Eric M. Leeper

Bio: Eric M. Leeper is an academic researcher from University of Virginia. The author has contributed to research in topics: Monetary policy & Fiscal policy. The author has an hindex of 47, co-authored 174 publications receiving 10899 citations. Previous affiliations of Eric M. Leeper include Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta & Federal Reserve System.

What Does Monetary Policy Do

Abstract: This paper uses a single time frame and data set to present and analyze the results that have emerged from the recent empirical literature on the effects of monetary policy. It uses statistical methods that allow the analysis of larger models than appear previously in this literature. Monetary policy actions are shown to be largely systematic responses to the state of the economy. Consequently, there is more uncertainty about the effects of monetary policy than might be thought on the basis of simple graphical or narrative approaches to assessing the evidence. JEL Classifications: E3, E4, E5  1996 by THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION. This document may be freely reproduced for educational and research purposes provided that i) this copyright notice is included with each copy, ii) no changes are made in the document, and iii) copies are not sold, but retained for individual use or distributed free. 1 Indiana University, Yale University, and Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, respectively. A draft of this paper is available by ftp from ftp://ftp.econ.yale.edu/pub/sims/bpea or by http from http://ezinfo.ucs.indiana.edu/~eleeper/home.htm. The authors would like to acknowledge what they have learned about the implementation of monetary policy from conversations with Lois Berthaume, Will Roberds, and Mary Rosenbaum of the Atlanta Fed, Charles Steindel of the New York Fed, Marvin Goodfriend of the Richmond Fed, and Sheila Tschinkel. David Petersen of the Atlanta Fed helped both in locating data and in discussions of the operation of the money markets.

When Do Long-Run Identifying Restrictions Give Reliable Results?

Abstract: Many recent articles have identified behavioral disturbances in vector autoregressions by imposing restrictions on the long-run effects of shocks. This article demonstrates that this approach will be unreliable unless the underlying economy satisfies three types of strong restrictions. Although many aspects of these issues have been raised before, this article draws out and illustrates the implications for inferences under the long-run scheme. Furthermore, it provides strategies for dealing with the problems.

The Dynamic Impacts of Monetary Policy: An Exercise in Tentative Identification

Abstract: It is currently popular to identify monetary policy shocks with innovations in some measure of reserves or in the federal funds rate. These assumptions about the interest elasticity of the supply of or demand for reserves imply monetary policy shocks that produce dynamic responses of macroeconomic variables that are anomalous relative to traditional monetary analyses. This paper tentatively identifies supply and demand shocks in the markets for reserves and M2 for the 1980s and contrasts them with results for the 1970s. In the later period, identified monetary policy shocks have dynamic impacts that are fully consistent with traditional analyses.

The Financial Accelerator in a Quantitative Business Cycle Framework

Abstract: This paper develops a dynamic general equilibrium model that is intended to help clarify the role of credit market frictions in business fluctuations, from both a qualitative and a quantitative standpoint. The model is a synthesis of the leading approaches in the literature. In particular, the framework exhibits a financial accelerator,' in that endogenous developments in credit markets work to amplify and propagate shocks to the macroeconomy. In addition, we add several features to the model that are designed to enhance the empirical relevance. First, we incorporate money and price stickiness, which allows us to study how credit market frictions may influence the transmission of monetary policy. In addition, we allow for lags in investment which enables the model to generate both hump-shaped output dynamics and a lead-lag relation between asset prices and investment, as is consistent with the data. Finally, we allow for heterogeneity among firms to capture the fact that borrowers have differential access to capital markets. Under reasonable parametrizations of the model, the financial accelerator has a significant influence on business cycle dynamics.

The Science of Monetary Policy: A New Keynesian Perspective

Abstract: This paper reviews the recent literature on monetary policy rules. To organize the discussion, we exposit the monetary policy design problem within a simple baseline theoretical framework. We then consider the implications of adding various real word complications. We concentrate on developing results that are robust across a reasonable variety of competing macroeconomic frameworks. Among other things, we show that the optimal policy implicitly incorporates inflation targeting. We also characterize the gains from making credible commitments to fight inflation and consider the implications of frictions such as imperfect information and model uncertainty. Finally, we assess how proposed simple rules, such as the Taylor rule, square with the principles for optimal policy that we describe. We use this same metric to evaluate the recent course of U.S. monetary policy.

Nominal Rigidities and the Dynamic Effects of a Shock to Monetary Policy

Abstract: We present a model embodying moderate amounts of nominal rigidities that accounts for the observed inertia in inflation and persistence in output. The key features of our model are those that prevent a sharp rise in marginal costs after an expansionary shock to monetary policy. Of these features, the most important are staggered wage contracts that have an average duration of three quarters and variable capital utilization.

The Science of Monetary Policy: A New Keynesian Perspective

Abstract: The paper reviews the recent literature on monetary policy rules. We exposit the monetary policy design problem within a simple baseline theoretical framework. We then consider the implications of adding various real world complications. Among other things, we show that the optimal policy implicitly incorporates inflation targeting. We also characterize the gains from making a credible commitment to fight inflation. In contrast to conventional wisdom, we show that gains from commitment may emerge even if the central bank is not trying to inadvisedly push output above its natural level. We also consider the implications of frictions such as imperfect information.

Monetary Policy Shocks: What Have We Learned and to What End?

Abstract: This paper reviews recent research that grapples with the question: What happens after an exogenous shock to monetary policy? We argue that this question is interesting because it lies at the center of a particular approach to assessing the empirical plausibility of structural economic models that can be used to think about systematic changes in monetary policy institutions and rules. The literature has not yet converged on a particular set of assumptions for identifying the effects of an exogenous shock to monetary policy. Nevertheless, there is considerable agreement about the qualitative effects of a monetary policy shock in the sense that inference is robust across a large subset of the identification schemes that have been considered in the literature. We document the nature of this agreement as it pertains to key economic aggregates.