F. Godefroy

Bio: F. Godefroy is an academic researcher from French Institute of Health and Medical Research. The author has contributed to research in topics: Morphine & Spinal cord. The author has an hindex of 15, co-authored 23 publications receiving 930 citations.

A limited arthritic model for chronic pain studies in the rat

Abstract: Freund's adjuvant induced polyarthritis in rats has been used extensively to study pain processes of long duration. There are limitations of this model for chronic studies of pain/arthritis since the severe systemicchanges provoke ethical concerns and also affect behaviour, physiology and biochemistry. Attempts to limit adjuvant-induced arthritis by plantar injection of the inoculum have been made. In this model, however, the process evolved to produce widespread polyarthritis if followed for the 6-plus-weeks necessary for chronic studies. Therefore, although it offers the researcher a reliable limited model of inflammation and nociception at the outset, for longer studies it may have all the disadvantages of the polyarthritic rat. The purpose of the present study was to produce a limited arthritic process in rats, stable over 6 weeks and suitable for behavioural and neurochemical studies of various chronic pain treatment methods. Injection (0.05 ml) of complete adjuvant containing 300 μg Mycobacterium butyricum in the tibio-tarsal joint produces a predictable monoarthritis, stable clinically and behaviourly from weeks 2 through 6 post injection. As revealed by clinical observations and X-ray examinations, the arthritis produced was limited anatomically, pronounced, prolonged and stable. A marked increase in sensitivity to paw pressure was seen in the affected limb. Animals gained weight and remained active, indicating little systemic disturbance as opposed to polyarthritic rats. We propose this limited model of arthritis as a suitable alternative to the polyarthritic rat for prolonged studies.

Reduction of arthritis and pain behaviour following chronic administration of amitriptyline or imipramine in rats with adjuvant-induced arthritis.

Abstract: Tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) are used extensively to treat chronic pain in man without an adequate explanation for their activity. The purpose of the present study was to investigate this problem by testing the effect of chronic TCAs in an animal pain model: the arthritic rat. Sprague-Dawley rats with adjuvant-induced arthritis were injected daily for 4 weeks with amitriptyline (10 mg/kg) or imipramine (10 mg/kg) or saline, beginning 21 days after the induction of arthritis. Baseline evaluations were made prior to the injection series and at 4 weeks, 24 h after the last injection. Both TCAs significantly reduced 'scratching' and increased 'exploring' behaviour, without changing the response to graded foot pressure. In addition clinical signs of arthritis (ankle circumference, swelling, conjunctivitis, balanitis ...) were significantly reduced, while mobility was increased. This study shows that both amitriptyline and imipramine decrease pain behaviour and arthritis in this chronic pain model. Possible 'antiinflammatory' effects of TCAs and their eventual 'analgesic' effect will be discussed.

The Biopsychosocial Approach to Chronic Pain: Scientific Advances and Future Directions

Abstract: The prevalence and cost of chronic pain is a major physical and mental health care problem in the United States today. As a result, there has been a recent explosion of research on chronic pain, with significant advances in better understanding its etiology, assessment, and treatment. The purpose of the present article is to provide a review of the most noteworthy developments in the field. The biopsychosocial model is now widely accepted as the most heuristic approach to chronic pain. With this model in mind, a review of the basic neuroscience processes of pain (the bio part of biopsychosocial), as well as the psychosocial factors, is presented. This spans research on how psychological and social factors can interact with brain processes to influence health and illness as well as on the development of new technologies, such as brain imaging, that provide new insights into brain-pain mechanisms.

Animal Models of Nociception

Abstract: The study of pain in awake animals raises ethical, philosophical, and technical problems. We review the ethical standards for studying pain in animals and emphasize that there are scientific as well as moral reasons for keeping to them. Philosophically, there is the problem that pain cannot be monitored directly in animals but can only be estimated by examining their responses to nociceptive stimuli; however, such responses do not necessarily mean that there is a concomitant sensation. The types of nociceptive stimuli (electrical, thermal, mechanical, or chemical) that have been used in different pain models are reviewed with the conclusion that none is ideal, although chemical stimuli probably most closely mimic acute clinical pain. The monitored reactions are almost always motor responses ranging from spinal reflexes to complex behaviors. Most have the weakness that they may be associated with, or modulated by, other physiological functions. The main tests are critically reviewed in terms of their sensitivity, specificity, and predictiveness. Weaknesses are highlighted, including 1) that in most tests responses are monitored around a nociceptive threshold, whereas clinical pain is almost always more severe; 2) differences in the fashion whereby responses are evoked from healthy and inflamed tissues; and 3) problems in assessing threshold responses to stimuli, which continue to increase in intensity. It is concluded that although the neural basis of the most used tests is poorly understood, their use will be more profitable if pain is considered within, rather than apart from, the body's homeostatic mechanisms.