scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Florian Hahn

Bio: Florian Hahn is an academic researcher from Bielefeld University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Gesture & Gesture recognition. The author has an hindex of 5, co-authored 15 publications receiving 208 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A systematically annotated speech and gesture corpus consisting of 25 route-and-landmark-description dialogues, the Bielefeld Speech and Gesture Alignment corpus (SaGA), collected in experimental face-to-face settings is discussed.
Abstract: Communicating face-to-face, interlocutors frequently produce multimodal meaning packages consisting of speech and accompanying gestures. We discuss a systematically annotated speech and gesture corpus consisting of 25 route-and-landmark-description dialogues, the Bielefeld Speech and Gesture Alignment corpus (SaGA), collected in experimental face-to-face settings. We first describe the primary and secondary data of the corpus and its reliability assessment. Then we go into some of the projects carried out using SaGA demonstrating the wide range of its usability: on the empirical side, there is work on gesture typology, individual and contextual parameters influencing gesture production and gestures’ functions for dialogue structure. Speech-gesture interfaces have been established extending unification-based grammars. In addition, the development of a computational model of speech-gesture alignment and its implementation constitutes a research line we focus on.

70 citations

01 Jan 2011
TL;DR: The authors report about gestures supporting dialogue structure and interaction in the Bielefeld Speech and Gesture Alignment corpus and provide a first classification of them based on Hahn and Rieser (2009-11).
Abstract: We report about gestures supporting dialogue structure and interaction in the Bielefeld Speech and Gesture Alignment corpus and provide a first classification of them based on Hahn and Rieser (2009-11). Numbers will be given on the poster.

60 citations

01 Jan 2010
TL;DR: The authors presented a corpus built of speech and gesture data gained in a controlled study, which was used for speech and hand gesture alignment in the research domain of multimodal speech and gestures alignment.
Abstract: People communicate multimodally. Most prominently, they co-produce speech and gesture. How do they do that? Studying the interplay of both modalities has to be informed by empirically observed communication behavior. We present a corpus built of speech and gesture data gained in a controlled study. We describe 1) the setting underlying the data; 2) annotation of the data; 3) reliability evalution methods and results; and 4) applications of the corpus in the research domain of speech and gesture alignment.

58 citations

01 Jan 2010
TL;DR: How a gesture typology can be extracted form the Bielefeld Speech-And-GestureAlignment corpus (SAGA) making use of the annotated gesture morphology in the SAGA data is discussed.
Abstract: The paper discusses how a gesture typology can be extracted form the Bielefeld Speech-And-GestureAlignment corpus (SAGA) making use of the annotated gesture morphology in the SAGA data. The SAGA corpus is briefly characterized. Using a portion of a MM dialogue, the interface between speech and gesture is shown focussing on the impact of gestures on lexical definitions. The interface demonstrates the need for working out types of gestures and specifying their semantics via a partial ontology. This is started setting up a “typological grid” for 400 gestures. It yields a hierarchy of n-dimensional single gestures and composites of them. A statistical analysis of the grid results is provided and evaluated with respect to the whole SAGA corpus. Finally, it is shown how the typological results are used in the specification of the speech-gesture interfaces for the MM dialogue.

10 citations

Proceedings Article
01 Aug 2013
TL;DR: This work presents a data-driven approach that covers parts of the semantic reconstruction by making use of motion capturing (mocap) technology and provides grounds for a detailed description of how to get at the semantic concept of circularity observed in the data.
Abstract: A fundamental problem in manual based gesture semantics reconstruction is the specification of preferred semantic concepts for gesture trajectories. This issue is complicated by problems human raters have annotating fast-paced three dimensional trajectories. Based on a detailed example of a gesticulated circular trajectory, we present a data-driven approach that covers parts of the semantic reconstruction by making use of motion capturing (mocap) technology. In our FA 3 ME framework we use a complex event processing approach to analyse and annotate multi-modal events. This framework provides grounds for a detailed description of how to get at the semantic concept of circularity observed in the data.

