scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Filippo Angelini

Other affiliations: University of Perugia
Bio: Filippo Angelini is an academic researcher from University of Turin. The author has contributed to research in topics: Medicine & Cardiology. The author has an hindex of 6, co-authored 36 publications receiving 727 citations. Previous affiliations of Filippo Angelini include University of Perugia.

Papers published on a yearly basis

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: During the Covid-19 outbreak in northern Italy, the daily rate of admissions for acute coronary syndrome at 15 hospitals was significantly lower than in previous outbreaks.
Abstract: Acute Coronary Syndrome during Covid-19 Outbreak During the Covid-19 outbreak in northern Italy, the daily rate of admissions for acute coronary syndrome at 15 hospitals was significantly lower tha...

825 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Mechanisms of cardiac damage and protection after I/R damage are summarized to track the paths through which more appropriate interventional and/or molecular-based targeted therapies should be addressed and insights on novel non-invasive/invasive interventional strategies and on Exo-based therapies as a challenge for improving patient’s long-term complications are provided.
Abstract: Ischemic diseases in an aging population pose a heavy social encumbrance. Moreover, current therapeutic approaches, which aimed to prevent or minimize ischemia-induced damage, are associated with relevant costs for healthcare systems. Early reperfusion by primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) has undoubtedly improved patient’s outcomes; however, the prevention of long-term complications is still an unmet need. To face these hurdles and improve patient’s outcomes, novel pharmacological and interventional approaches, alone or in combination, reducing myocardium oxygen consumption or supplying blood flow via collateral vessels have been proposed. A number of clinical trials are ongoing to validate their efficacy on patient’s outcomes. Alternative options, including stem cell-based therapies, have been evaluated to improve cardiac regeneration and prevent scar formation. However, due to the lack of long-term engraftment, more recently, great attention has been devoted to their paracrine mediators, including exosomes (Exo) and microvesicles (MV). Indeed, Exo and MV are both currently considered to be one of the most promising therapeutic strategies in regenerative medicine. As a matter of fact, MV and Exo that are released from stem cells of different origin have been evaluated for their healing properties in ischemia reperfusion (I/R) settings. Therefore, this review will first summarize mechanisms of cardiac damage and protection after I/R damage to track the paths through which more appropriate interventional and/or molecular-based targeted therapies should be addressed. Moreover, it will provide insights on novel non-invasive/invasive interventional strategies and on Exo-based therapies as a challenge for improving patient’s long-term complications. Finally, approaches for improving Exo healing properties, and topics still unsolved to move towards Exo clinical application will be discussed.

44 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Maurizio Paciaroni1, Giancarlo Agnelli1, Valeria Caso1, Giorgio Silvestrelli, David J. Seiffge2, Stefan T. Engelter2, Gian Marco De Marchis2, Alexandros A Polymeris2, Marialuisa Zedde, Shadi Yaghi3, Patrik Michel, Ashraf Eskandari, Kateryna Antonenko4, Sung Il Sohn5, Manuel Cappellari, Tiziana Tassinari, Rossana Tassi, Luca Masotti, Aristeidis H. Katsanos, Sotirios Giannopoulos, Monica Acciarresi1, Andrea Alberti1, Michele Venti1, Maria Giulia Mosconi1, Maria Cristina Vedovati1, Patrizia Pierini1, Michela Giustozzi1, Enrico Maria Lotti, George Ntaios6, Odysseas Kargiotis, Serena Monaco, Piergiorgio Lochner7, Fabio Bandini, Chrysoula Liantinioti8, Lina Palaiodimou8, Azmil H. Abdul-Rahim9, Kennedy R. Lees9, Michelangelo Mancuso, Leonardo Pantoni10, Silvia Rosa10, Pierluigi Bertora10, Silvia Galliazzo11, Walter Ageno11, Elisabetta Toso12, Filippo Angelini12, Alberto Chiti, Giovanni Orlandi, Licia Denti13, Yuriy Flomin, Simona Marcheselli, Nicola Mumoli, Alexandra Rimoldi, Elena Pinuccia Verrengia, Erika Schirinzi, Massimo Del Sette, Panagiotis Papamichalis, Apostolos Komnos, Nemanja Popovic14, Marija Zarkov14, Alessandro Rocco15, Marina Diomedi15, Elisa Giorli, Alfonso Ciccone, Brian Mac Grory16, Karen L. Furie16, Bruno Bonetti, Valentina Saia, Francesca Guideri, Maurizio Acampa, Giuseppe Martini, Elisa Grifoni, Marina Padroni, Efstathia Karagkiozi6, Kalliopi Perlepe6, Konstantinos Makaritsis6, Marina Mannino, Miriam Maccarrone, Leonardo Ulivi, Nicola Giannini, Elena Ferrari, Alessandro Pezzini17, Boris Doronin, Vera Volodina, Antonio Baldi, Cataldo D'Amore, Dirk Deleu18, Francesco Corea, Jukka Putaala19, Paola Santalucia, Katiuscia Nardi, Angela Risitano20, Danilo Toni20, Georgios Tsivgoulis21, Georgios Tsivgoulis22, Georgios Tsivgoulis8 
01 Aug 2019-Stroke
TL;DR: In patients with AF treated with NOACs who had a cerebrovascular event, mostly but not exclusively of cardioembolic pathogenesis, off-label low dose, atrial enlargement, hyperlipidemia, and high CHA2DS2-VASc score were associated with increased risk of cerebroVascular events.
Abstract: Background and Purpose— Despite treatment with oral anticoagulants, patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) may experience ischemic cerebrovascular events. The aims of this case-control ...

