Eszter Kelemen

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present the rationale for the inclusive valuation of nature's contributions to people (NCP) in decision making, as well as broad methodological steps for doing so, and argue that transformative practices aiming at sustainable futures would benefit from embracing such diversity, which require recognizing and addressing power relationships across stakeholder groups that hold different values on human nature-relations and NCP.

TL;DR: In this article, an analytical framework is proposed to make ecosystem services (ES) trade-off research more relevant for spatial planning, which puts stakeholders, their land-use/management choices, their impact on ES and responses at the centre.

TL;DR: In this article, the authors used the experience from 27 case studies which applied different biophysical, socio-cultural and monetary valuation methods to operationalise the ecosystem service concept towards sustainable land, water and urban management.

TL;DR: The transformative capacity of citizen science in particular learning through environmental CS as conservation tool is examined and a template is developed that can be used to explore learning arrangements in CS projects and to explain how the desired outcomes can be achieved through CS learning.

TL;DR: It is found that different valuation methods have different suitabilities to elicit diverse value-types, and guidance is provided for selecting a complementary set of valuation methods in order to develop integrated valuation in practice that includes values of all stakeholders into environmental decision-making.