scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Showing papers by "Erving Goffman published in 1993"


Journal Article
01 Aug 1993
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors explore some of the senses in which the person in our urban secular world is allotted a kind of sacredness that is displayed and confirmed by symbolic acts.
Abstract: of modern society have learned to look for the symbolic meaning of any given social practice and for the contribution of the practice to the integrity and solidarity of the group that employs it. However, in directing their attention away from the individual to the group, these students seem to have neglected a theme that is presented in Durkheim's chapter on the soul (1954: 240-272). There he suggests that the individual's personality can be seen as one apportionment of the collective mana, and that (as he implies in later chapters) the rites performed to representations of the social collectivity will sometimes be performed to the individual himself. In this paper I want to explore some of the senses in which the person in our urban secular world is allotted a kind of sacredness that is displayed and confirmed by symbolic acts. An attempt will be made to build a conceptual scaffold by stretching and twisting some common anthropological terms. This will be used to support two concepts which I think are central to this area, deference and demeanor. Through these reformulations I will try to show that a version of Durkheim's social psychology can be effective in modern dress. Data for the paper are drawn chiefly from a brief observational study of mental patients in a modern research hospital.' I use these data on the assumption that a logical place to learn about personal proprieties is among persons who have been locked up for spectacularly failing to maintain them. Their infractions of propriety occur in the confines of a ward, but the rules broken are quite general ones, leading us outward from the ward to a general study of

711 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Kommunikation-Geschichte as discussed by the authors anstatt Buch-Gedikt et al. as discussed by the authors ) is a collection of sozial-geschichtlich, philosophie-and ideologie-kritisch analyzes of the franzosischen Revolution.
Abstract: Kommunikation-Geschichte anstatt Buch-Geschichte Der zuerst Mornet zu verdankende Versuch, die Ursprunge der franzosischen Revolution, und darin namentlich die Rolle der Aufklarung, besser zu begrei- fen, liess vor mehr als 25 Jahren zwei hauptsachliche Stromungen der Forschung entstehen, die eine sozial-geschichtlich, die andere philosophie- und ideologie-kritisch, die beide zu diesem Thema keine ganz und gar erschopfende Analyse zu liefern vermochten. Die generell in Europa erfolgten sozialen Umwalzungen konnen in der Tat allein das Spezifische der franzosischen Situation nicht hinreichend beschreiben, wahrend die Analysen der Diskurse gewohnlich zu sehr aus dem sozialen Kontext herausheben und die den politischen und philosophischen Reden eigene, starke symbolische Wirksamkeit sich allzusehr verselbstandigen lassen. In diesem Zwischenbereich zwischen Ideen und gesellschaftlicher Realitat sollten in die Forschung die Kommunikationsweisen und insbesondere die spezifischen Wirkungen der Kommunikation durch das Buch miteinbezogen werden, die sich gerade in der prarevolutionaren Periode stark entwickelt hatte und nachhaltigere symbolische Auswirkungen als die einfache orale Kommunikation besitzt.

12 citations