scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

G. De Luca

Other affiliations: University of L'Aquila
Bio: G. De Luca is an academic researcher from National Institute of Geophysics and Volcanology. The author has contributed to research in topics: Volcano & Tectonics. The author has an hindex of 14, co-authored 30 publications receiving 1989 citations. Previous affiliations of G. De Luca include University of L'Aquila.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
M. Punturo, M. R. Abernathy1, Fausto Acernese2, Benjamin William Allen3, Nils Andersson4, K. G. Arun5, Fabrizio Barone2, B. Barr1, M. Barsuglia6, M. G. Beker7, N. Beveridge1, S. Birindelli8, Suvadeep Bose9, L. Bosi, S. Braccini, C. Bradaschia, Tomasz Bulik10, Enrico Calloni, G. Cella, E. Chassande Mottin6, Simon Chelkowski11, Andrea Chincarini, John A. Clark12, E. Coccia13, C. N. Colacino, J. Colas, A. Cumming1, L. Cunningham1, E. Cuoco, S. L. Danilishin14, Karsten Danzmann3, G. De Luca, R. De Salvo15, T. Dent12, R. De Rosa, L. Di Fiore, A. Di Virgilio, M. Doets7, V. Fafone13, Paolo Falferi16, R. Flaminio17, J. Franc17, F. Frasconi, Andreas Freise11, Paul Fulda11, Jonathan R. Gair18, G. Gemme, A. Gennai11, A. Giazotto, Kostas Glampedakis19, M. Granata6, Hartmut Grote3, G. M. Guidi20, G. D. Hammond1, Mark Hannam21, Jan Harms22, D. Heinert23, Martin Hendry1, Ik Siong Heng1, Eric Hennes7, Stefan Hild1, J. H. Hough, Sascha Husa24, S. H. Huttner1, Gareth Jones12, F. Y. Khalili14, Keiko Kokeyama11, Kostas D. Kokkotas19, Badri Krishnan24, M. Lorenzini, Harald Lück3, Ettore Majorana, Ilya Mandel25, Vuk Mandic22, I. W. Martin1, C. Michel17, Y. Minenkov13, N. Morgado17, Simona Mosca, B. Mours26, H. Müller–Ebhardt3, P. G. Murray1, Ronny Nawrodt1, John Nelson1, Richard O'Shaughnessy27, Christian D. Ott15, C. Palomba, A. Paoli, G. Parguez, A. Pasqualetti, R. Passaquieti28, D. Passuello, L. Pinard17, Rosa Poggiani28, P. Popolizio, Mirko Prato, P. Puppo, D. S. Rabeling7, P. Rapagnani29, Jocelyn Read24, Tania Regimbau8, H. Rehbein3, Stuart Reid1, Luciano Rezzolla24, F. Ricci29, F. Richard, A. Rocchi, Sheila Rowan1, Albrecht Rüdiger3, Benoit Sassolas17, Bangalore Suryanarayana Sathyaprakash12, Roman Schnabel3, C. Schwarz, Paul Seidel, Alicia M. Sintes24, Kentaro Somiya15, Fiona C. Speirits1, Kenneth A. Strain1, S. E. Strigin14, P. J. Sutton12, S. P. Tarabrin14, Andre Thüring3, J. F. J. van den Brand7, C. van Leewen7, M. van Veggel1, C. Van Den Broeck12, Alberto Vecchio11, John Veitch11, F. Vetrano20, A. Viceré20, Sergey P. Vyatchanin14, Benno Willke3, Graham Woan1, P. Wolfango30, Kazuhiro Yamamoto3 
TL;DR: The third-generation ground-based observatory Einstein Telescope (ET) project as discussed by the authors is currently in its design study phase, and it can be seen as the first step in this direction.
Abstract: Advanced gravitational wave interferometers, currently under realization, will soon permit the detection of gravitational waves from astronomical sources. To open the era of precision gravitational wave astronomy, a further substantial improvement in sensitivity is required. The future space-based Laser Interferometer Space Antenna and the third-generation ground-based observatory Einstein Telescope (ET) promise to achieve the required sensitivity improvements in frequency ranges. The vastly improved sensitivity of the third generation of gravitational wave observatories could permit detailed measurements of the sources' physical parameters and could complement, in a multi-messenger approach, the observation of signals emitted by cosmological sources obtained through other kinds of telescopes. This paper describes the progress of the ET project which is currently in its design study phase.

1,497 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the location and geometry of the main shock and aftershocks recorded by permanent and temporary networks are presented. But the authors focus on the distribution of the aftershock events, 712 selected events with M L > 2.3 and 20 with M l > 4.0.
Abstract: [1] A M w 6.3 earthquake struck on April 6, 2009 the Abruzzi region (central Italy) producing vast damage in the L'Aquila town and surroundings. In this paper we present the location and geometry of the fault system as obtained by the analysis of main shock and aftershocks recorded by permanent and temporary networks. The distribution of aftershocks, 712 selected events with M L > 2.3 and 20 with M L > 4.0, defines a complex, 40 km long, NW trending extensional structure. The main shock fault segment extends for 15―18 km and dips at 45° to the SW, between 10 and 2 km depth. The extent of aftershocks coincides with the surface trace of the Paganica fault, a poorly known normal fault that, after the event, has been quoted to accommodate the extension of the area. We observe a migration of seismicity to the north on an echelon fault that can rupture in future large earthquakes.

