scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Fritz Schöffl

Bio: Fritz Schöffl is an academic researcher from University of Tübingen. The author has contributed to research in topics: Heat shock factor & Heat shock protein. The author has an hindex of 19, co-authored 36 publications receiving 2553 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The heat-shock response is a conserved reaction of cells and organisms to elevated temperatures (heat shock or heat stress).
Abstract: The heat-shock response is a conserved reaction of cells and organisms to elevated temperatures (heat shock or heat stress). Whereas severe heat stress leads to cellular damage and cell death, sublethal doses of heat stress induce a cellular response, the heat-shock response, which (a) protects

421 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The results document that in the immediate early phase of the heat shock response HSF-dependent gene expression is not limited to known stress genes, which are involved in protection from proteotoxic effects, and also affects other pathways and mechanisms dealing with a broader range of physiological adaptations to stress.
Abstract: In order to assess specific functional roles of plant heat shock transcription factors (HSF) we conducted a transcriptome analysis of Arabidopsis thaliana hsfA1a/hsfA1b double knock out mutants and wild-type plants. We used Affymetrix ATH1 microarrays (representing more than 24 000 genes) and conducted hybridizations for heat-treated or non-heat-treated leaf material of the respective lines. Heat stress had a severe impact on the transcriptome of mutant and wild-type plants. Approximately 11% of all monitored genes of the wild type showed a significant effect upon heat stress treatment. The difference in heat stress-induced gene expression between mutant and wild type revealed a number of HsfA1a/1b-regulated genes. Besides several heat shock protein and other stress-related genes, we found HSFA-1a/1b-regulated genes for other functions including protein biosynthesis and processing, signalling, metabolism and transport. By screening the profiling data for genes in biochemical pathways in which known HSF targets were involved, we discovered that at each step in the pathway leading to osmolytes, the expression of genes is regulated by heat stress and in several cases by HSF. Our results document that in the immediate early phase of the heat shock response HSF-dependent gene expression is not limited to known stress genes, which are involved in protection from proteotoxic effects. HsfA1a and HsfA1b-regulated gene expression also affects other pathways and mechanisms dealing with a broader range of physiological adaptations to stress.

350 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The results indicate that genetic engineering using protein fusion is a very effective means to derepress the activity of an important regulatory protein in plants, that consequently activates a constitutive hs response in the absence of heat stress and eventually alters the thermotolerance phenotype.
Abstract: ATHSF1 is a heat shock transcription factor (HSF) of Arabidopsis that is constitutively expressed but its activity for DNA binding, trimer formation and transcriptional activation of heat shock (hs) genes is repressed at normal temperatures. In this study the functional properties of chimeric HSF-glucuronidase (GUS) fusion proteins were tested. Ectopic expression of HSF-GUS or GUS-HSF in transgenic Arabidopsis plants resulted in a derepression of HSF functions as shown by trimer formation, specific DNA binding, and the constitutive expression of heat shock proteins (HSPs) at normal temperature. A novel GUS activity-staining protocol was used to show the specific binding of trimeric HSF fusion proteins to DNA and following hs, an interaction between chimeric HSF-GUS and authentic HSF proteins. The chimeric HSFs were insensitive to the negative regulation that counteracts activation of the authentic HSF at normal temperature. Heterotrimer complexes were reconstituted in vitro from recombinant ATHSF1 and HSF-GUS proteins expressed in Escherichia coli and using this protocol, the temperature-dependent activation of wt HSF was monitored in vivo and in vitro. Transgenic plants expressing constitutively active HSF-GUS fusion proteins are also constitutive for HSPs. Approximately 20% of the maximum heat-inducible levels of HSP18 were already present at normal temperature. The level of basic thermotolerance was significantly enhanced in these plants. The results indicate that genetic engineering using protein fusion is a very effective means to derepress the activity of an important regulatory protein in plants, that consequently activates a constitutive hs response in the absence of heat stress and eventually alters the thermotolerance phenotype.

