scispace - formally typeset
E

Emmanuel J. Candès

Researcher at Stanford University

Publications -  280
Citations -  148481

Emmanuel J. Candès is an academic researcher from Stanford University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Convex optimization & Compressed sensing. The author has an hindex of 102, co-authored 262 publications receiving 135077 citations. Previous affiliations of Emmanuel J. Candès include Samsung & École Normale Supérieure.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Exact Matrix Completion via Convex Optimization

TL;DR: It is proved that one can perfectly recover most low-rank matrices from what appears to be an incomplete set of entries, and that objects other than signals and images can be perfectly reconstructed from very limited information.
Journal ArticleDOI

Enhancing Sparsity by Reweighted ℓ 1 Minimization

TL;DR: A novel method for sparse signal recovery that in many situations outperforms ℓ1 minimization in the sense that substantially fewer measurements are needed for exact recovery.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Dantzig selector: Statistical estimation when p is much larger than n

TL;DR: In many important statistical applications, the number of variables or parameters p is much larger than the total number of observations n as discussed by the authors, and it is possible to estimate β reliably based on the noisy data y.
Journal ArticleDOI

The restricted isometry property and its implications for compressed sensing

TL;DR: Candes et al. as discussed by the authors established new results about the accuracy of the reconstruction from undersampled measurements, which improved on earlier estimates, and have the advantage of being more elegant. But they did not consider the restricted isometry property of the sensing matrix.
Journal ArticleDOI

Fast Discrete Curvelet Transforms

TL;DR: This paper describes two digital implementations of a new mathematical transform, namely, the second generation curvelet transform in two and three dimensions, based on unequally spaced fast Fourier transforms, while the second is based on the wrapping of specially selected Fourier samples.