scispace - formally typeset
G

G. C. Aers

Researcher at National Research Council

Publications -  158
Citations -  3545

G. C. Aers is an academic researcher from National Research Council. The author has contributed to research in topics: Quantum well & Quantum dot. The author has an hindex of 33, co-authored 158 publications receiving 3428 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Coherent control of three-spin states in a triple quantum dot

TL;DR: In this article, the spins across three electrical-gate-defined dots were manipulated to generate coherent superpositions of quantum states using the spins of three quantum-dot pairs, and the idea was extended to three quantum dots.
Journal ArticleDOI

Terahertz quantum-cascade lasers based on a three-well active module

TL;DR: In this article, a design of terahertz quantum-cascade lasers based on three-well active modules is presented. But the design is not suitable for the use of a large number of resonant phonons.
Journal ArticleDOI

Model for the field effect from layers of biological macromolecules on the gates of metal-oxide-semiconductor transistors

TL;DR: In this paper, the potential diagram for field effect transistors used to detect charged biological macromolecules in an electrolyte is presented for the case where an insulating cover layer is used over a conventional eletrolyte-insulator metal-oxide-semiconductor (EIMOS) structure to tether or bind the biological molecules to a floating gate.
Journal ArticleDOI

Photonic integrated circuits fabricated using ion implantation

TL;DR: In this paper, a technique based on ion implantation-induced QW intermixing was developed to enhance the QWI rate in selected areas of a wafer, which offers the prospect of a powerful and simple fabrication route for the integration of discrete optoelectronic devices and for forming photonic integrated circuits.
Journal ArticleDOI

Dwell time and phase times for transmission and reflection.

TL;DR: In this paper, it was shown that Babbuttiker's expression for the dwell time is correct, despite a recent claim to the contrary, and this fact was used in combination with a rigorous result derived by Hauge, Falck, and Fjeldly to prove that phase times associated with the interaction of a particle of energy E with a one-dimensional barrier cannot be identified with the corresponding phase times.