266 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Evidence is provided that GolS1 is a novel HSF target gene, which is responsible for heat stress-dependent synthesis of raffinose, a member of the raff inose family oligosaccharides, and the biological function of this osmoprotective substance and the role of HSF-dependent genes in this biochemical pathway are discussed.
Abstract: Heat shock factors (HSFs) are transcriptional regulators of the heat shock response. The major target of HSFs are the genes encoding heat shock proteins (HSPs), which are known to have a protective function that counteracts cytotoxic effects. To identify other HSF target genes, which may be important determinants for the generation of stress tolerance in Arabidopsis, we screened a library enriched for genes that are up-regulated in HSF3 (AtHsfA1b)-overexpressing transgenic plants (TPs). Galactinol synthase1 (GolS1) is one of the genes that is heat-inducible in wild type, but shows constitutive mRNA levels in HSF3 TPs. The generation and analysis of TPs containing GolS1-promoter::β-glucuronidase-reporter gene constructs showed that, upon heat stress, the expression is transcriptionally controlled and occurs in all vegetative tissues. Functional consequences of GolS1 expression were investigated by the quantification of raffinose, stachyose, and galactinol contents in wild type, HSF3 TPs, and two different GolS1 knockout mutants (gols1-1 and gols1-2). This analysis demonstrates that (1) raffinose content in leaves increases upon heat stress in wild-type but not in the GolS1 mutant plants; and (2) the level of raffinose is enhanced and stachyose is present at normal temperature in HSF3 TPs. These data provide evidence that GolS1 is a novel HSF target gene, which is responsible for heat stress-dependent synthesis of raffinose, a member of the raffinose family oligosaccharides. The biological function of this osmoprotective substance and the role of HSF-dependent genes in this biochemical pathway are discussed.

248 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The data indicate that AtHSF1 and AtHSf3 are key regulators of the immediate stress-induced activation of HS gene transcription, and consequently determine the kinetics of the negative feed back loop that is responsible for the transience ofHS gene expression in wild type.
Abstract: In order to assess the specific functional roles of different plant heat shock transcription factors (HSFs) we have isolated T-DNA insertion mutants in the AtHsf1 and AtHsf3 genes of Arabidopsis thaliana. Complete and selective loss of the promoter binding activities of AtHSF1 or AtHSF3, verified by immunoprecipitation assays, had no obvious effects on the heat shock (HS) response in the individual mutant lines. Only hsf1 -- /hsf3 -- double mutants were significantly impaired in HS gene expression. In these plants the inability to form high-molecular-weight HSE-binding complexes correlates with a dramatic change in the kinetics of mRNA accumulation from all HSF target genes tested, including members of the Hsp100, Hsp90, Hsp70 and small Hsp families, and genes for two heat-inducible class B-HSFs. After prolonged HS, the amounts of most heat shock mRNAs expressed, except transcripts of Hsp18.2, reached approximately the same levels as in wild type plants. Our data indicate that AtHSF1 and AtHSF3 are key regulators of the immediate stress-induced activation of HS gene transcription, and consequently determine the kinetics of the negative feed back loop that is responsible for the transience of HS gene expression in wild type.

199 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This work discloses that expression of Hsps can occur in nature, all species have hsp genes but they vary in the patterns of their expression, and Hsp expression can be correlated with resistance to stress, and species' thresholds for HSP expression are correlated with levels of stress that they naturally undergo.
Abstract: Molecular chaperones, including the heat-shock proteins (Hsps), are a ubiquitous feature of cells in which these proteins cope with stress-induced denaturation of other proteins. Hsps have received the most attention in model organisms undergoing experimental stress in the laboratory, and the function of Hsps at the molecular and cellular level is becoming well understood in this context. A complementary focus is now emerging on the Hsps of both model and nonmodel organisms undergoing stress in nature, on the roles of Hsps in the stress physiology of whole multicellular eukaryotes and the tissues and organs they comprise, and on the ecological and evolutionary correlates of variation in Hsps and the genes that encode them. This focus discloses that (a) expression of Hsps can occur in nature, (b) all species have hsp genes but they vary in the patterns of their expression, (c) Hsp expression can be correlated with resistance to stress, and (d) species' thresholds for Hsp expression are correlated with levels of stress that they naturally undergo. These conclusions are now well established and may require little additional confirmation; many significant questions remain unanswered concerning both the mechanisms of Hsp-mediated stress tolerance at the organismal level and the evolutionary mechanisms that have diversified the hsp genes.

