Showing papers by "Frans van den Bosch published in 1996"
01 Jan 1996
TL;DR: In this article, a model of competence building through knowledge management in downstream alliances is presented. But the authors focus on how clients can contribute to the development of the knowledge base of knowledge-intensive business service firms.
Abstract: In a business service context, client alliances may provide an important way to build the competences of the service firm. The close interaction with the client in service delivery offers an opportunity for a business service firm to absorb knowledge from the client. This chapter adds to our understanding of managing the process of learning and knowledge transfer by looking at
how clients can contribute to the development of the knowledge base of knowledge-intensive business service firms. Combining insights from the resource-based literature, this chapter develops a model of competence building through knowledge management in downstream alliances.
32 citations
••
TL;DR: In this article, a conceptual framework is developed for reconciling the observed tension and pinpointing a key common characteristic of a European style of management, and a case study of Unilever Foods Europe is used to illustrate the proposed conceptual framework.
Abstract: textIn 1991, Thurley and Wirdenius claimed that international companies operating in European countries could, and should, make a strategic choice whether or not to develop a "European" approach or style of management. After the acceptance of the Treaty of Maastricht, and with the new European Union preparing to absorb applicants from the European Free Trade Association, their claim is becoming even more important. Not surprisingly, a European style of management, or "European management," is an important topic for business, business schools, and academic research. While a growing number of publications have been written on this subject, a brief review of the literature on European management reveals a clear tension between "integration opportunity" and "constraining diversity" issues as a challenging problem for managers in Europe. This article investigates whether key characteristics of a European style of management can be discerned. To this end, a conceptual framework is developed for reconciling the observed tension and pinpointing a key common characteristic of a European style of management. No attempt is made here to show that national styles of management such as Swedish or British management (Barsoux and Lawrence, 1990) will disappear in the future. On the contrary, we maintain that national styles of management are and will remain part of Europe's diversity (Lessem and Neubauer, 1994). We aim to improve our understanding of how management relates to the European business environment as a contingency factor. In particular, we investigate ways of approaching the above-mentioned management problem in Europe. In a general sense, our research contributes to the challenging field of international management research (Earley and Singh, 1995) as well. We begin with a short overview of the literature and draw attention to the tension between integration opportunities and constraining diversity for managers in Europe. We then introduce a managerial perspective in describing various relevant forms of an important contextual variable of Europe--namely, diversity. After developing a conceptual framework for reconciling this tension, we describe how this framework can focus attention on a key characteristic of a European style of management. We use a case study of Unilever Foods Europe to illustrate the proposed conceptual framework. In discussing our findings, we touch upon some implications for developing the distinctive managerial skills required by a European style of management and suggest directions for future research.
7 citations
••
01 Jan 1996
TL;DR: Inleiding. as discussed by the authors, Bower (1970) studie 'Managing the Resource Allocation Process' aan dit financiel-economisch perspectief een management mindset toegevoegd.
Abstract: textInleiding. Bij besluitvorming over strategische investeringsprojecten
kan het voortbestaan van de
betrokken onderneming in het geding zijn. Dan is
het van groot belang om naast de te verwachten
rentabiliteit van de investeringsprojecten, tevens
aandacht te schenken aan de belangen van betrokkenen
binnen en buiten de onderneming. Investeringsprojecten
worden van oudsher beoordeeld
vanuit een financieel-economisch perspectief op
basis van rationele selectiecriteria met betrekking
tot de investeringsbeslissing. In de jaren zeventig
is met name door Bowers (1970) studie 'Managing
the Resource Allocation Process' aan dit
financieel-economisch perspectief een management
perspectief toegevoegd. Bower bracht
daarmee het belang van het betrekken van het
interne besluitvormingsproces bij investeringsbeslissingen
in beeld. In de jaren tachtig en negentig
zijn de dynamiek en complexiteit van de interacties
tussen onderneming en omgeving verder
toegenomen. Het management van deze interactie
of 'interfaces' heeft de invloed van en de aandacht
voorexterne stakeholders ook met betrekking tot
strategische investeringsbeslissingen verder doen
toenemen.
