Thank you for downloading using multivariate statistics. As you may know, people have look hundreds times for their favorite novels like this using multivariate statistics, but end up in infectious downloads. Rather than reading a good book with a cup of tea in the afternoon, instead they juggled with some harmful bugs inside their laptop. using multivariate statistics is available in our digital library an online access to it is set as public so you can download it instantly. Our books collection saves in multiple locations, allowing you to get the most less latency time to download any of our books like this one. Merely said, the using multivariate statistics is universally compatible with any devices to read.

Using Multivariate Statistics

Introduction 1. Woman's Place in Man's Life Cycle 2. Images of Relationship 3. Concepts of Self and Morality 4. Crisis and Transition 5. Women's Rights and Women's Judgment 6. Visions of Maturity References Index of Study Participants General Index

In a Different Voice. Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Cambridge, MA (Harvard University Press) 1982.

The present article presents a meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. With 713 independent samples from 515 studies, the meta-analysis finds that intergroup contact typically reduces intergroup prejudice. Multiple tests indicate that this finding appears not to result from either participant selection or publication biases, and the more rigorous studies yield larger mean effects. These contact effects typically generalize to the entire outgroup, and they emerge across a broad range of outgroup targets and contact settings. Similar patterns also emerge for samples with racial or ethnic targets and samples with other targets. This result suggests that contact theory, devised originally for racial and ethnic encounters, can be extended to other groups. A global indicator of Allport's optimal contact conditions demonstrates that contact under these conditions typically leads to even greater reduction in prejudice. Closer examination demonstrates that these conditions are best conceptualized as an interrelated bundle rather than as independent factors. Further, the meta-analytic findings indicate that these conditions are not essential for prejudice reduction. Hence, future work should focus on negative factors that prevent intergroup contact from diminishing prejudice as well as the development of a more comprehensive theory of intergroup contact.

A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory.

What good is self-control? We incorporated a new measure of individual differences in self-control into two large investigations of a broad spectrum of behaviors. The new scale showed good internal consistency and retest reliability. Higher scores on self-control correlated with a higher grade point average, better adjustment (fewer reports of psychopathology, higher self-esteem), less binge eating and alcohol abuse, better relationships and interpersonal skills, secure attachment, and more optimal emotional responses. Tests for curvilinearity failed to indicate any drawbacks of so-called overcontrol, and the positive effects remained after controlling for social desirability. Low self-control is thus a significant risk factor for a broad range of personal and interpersonal problems.

/pdf/high-self-control-predicts-good-adjustment-less-pathology-19qckrshli.pdf

High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success.

1. Introduction and Overview. 2. Detecting Influential Observations and Outliers. 3. Detecting and Assessing Collinearity. 4. Applications and Remedies. 5. Research Issues and Directions for Extensions. Bibliography. Author Index. Subject Index.

Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity

This chapter covers what has happened in the thirty years following the original publication of Reaffirming Rehabilitation and, in turn, explores where corrections should head in the future. The discussion begins with a description of the “mean season” in corrections that took hold following the decline of the rehabilitative ideal. Special attention is paid to the mass imprisonment movement and how this “great prison experiment” was largely a failure. Many punitively oriented interventions (e.g., intensive supervision programs) are shown to have been ineffective—a case of “correctional quackery.” Alternatively, increasing evidence exists that rehabilitation reduces recidivism, especially when it follows the principles of effective treatment identified by the “RNR paradigm.” Finally, the chapter outlines an agenda for the future of corrections that includes five recommendations: (1) build on the public’s support of rehabilitation as a core goal of corrections; (2) emphasize evidence-based corrections, with a special reliance on the RNR paradigm; (3) initiate early intervention programs; (4) hold correctional officials accountable for reducing recidivism; and (5) transform correctional practice into a profession.

The Future of Rehabilitation: From Nothing Works to What Works (An Epilogue)

Beefing Up Criminology: Longitudinal Research Is Not The Only Answer

A Theory of Sex Trafficking Victimization

Strain, Imprisonment, and Recidivism: A Test of General Strain Theory

The first goal of the study was to investigate the willingness of former President Trump's supporters to punish a particular form of white-collar crime (i.e., bank fraud). The second objective was to test whether the race of the person who committed the bank fraud influenced Trump supporters' willingness to punish.This study used data from factorial vignettes that were administered to a national sample of adults in 2021 (N = 1509). A 2 (race of the individual who committed bank fraud) × 2 (prior criminal record) × 2 (COVID-19 related fraud) between-subject experimental design was used. Multivariate techniques were used to regress the dependent variables (e.g., length of prison sentence) onto the faith in Trump scale, the experimental conditions, and other variables.Participants who expressed a strong faith in Trump were less likely to support sending an adult male who committed bank fraud to prison, but they were more supportive of deporting the individual to another country. The effect of faith in Trump changed when the race of the person who committed bank fraud was manipulated. Specifically, participants who expressed greater faith in Trump were more likely to view bank fraud as harmful and wrong, more likely to support the use of prison and recommend longer prison sentences, and expressed greater support for deporting the individual when he was depicted as Chinese American.Allegiance to the former president likely increased the targeting of Chinese Americans as out-group members in need of greater social control.The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11292-022-09528-8. 

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11292-022-09528-8.pdf

Francis T. Cullen

Papers

The Future of Rehabilitation: From Nothing Works to What Works (An Epilogue)

Beefing Up Criminology: Longitudinal Research Is Not The Only Answer

A Theory of Sex Trafficking Victimization

Strain, Imprisonment, and Recidivism: A Test of General Strain Theory

Faith in Trump and the willingness to punish white-collar crime: Chinese Americans as an out-group