3,841 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
26 Sep 2003-Planta
TL;DR: The present review summarizes the recent advances in elucidating stress-response mechanisms and their biotechnological applications and examines the following aspects: regulatory controls, metabolite engineering, ion transport, antioxidants and detoxification, late embryogenesis abundant (LEA) and heat-shock proteins.
Abstract: Abiotic stresses, such as drought, salinity, extreme temperatures, chemical toxicity and oxidative stress are serious threats to agriculture and the natural status of the environment. Increased salinization of arable land is expected to have devastating global effects, resulting in 30% land loss within the next 25 years, and up to 50% by the year 2050. Therefore, breeding for drought and salinity stress tolerance in crop plants (for food supply) and in forest trees (a central component of the global ecosystem) should be given high research priority in plant biotechnology programs. Molecular control mechanisms for abiotic stress tolerance are based on the activation and regulation of specific stress-related genes. These genes are involved in the whole sequence of stress responses, such as signaling, transcriptional control, protection of membranes and proteins, and free-radical and toxic-compound scavenging. Recently, research into the molecular mechanisms of stress responses has started to bear fruit and, in parallel, genetic modification of stress tolerance has also shown promising results that may ultimately apply to agriculturally and ecologically important plants. The present review summarizes the recent advances in elucidating stress-response mechanisms and their biotechnological applications. Emphasis is placed on transgenic plants that have been engineered based on different stress-response mechanisms. The review examines the following aspects: regulatory controls, metabolite engineering, ion transport, antioxidants and detoxification, late embryogenesis abundant (LEA) and heat-shock proteins.

3,248 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
15 Dec 2000-Science
TL;DR: The completion of the Arabidopsis thaliana genome sequence allows a comparative analysis of transcriptional regulators across the three eukaryotic kingdoms and reveals the evolutionary generation of diversity in the regulation of transcription.
Abstract: The completion of the Arabidopsis thaliana genome sequence allows a comparative analysis of transcriptional regulators across the three eukaryotic kingdoms. Arabidopsis dedicates over 5% of its genome to code for more than 1500 transcription factors, about 45% of which are from families specific to plants. Arabidopsis transcription factors that belong to families common to all eukaryotes do not share significant similarity with those of the other kingdoms beyond the conserved DNA binding domains, many of which have been arranged in combinations specific to each lineage. The genome-wide comparison reveals the evolutionary generation of diversity in the regulation of transcription.

2,582 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The significance of Hsps and chaperones in abiotic stress responses in plants is summarized, and the co-operation among their different classes and their interactions with other stress-induced components are discussed.

2,309 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The primary effect of low RWC on Apot is most probably caused by limited RuBP synthesis, as a result of decreased ATP synthesis, either through inhibition of Coupling Factor activity or amount due to increased ion concentration.
Abstract: Summary Experimental studies on CO2 assimilation of mesophytic C3 plants in relation to relative water content (RWC) are discussed. Decreasing RWC slows the actual rate of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation (A) and decreases the potential rate (Apot). Generally, as RWC falls from c. 100 to c. 75%, the stomatal conductance (gs) decreases, and with it A. However, there are two general types of relation of Apot to RWC, which are called Type 1 and Type 2. Type 1 has two main phases. As RWC decreases from 100 to c. 75%, Apot is unaffected, but decreasing stomatal conductance (gs) results in smaller A, and lower CO2 concentration inside the leaf (Ci) and in the chloroplast (Cc), the latter falling possibly to the compensation point. Down-regulation of electron transport occurs by energy quenching mechanisms, and changes in carbohydrate and nitrogen metabolism are considered acclimatory, caused by low Ci and reversible by elevated CO2. Below 75% RWC, there is metabolic inhibition of Apot, inhibition of A then being partly (but progressively less) reversible by elevated CO2; gs regulates A progressively less, and Ci and CO2 compensation point, Γ rise. It is suggested that this is the true stress phase, where the decrease in Apot is caused by decreased ATP synthesis and a consequent decreased synthesis of RuBP. In the Type 2 response, Apot decreases progressively at RWC 100 to 75%, with A being progressively less restored to the unstressed value by elevated CO2. Decreased gs leads to a lower Ci and Cc but they probably do not reach compensation point: gs becomes progressively less important and metabolic limitations more important as RWC falls. The primary effect of low RWC on Apot is most probably caused by limited RuBP synthesis, as a result of decreased ATP synthesis, either through inhibition of Coupling Factor activity or amount due to increased ion concentration. Carbohydrate synthesis and accumulation decrease. Type 2 response is considered equivalent to Type 1 at RWC below c. 75%, with Apot inhibited by limited ATP and RuBP synthesis, respiratory metabolism dominates and Ci and Γ rise. The importance of inhibited ATP synthesis as a primary cause of decreasing Apot is discussed. Factors determining the Type 1 and Type 2 responses are unknown. Electron transport is maintained (but down-regulated) in Types 1 and 2 over a wide range of RWC, and a large reduced/oxidized adenylate ratio results. Metabolic imbalance results in amino acid accumulation and decreased and altered protein synthesis. These conditions profoundly affect cell functions and ultimately cause cell death. Type 1 and 2 responses may reflect differences in gs and in sensitivity of metabolism to decreasing RWC.

1,791 citations