scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Francesca Bartoli

Bio: Francesca Bartoli is an academic researcher from University of Milan. The author has contributed to research in topics: Delphi method. The author has an hindex of 2, co-authored 3 publications receiving 20 citations.
Topics: Delphi method

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: EreKA is a novel algorithm that accurately predicts the risk of aPL-associated PM by considering aPL titres and profiles and allows a tailored therapeutic approach, impacting everyday clinical management of a PL-positive pregnant women.
Abstract: Objectives aPL, the serum biomarkers of APS, are the most common acquired causes of pregnancy morbidity (PM). This study investigates the impact of aPL positivity fulfilling classification criteria ('criteria aPL') and at titres lower than thresholds considered by classification criteria ('low-titre aPL') on PM and assesses the effectiveness of low-dose aspirin (LDASA), low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) and HCQ in reducing the probability of PM (PPM). Methods Longitudinal data on 847 pregnancies in 155 women with persistent aPL at any titre and 226 women with autoimmune diseases and negative aPL were retrospectively collected. A generalized estimating equations model for repeated measures was applied to quantify PPM under different clinical situations. Results EUREKA is a novel algorithm that accurately predicts the risk of aPL-associated PM by considering aPL titres and profiles. aPL significantly impact PPM when at low titres and when fulfilling classification criteria. PPM was further stratified upon the aPL tests: aCL IgG/IgM and anti-β2-glycoprotein I (β2GPI) IgM, alone or combined, do not affect the basal risks of PPM, an increase occurs in case of positive LA or anti-β2GPI IgG. LDASA significantly affects PPM exclusively in women with low-titre aPL without anti-β2GPI IgG. The LDASA + LMWH combination significantly reduces PPM in all women with low-titre aPL and women with criteria aPL, except those carrying LA and anti-β2GPI IgG. In this group, the addition of HCQ further reduces PPM, although not significantly. Conclusion EUREKA allows a tailored therapeutic approach, impacting everyday clinical management of aPL-positive pregnant women.

34 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A reporting checklist of 33 items, based on practical suggestions made (using a Delphi process) by international participants, has been developed to provide guidance to improve and standardize the NVC methodology to be applied in future clinical research studies.
Abstract: Objectives The level of detail included when describing nailfold videocapillaroscopy (NVC) methods varies among research studies, making interpretation and comparison of results challenging. The overarching objective of the present study was to seek consensus on the reporting standards in NVC methodology for clinical research in rheumatic diseases and to propose a pragmatic reporting checklist. Methods Based on the items derived from a systematic review focused on this topic, a three-step web-based Delphi consensus on minimum reporting standards in NVC was performed among members of the European League against Rheumatism (EULAR) Study Group on Microcirculation in Rheumatic Diseases and the Scleroderma Clinical Trials Consortium. Results A total of 319 articles were selected by the systematic review, and 46 items were proposed in the Delphi process. This Delphi exercise was completed by 80 participants from 31 countries, including Australia and countries within Asia, Europe, North America and South America. Agreement was reached on items covering three main areas: patient preparation before NVC (15 items), device description (5 items) and examination details (13 items). Conclusion Based on the available evidence, the description of NVC methods was highly heterogeneous in the identified studies and differed markedly on several items. A reporting checklist of 33 items, based on practical suggestions made (using a Delphi process) by international participants, has been developed to provide guidance to improve and standardize the NVC methodology to be applied in future clinical research studies.

21 citations

Proceedings ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This study investigates how treatment with HCQ, prescribed in different combinations with low-dose aspirin (LDASA) and low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH), affects the probability of pregnancy morbidity (PPM).
Abstract: Background: Hydroxychloroquine is an anti-malarial drug that not only exerts immunomodulatory and anti-thrombotic properties, but also has been shown to reverse several effects mediated by anti-phospholipid antibodies (aPL) in models of obstetric anti-phospholipid syndrome (APS). Not surprisingly, HCQ, whose prescription during gestation is perfectly safe, has been proposed as an additional therapeutic tool in obstetric APS, but evidence of ist efficacy is still scant. Objectives: This study investigates how treatment with HCQ, prescribed in different combinations with low-dose aspirin (LDASA) and low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH), affects the probability of pregnancy morbidity (PPM). Methods: Data on pregnancies in women with persistent aPL positivity at any titre, with or without autoimmune diseases, were retrospectively collected at a single centre. A weigthed generalized estimated equation (GEE) model was applied to quantify the effect of treatment with HCQ on PPM, allowing to: i) evaluate pregnancy outcomes over time using available longitudinal data; ii) account that pregnancies of the same woman are not independent events; iii) consider that women had a different number of pregnancies; iv) estimate the role of several confounders and predictors. The model envisaged as dependent variable pregnancy outcome as a binary outcome, defined for each pregnancy as “obstetric complication yes versus no” (pregnancy loss before 10 weeks, pregnancy loss after 10 weeks, premature birth before 34 weeks, according to updated APS classification criteria). Results: Three-hundred-eighty-one women were recruited in this study: 155 women with aPL positivity (100 women with positivity for criteria aPL and 55 women with low titer aPL) and 226 women with autoimmune diseases but negative aPL. Data were collected on 847 pregnancies: 458 in women with positive aPL (172 in women with criteria aPL and 286 in women with low titer aPL) and 389 in women with autoimmune disease and negative aPL. PPM in untreated patients are presented in Table 1. Table 2 reports PPM in women receiving LDASA+/- HCQ, LDASA + LMWH +/- HCQ. Conclusion: HCQ, when added to LDASA or on the top of standard treatment with LDASA and LMWH, allows to reduce PPM. Most importantly, HCQ plus the combo LMWH + LDASA leads to a significantly reduction of PPM even in women at highest risk, namely those with multiple criteria aPL positivity. References: [1] Miyakis S, et al. J Thromb Haemost. 2006;4(2):295-306 [2] Sciascia S, et al. Thromb Haemost. 2016;115(2):285-90. [3] Ruffatti A, et al. Thromb Haemost. 2018;118(4):639-646. Disclosure of Interests: Cecilia Chighizola Speakers bureau: Inova Diagnostics, Francesca Pregnolato: None declared, Francesca Bartoli: None declared, Maria Gerosa: None declared, Chiara Comerio: None declared, Maria Gabriella Raimondi: None declared, Laura Trespidi: None declared, Maria Orietta Borghi: None declared, Manuela Wally Ossola: None declared, Enrico Ferrazzi: None declared, Pier Luigi Meroni Consultant for: Inova, Thermofisher, Teofarma

Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: APL in COVID-19 patients are mainly directed against β2GPI but display an epitope specificity different from antibodies in antiphospholipid syndrome, which shows a low prevalence and is not associated with major thrombotic events.
Abstract: Background Critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have a profound hypercoagulable state and often develop coagulopathy which leads to organ failure and death. Because of a prolonged activated partial-thromboplastin time (aPTT), a relationship with anti-phospholipid antibodies (aPLs) has been proposed, but results are controversial. Functional assays for aPL (i.e., lupus anticoagulant) can be influenced by concomitant anticoagulation and/or high levels of C reactive protein. The presence of anti-cardiolipin (aCL), anti-beta2-glycoprotein I (anti-β2GPI), and anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin (aPS/PT) antibodies was not investigated systematically. Epitope specificity of anti-β2GPI antibodies was not reported. Objective To evaluate the prevalence and the clinical association of aPL in a large cohort of COVID-19 patients, and to characterize the epitope specificity of anti-β2GPI antibodies. Methods ELISA and chemiluminescence assays were used to test 122 sera of patients suffering from severe COVID-19. Of them, 16 displayed major thrombotic events. Results Anti-β2GPI IgG/IgA/IgM was the most frequent in 15.6/6.6/9.0% of patients, while aCL IgG/IgM was detected in 5.7/6.6% by ELISA. Comparable values were found by chemiluminescence. aPS/PT IgG/IgM were detectable in 2.5 and 9.8% by ELISA. No association between thrombosis and aPL was found. Reactivity against domain 1 and 4-5 of β2GPI was limited to 3/58 (5.2%) tested sera for each domain and did not correlate with aCL/anti-β2GPI nor with thrombosis. Conclusions aPL show a low prevalence in COVID-19 patients and are not associated with major thrombotic events. aPL in COVID-19 patients are mainly directed against β2GPI but display an epitope specificity different from antibodies in antiphospholipid syndrome.

137 citations

Journal Article
TL;DR: In this paper, simple definitions of hairpin, tortuous or crossing were proposed for describing morphology of capillaries by rheumatologists with varying levels of expertise, and inter-rater agreement was assessed by calculation of proportion of agreement and by kappa coefficients.
Abstract: OBJECTIVE To propose simple capillaroscopic definitions for interpretation of capillaroscopic morphologies and to assess inter-rater reliability. METHODS The simple definitions proposed were: normal--hairpin, tortuous or crossing; abnormal--not hairpin, not tortuous and not crossing; not evaluable--whenever rater undecided between normal and abnormal. Based upon an aimed kappa of 0.80 and default prevalences of normal (0.4), abnormal (0.4) and not evaluable (0.2) capillaries, 90 single capillaries were presented to three groups of raters: experienced independent raters, n = 5; attendees of the sixth EULAR capillaroscopy course, n = 34; novices after a 1-h course, n = 11. Inter-rater agreement was assessed by calculation of proportion of agreement and by kappa coefficients. RESULTS Mean kappa based on 90 capillaries was 0.47 (95% CI: 0.39, 0.54) for expert raters, 0.40 (95% CI: 0.36, 0.44) for attendees and 0.46 (95% CI: 0.41, 0.52) for novices, with overall agreements of 67% (95% CI: 63, 71), 63% (95% CI: 60, 65) and 67% (95% CI: 63, 70), respectively. Comparing only normal vs the combined groups of abnormal and not evaluable capillaries did increase the kappa: 0.51 (95% CI: 0.37 ,: 0.65), 0.53 (95% CI: 0.49, 0.58) and 0.55 (95% CI: 0.49, 0.62). On the condition that the capillaries were classifiable, the mean kappa was 0.62 (95% CI: 0.50, 0.74) for expert raters (n = 65), 0.76 (95% CI: 0.69, 0.83) for attendees (n = 20) and 0.81 (95% CI: 0.74, 0.89) for novices (n = 44). CONCLUSION This multicentre, international study showed moderate reliability of simple capillaroscopic definitions for describing morphology of capillaries by rheumatologists with varying levels of expertise. Novices were capable of distinguishing normal from abnormal capillaries by means of a 1-h training session. In future studies, the class not evaluable may be obsolete.