43 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In conclusion, considered its efficacy/safety profile and short procedural time, CB ablation represents the preferable option for first AF ablation procedure.
Abstract: Pulmonary vein isolation is the cornerstone of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Radiofrequency (RF) represents a standard of care for pulmonary vein isolation, whereas cryoballoon (CB) ablation has emerged as a valid alternative. The aim of our meta-analysis was to explore the efficacy and safety of CB compared with RF as first ablation procedure for AF. We searched the literature for studies that investigated this issue. The primary efficacy outcome was AF recurrence. The safety outcomes were: pericardial effusion, cardiac tamponade, phrenic nerve palsy, vascular complications, and major bleedings. Fourteen randomized controlled studies and 34 observational studies were included in the analysis. A total of 7,951 patients underwent CB ablation, whereas 9,641 received RF ablation. Mean follow-up was 14 ± 7 months. Overall, CB reduced the incidence of AF recurrence compared with RF ablation (relative risk [RR] 0.86; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.78 to 0.94; p = 0.001), and this result was consistent across different study design and AF type. CB had a significantly higher rate of phrenic nerve palsy, whereas it was related to a lower incidence of pericardial effusion, cardiac tamponade (RR 0.58; 95% CI 0.38 to 0.88; p = 0.011) and vascular complications (RR 0.61; 95% CI 0.48 to 0.77; p

31 citations


Cited by
More filters
01 Mar 2007
TL;DR: An initiative to develop uniform standards for defining and classifying AKI and to establish a forum for multidisciplinary interaction to improve care for patients with or at risk for AKI is described.
Abstract: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a complex disorder for which currently there is no accepted definition. Having a uniform standard for diagnosing and classifying AKI would enhance our ability to manage these patients. Future clinical and translational research in AKI will require collaborative networks of investigators drawn from various disciplines, dissemination of information via multidisciplinary joint conferences and publications, and improved translation of knowledge from pre-clinical research. We describe an initiative to develop uniform standards for defining and classifying AKI and to establish a forum for multidisciplinary interaction to improve care for patients with or at risk for AKI. Members representing key societies in critical care and nephrology along with additional experts in adult and pediatric AKI participated in a two day conference in Amsterdam, The Netherlands, in September 2005 and were assigned to one of three workgroups. Each group's discussions formed the basis for draft recommendations that were later refined and improved during discussion with the larger group. Dissenting opinions were also noted. The final draft recommendations were circulated to all participants and subsequently agreed upon as the consensus recommendations for this report. Participating societies endorsed the recommendations and agreed to help disseminate the results. The term AKI is proposed to represent the entire spectrum of acute renal failure. Diagnostic criteria for AKI are proposed based on acute alterations in serum creatinine or urine output. A staging system for AKI which reflects quantitative changes in serum creatinine and urine output has been developed. We describe the formation of a multidisciplinary collaborative network focused on AKI. We have proposed uniform standards for diagnosing and classifying AKI which will need to be validated in future studies. The Acute Kidney Injury Network offers a mechanism for proceeding with efforts to improve patient outcomes.