7 citations


Cited by
More filters
01 Jan 2014
TL;DR: Using Language部分的�’学模式既不落俗套,又能真正体现新课程标准所倡导的�'学理念,正是年努力探索的问题.
Abstract: 人教版高中英语新课程教材中,语言运用(Using Language)是每个单元必不可少的部分,提供了围绕单元中心话题的听、说、读、写的综合性练习,是单元中心话题的延续和升华.如何设计Using Language部分的教学,使自己的教学模式既不落俗套,又能真正体现新课程标准所倡导的教学理念,正是广大一线英语教师一直努力探索的问题.

2,071 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: McNeill as discussed by the authors discusses what Gestures reveal about Thought in Hand and Mind: What Gestures Reveal about Thought. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1992. 416 pp.
Abstract: Hand and Mind: What Gestures Reveal about Thought. David McNeill. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1992. 416 pp.

988 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The current understanding of manual and head gesture form and function, of the principle functional interactions between gesture and speech aiding communication, transporting meaning and producing speech, and of research on temporal speech-gesture synchrony are provided.

301 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The Subject of Semiotics References Index of authors Index of subjects
Abstract: Foreword Note on graphic conventions 0. Introduction-Toward a Logic of Culture 0.1. Design for a semiotic theory 0.2. 'Semiotics': field or discipline? 0.3. Communication and/or signification 0.4. Political boundaries: the field 0.5. Natural boundaries: two definitions of semiotics 0.6. Natural boundaries: inference and signification 0.7. Natural boundaries the lower threshold 0.8. Natural boundaries: the upper threshold 0.9. Epistemological boundaries 1. Signification and Communication 1.1. An elementary communicational model 1.2. Systems and codes 1.3. The s-code as structure 1.4. Information, communication, signification 2. Theory of Codes 2.1. The sign-function 2.2. Expression and content 2.3. Denotation and connotation 2.4. Message and text 2.5 Content and referent 2.6. Meaning as cultural unit 2.7. The interpretant 2.8. The semantic system 2.9. The semantic markers and the sememe 2.10. The KF model 2.11. A revised semantic model 2.12. The model \"Q\" 2.13. The format of the semantic space 2.14. Overcoding and undercoding 2.15. The interplay of codes and the message as an open form 3. Theory of Sign Production 3.1. A general survey 3.2. Semiotic and factual statements 3.3. Mentioning 3.4 The prolem of a typology of signs 3.5. Critique of iconism 3.6. A typology of modes of production 3.7. The aesthetic text as invention 3.8. The rhetorical labor 3.9. Ideological code switching 4. The Subject of Semiotics References Index of authors Index of subjects

181 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The D64 corpus as mentioned in this paper is a multimodal corpus recorded over two successive days and contains annotations on conversational involvement, speech activity and pauses as well as information of the average degree of change in the movement of participants.
Abstract: In recent years there has been a substantial debate about the need for increasingly spontaneous, conversational corpora of spoken interaction that are not controlled or task directed. In parallel the need has arisen for the recording of multi-modal corpora which are not restricted to the audio domain alone. With a corpus that would fulfill both needs, it would be possible to investigate the natural coupling, not only in turn-taking and voice, but also in the movement of participants. In the following paper we describe the design and recording of such a corpus and we provide some illustrative examples of how such a corpus might be exploited in the study of dynamic interaction. The D64 corpus is a multimodal corpus recorded over two successive days. Each day resulted in approximately 4 h of recordings. In total five participants took part in the recordings of whom two participants were female and three were male. Seven video cameras were used of which at least one was trained on each participant. The Optitrack motion capture kit was used in order to enrich information. The D64 corpus comprises annotations on conversational involvement, speech activity and pauses as well as information of the average degree of change in the movement of participants.

79 citations