5 citations
••
TL;DR: In this article, Maljers, Baden-Fuller and van den Bosch explore the inherent tensions which exist between stability and change and argue that too much change is disastrous.
4 citations
01 May 1996
TL;DR: In this article, the authors considered the situation as a managerial problem which is particularly relevant for the boards of the producer-controlled co-operatives in the Dutch potato sector and applied it to the potato sector.
Abstract: The Dutch potato sector is strongly internationally oriented, and has a leading position in the European Union (EU) as well as in world markets. Furthermore, the Dutch potato processing industry is by far the biggest in the EU. The position of the Dutch potato sector is seriously threatened by increasing international competition as well as by changes in the Common Agricultural Policy (Kearney[l]). Given these changes in the business environment, especially the increasing market influence of demand side actors (e.g. retailer organizations, wholesalers), firms in the Dutch potato sector are facing strategic reorientation and a re-evaluation of their governance structures (Leeuwen & Veerman et al. [2], Groot et al.[3]). Departing from the principle that a relationship exists between arrangements of activities, intra-firm and inter-firm linkages, as well as managerial action (Van den Bosch[4], Porter[5]), the situation as was described above can be regarded as a managerial problem which is particularly relevant for the boards of the producer-controlled co-operatives. However, until recently the focus of studies in the field of governance structures was directed to problems and phenomena at industrylevel (e.g. Lamont[6], Miniataite[7]). Research concerning managerial reactions to increasing dependency and uncertainty regarding the business environment is more commonly performed in manufacturing and services industries (e.g. De Man[8], Rademakers & Van Valkengoed[9]). This is also true with respect to investigating issues on vertical and horizontal integration, as well as organizational alternatives for the governance of intraand inter-firm activities (Grandori & Soda[10], Porter[5], Whitley[ll]). Using the findings of research on manufacturing and services industries, and applying as well as testing these to the potato sector, can add to our body of knowledge. An example of this is
3 citations
•
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present a case study over the complexity of stakeholder management in the context of corporate governance, and discuss the role of stakeholders in the process of stakeholdermanagement.
Abstract: textInleiding. In discussies over corporate
governance en
ondernemingsdoelstellingen
woedt een
strijd tussen twee uitersten.
Aanhangers van het
stockholdermodel vinden
dat het management
uitsluitend verantwoording
moet afleggen aan de
aandeelhouders, terwijl
anderen argumenteren voor
het stakeholdermodel,
waarin het management de
belangen van vele
belanghebbenden tegelijk
in het oog moet houden. In
de praktijk overlappen
beide modellen elkaar. stockholders versus
stakeholders onttrekken
het zicht op de complexiteit
van stakeholdermanagement,
de inzet die
daarbij gepleegd moet
worden door het
management alsmede de
daaraan verbonden
uitdagingen.
Case-studies over
stakeholder-management
kunnen deze complexiteit
belichten en mede daardoor
inzicht verschaffen in de
merites van het
stakeholdermodel voor het
management. Dit artikel
wil daartoe een bijdrage
leveren door eerst aan de
hand van een bekend
framework een kort
theoretisch overzicht te
geven van stakeholdermanagement.
Vervolgens
komt een beknopte casestudie
aan de orde waarin nieuwe vormen van
stakeholder-management
worden beschreven. De
case-studie beschrijft het
proces van de strategische
besluitvorming en het
stakeholder-management
inzake het megaproject
Per+, de grootscheepse
modernisering van Shell's
olieraffinaderij in
Pernis/Rotterdam. De
nadruk ligt daarbij op het
combineren van intern en
extern stakeholdermanagement
en op de vraag
welke nieuwe
managementinzichten
daaraan zijn te ontlenen
voor de proces- en
transactie-dimensie van
stakeholder-management.
2 citations