99 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This work revisited recent insights and concerns about the pathophysiology, diagnosis and management of OAPS and revisited new risk assessment tools that could improve the prediction of obstetric complication recurrences or thromboses.
Abstract: Antiphospholipid syndrome is an autoimmune disorder characterized by vascular thrombosis and/or pregnancy morbidity associated with persistent antiphospholipid antibody positivity. Cases fulfilling the Sydney criteria for obstetric morbidity with no previous thrombosis are known as obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome (OAPS). OAPS is the most identified cause of recurrent pregnancy loss and late-pregnancy morbidity related to placental injury. Cases with incomplete clinical or laboratory data are classified as obstetric morbidity APS (OMAPS) and non-criteria OAPS (NC-OAPS), respectively. Inflammatory and thrombotic mechanisms are involved in the pathophysiology of OAPS. Trophoblasts, endothelium, platelets and innate immune cells are key cellular players. Complement activation plays a crucial pathogenic role. Secondary placental thrombosis appears by clot formation in response to tissue factor activation. New risk assessment tools could improve the prediction of obstetric complication recurrences or thromboses. The standard-of-care treatment consists of low-dose aspirin and prophylactic low molecular weight heparin. In refractory cases, the addition of hydroxychloroquine, low-dose prednisone or IVIG improve pregnancy outcomes. Statins and eculizumab are currently being tested for treating selected OAPS women. Finally, we revisited recent insights and concerns about the pathophysiology, diagnosis and management of OAPS.

20 citations

Posted ContentDOI
16 Jul 2020-medRxiv
TL;DR: APL in COVID-19 patients are mainly directed against {beta}2GPI but display an epitope specificity different from antibodies in antiphospholipid syndrome, which is not associated with major thrombotic events.
Abstract: Background Critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have a profound hypercoagulable state and often develop coagulopathy which leads to organ failure and death. Because of a prolonged activated partial-thromboplastin time (aPTT), a relationship with anti-phospholipid antibodies (aPL) has been proposed, but results are controversial. Functional assays for aPL (i.e., lupus anticoagulant) can be influenced by concomitant anticoagulation and/or high levels of C reactive protein. The presence of anti-cardiolipin (aCL), anti-beta2-glycoprotein I (anti-β2GPI) and anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin (aPS/PT) antibodies was not investigated systematically. Epitope specificity of anti-β2GPI antibodies was not reported. Objective To evaluate the prevalence and the clinical association of aPL in a large cohort of COVID-19 patients, and to characterize the epitope specificity of anti-β2GPI antibodies. Methods ELISA and chemiluminescence assays were used to test 122 sera of patients suffering from severe COVID-19. Of them, 16 displayed major thrombotic events. Results Anti-β2GPI IgG/IgA/IgM were the most frequent in 15.6/6.6/9.0% of patients, while aCL IgG/IgM were detected in 5.7/6.6% by ELISA. Comparable values were found by chemiluminescence. aPS/PT IgG/IgM were detectable in 2.5 and 9.8% by ELISA. No association between thrombosis and aPL was found. Reactivity against domain 1 and 4-5 of β2GPI was limited to 3/58 (5.2%) tested sera for each domain and did not correlate with aCL/anti-β2GPI nor with thrombosis. Conclusions aPL show a low prevalence in COVID-19 patients and are not associated with major thrombotic events. aPL in COVID-19 patients are mainly directed against β2GPI but display an epitope specificity different from antibodies in antiphospholipid syndrome.

17 citations

DOI
01 Jan 2021
TL;DR: In this article, the authors focus on the laboratory aspects, the clinical relevance of assays and interpretation of aPL results in the diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS).
Abstract: The diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) relies on the detection of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). Currently, lupus anticoagulant (LA), anticardiolipin (aCL), and antibeta2-glycoprotein I antibodies (aβ2GPI) IgG or IgM are included as laboratory criteria, if persistently present. LAC measurement remains a complicated procedure with many pitfalls and interfered by anticoagulant therapy. Solid-phase assays for aCL and aβ2GPI show interassay differences. These methodological issues make the laboratory diagnosis of APS challenging. In the interpretation of aPL. results, antibody profiles help in identifying patients at risk. Other aPL, such as antibodies against the domain I of beta2-glycoprotein (aDI) and antiphosphatidylserine-prothrombin (aPS/PT) antibodies have been studied in the last years and may be useful in risk stratification of APS patients. Because of the methodological shortcomings of immunological and clotting assays, these non-criteria aPL may be useful in patients with incomplete antibody profiles to confirm or exclude the increased risk profile. This manuscript will focus on the laboratory aspects, the clinical relevance of assays and interpretation of aPL results in the diagnosis of APS.

14 citations