5,467 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The interaction between the viral spike protein and angiotensin-converting enzyme 2, which triggers entry of the virus into host cells, is likely to be involved in the cardiovascular manifestations of COVID-19.
Abstract: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by a strain of coronavirus known as severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has become a global pandemic that has affected the lives of billions of individuals. Extensive studies have revealed that SARS-CoV-2 shares many biological features with SARS-CoV, the zoonotic virus that caused the 2002 outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome, including the system of cell entry, which is triggered by binding of the viral spike protein to angiotensin-converting enzyme 2. Clinical studies have also reported an association between COVID-19 and cardiovascular disease. Pre-existing cardiovascular disease seems to be linked with worse outcomes and increased risk of death in patients with COVID-19, whereas COVID-19 itself can also induce myocardial injury, arrhythmia, acute coronary syndrome and venous thromboembolism. Potential drug-disease interactions affecting patients with COVID-19 and comorbid cardiovascular diseases are also becoming a serious concern. In this Review, we summarize the current understanding of COVID-19 from basic mechanisms to clinical perspectives, focusing on the interaction between COVID-19 and the cardiovascular system. By combining our knowledge of the biological features of the virus with clinical findings, we can improve our understanding of the potential mechanisms underlying COVID-19, paving the way towards the development of preventative and therapeutic solutions.

927 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors investigated the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on admissions of patients with acute coronary syndromes in England and evaluated whether in-hospital management of patients has been affected.

470 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A systematic and comprehensive evaluation of both clinical and preclinical evidence supporting the hypothesis that the endothelium is a key target organ in COVID-19 is reported, providing a mechanistic rationale behind its systemic manifestations.
Abstract: The symptoms most commonly reported by patients affected by coronavirus disease (COVID-19) include cough, fever, and shortness of breath. However, other major events usually observed in COVID-19 patients (e.g., high blood pressure, arterial and venous thromboembolism, kidney disease, neurologic disorders, and diabetes mellitus) indicate that the virus is targeting the endothelium, one of the largest organs in the human body. Herein, we report a systematic and comprehensive evaluation of both clinical and preclinical evidence supporting the hypothesis that the endothelium is a key target organ in COVID-19, providing a mechanistic rationale behind its systemic manifestations.

384 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This cross-sectional study examines trends in emergency department visits and visits that led to hospitalizations during a 4-month period leading up to and during the COVID-19 outbreak in the US.
Abstract: Importance As coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) spread throughout the US in the early months of 2020, acute care delivery changed to accommodate an influx of patients with a highly contagious infection about which little was known. Objective To examine trends in emergency department (ED) visits and visits that led to hospitalizations covering a 4-month period leading up to and during the COVID-19 outbreak in the US. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective, observational, cross-sectional study of 24 EDs in 5 large health care systems in Colorado (n = 4), Connecticut (n = 5), Massachusetts (n = 5), New York (n = 5), and North Carolina (n = 5) examined daily ED visit and hospital admission rates from January 1 to April 30, 2020, in relation to national and the 5 states’ COVID-19 case counts. Exposures Time (day) as a continuous variable. Main Outcomes and Measures Daily counts of ED visits, hospital admissions, and COVID-19 cases. Results A total of 24 EDs were studied. The annual ED volume before the COVID-19 pandemic ranged from 13 000 to 115 000 visits per year; the decrease in ED visits ranged from 41.5% in Colorado to 63.5% in New York. The weeks with the most rapid rates of decrease in visits were in March 2020, which corresponded with national public health messaging about COVID-19. Hospital admission rates from the ED were stable until new COVID-19 case rates began to increase locally; the largest relative increase in admission rates was 149.0% in New York, followed by 51.7% in Massachusetts, 36.2% in Connecticut, 29.4% in Colorado, and 22.0% in North Carolina. Conclusions and Relevance From January through April 2020, as the COVID-19 pandemic intensified in the US, temporal associations were observed with a decrease in ED visits and an increase in hospital admission rates in 5 health care systems in 5 states. These findings suggest that practitioners and public health officials should emphasize the importance of visiting the ED during the COVID-19 pandemic for serious symptoms, illnesses, and injuries that cannot be managed in other settings.

366 citations