politics is discussed and a discussion of the role of the law in politics is presented, with a focus on the relation between the legal system and legal reasoning.
Abstract: Part 1: Law and Politics. 1. General Themes: 1.1 Introduction to the Relationship between Law and Politics 1.2 Sovereignty 1.3 The rule of law & the `inner morality of law' 1.4 Rights 1.5 Identifying Valid Law. 2. Advanced Topics: 2.1 Justice 2.2 Constitutionalism and Citizenship 2.3 Law, politics and globalisation 2.4 Law and the state of emergency 2.5 The Rule of law in political transitions. Tutorials. Part 2: Legal Reasoning. 1. General Themes: 1.1 Legal System and legal reasoning 1.2 Legal Formalism 1.3 American Legal Realism 1.4 Open texture' and the limits of judicial discretion 1.5 Law as Interpretative practice 1.6 The politics of legal reasoning. 2. Advanced Topics. 2.1 Natural law and the limits of rule following 2.2 Equality, difference and domination: feminist critiques of adjudication 2.3 Trials, facts and narratives 2.4 Judging in an unjust society 2.5 Law and Deconstruction. Tutorials. Part 3: Law and Modernity. 1. General Themes. 1.1 The Advent of Modernity 1.2 Law and Social Solidarity 1.3 Law, power and exploitation 1.4 Formal legal rationality and legal modernity 1.5 Transformations of Modern law. 2. Advanced Topics. 2.1 Legal pluralism 2.2 Juridification 2.3 Displacing the juridical: Foucault on power and discipline 2.4.Law in the risk society 2.5 Law and Autopoiesis
20 citations
01 Jan 2006
3 citations
01 Jan 2006
TL;DR: The authors argue against the subordination of the political to the legal that, they argue, is advanced under theories or "republican constitutionalism" and undertake a defense of political as "reflexive".
Abstract: In this paper I take issue with and argue against a certain subordination of the political to the legal that, I argue, is advanced under theories or 'republican constitutionalism' and undertake a defense of the political as 'reflexive'. In republican constitutionalism one discerns an 'imperialistic' lega/move to set the terms of political discourse, as political conflicts in order to be legally resolved are forced to meet criteria of legal relevance: in the process much that is vital to political action, its understanding and undertaking, is suppressed, elided or appropriated. I argue against the purported 'containment' of politics in law and for a 'reflexivity' that is constitutive of politics, re-introducing contingency and self-reference ('what is political can only be a political question') at the heart of what it means to act politically.
2 citations