334 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
M. Punturo, M. R. Abernathy1, Fausto Acernese2, Benjamin William Allen3, Nils Andersson4, K. G. Arun5, Fabrizio Barone2, B. Barr1, M. Barsuglia, M. G. Beker6, N. Beveridge1, S. Birindelli7, Suvadeep Bose8, L. Bosi, S. Braccini, C. Bradaschia, Tomasz Bulik9, Enrico Calloni, G. Cella, E. Chassande Mottin, Simon Chelkowski10, Andrea Chincarini, John A. Clark11, E. Coccia12, C. N. Colacino, J. Colas, A. Cumming1, L. Cunningham1, E. Cuoco, S. L. Danilishin13, Karsten Danzmann3, G. De Luca, R. De Salvo14, T. Dent11, R. T. DeRosa, L. Di Fiore, A. Di Virgilio, M. Doets6, V. Fafone12, Paolo Falferi15, R. Flaminio16, J. Franc16, F. Frasconi, Andreas Freise10, Paul Fulda10, Jonathan R. Gair17, G. Gemme, A. Gennai10, A. Giazotto, Kostas Glampedakis18, M. Granata, Hartmut Grote3, G. M. Guidi19, G. D. Hammond1, Mark Hannam20, Jan Harms21, D. Heinert22, Martin Hendry1, Ik Siong Heng1, Eric Hennes6, Stefan Hild3, J. H. Hough, Sascha Husa3, S. H. Huttner1, Gareth Jones11, F. Y. Khalili13, Keiko Kokeyama10, Kostas D. Kokkotas18, Badri Krishnan3, M. Lorenzini, Harald Lück3, Ettore Majorana, Ilya Mandel23, Vuk Mandic21, I. W. Martin1, C. Michel16, Y. Minenkov12, N. Morgado16, Simona Mosca, B. Mours24, Helge Müller-Ebhardt3, P. G. Murray1, Ronny Nawrodt1, John Nelson1, Richard O'Shaughnessy25, Christian D. Ott14, C. Palomba, A. Paoli, G. Parguez, A. Pasqualetti, R. Passaquieti26, D. Passuello, L. Pinard16, Rosa Poggiani26, P. Popolizio, Mirko Prato, P. Puppo, D. S. Rabeling6, P. Rapagnani27, Jocelyn Read3, Tania Regimbau7, H. Rehbein3, Stuart Reid1, Luciano Rezzolla3, F. Ricci27, F. Richard, A. Rocchi, Sheila Rowan1, Albrecht Rüdiger3, Benoit Sassolas16, Bangalore Suryanarayana Sathyaprakash11, Roman Schnabel3, C. Schwarz28, Paul Seidel28, Alicia M. Sintes3, Kentaro Somiya3, Fiona C. Speirits1, Kenneth A. Strain3, S. E. Strigin13, P. J. Sutton11, S. P. Tarabrin13, J. F. J. van den Brand6, C. van Leewen6, M. van Veggel1, C. Van Den Broeck11, Alberto Vecchio10, John Veitch10, F. Vetrano19, A. Viceré19, Sergey P. Vyatchanin13, Benno Willke3, Graham Woan1, P. Wolfango29, Kazuhiro Yamamoto3 
TL;DR: The status of the project Einstein Telescope (ET), a design study of a third-generation gravitational wave observatory, is reported in this paper, where an overview of the possible science reaches and the technological progress needed to realize a third generation observatory are discussed.
Abstract: Large gravitational wave interferometric detectors, like Virgo and LIGO, demonstrated the capability to reach their design sensitivity, but to transform these machines into an effective observational instrument for gravitational wave astronomy a large improvement in sensitivity is required. Advanced detectors in the near future and third-generation observatories in more than one decade will open the possibility to perform gravitational wave astronomical observations from the Earth. An overview of the possible science reaches and the technological progress needed to realize a third-generation observatory are discussed in this paper. The status of the project Einstein Telescope (ET), a design study of a third-generation gravitational wave observatory, will be reported.

319 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, two source centroids are identified, each representative of the distinct event types associated with explosive eruptions from two different vents, and the two sources that best fit the data are offset 220 and 260 m beneath and 160 m northwest of the active vents.
Abstract: [1] Seismic data recorded in the 2–30 s band at Stromboli Volcano, Italy, are analyzed to quantify the source mechanisms of Strombolian explosions during September 1997. To determine the source-centroid location and source mechanism, we minimize the residual error between data and synthetics calculated by the finite difference method for a point source embedded in a homogeneous elastic medium that takes topography into account. Two source centroids are identified, each representative of the distinct event types associated with explosive eruptions from two different vents. The observed waveforms are well reproduced by our inversion, and the two source centroids that best fit the data are offset 220 and 260 m beneath and 160 m northwest of the active vents. The source mechanisms include both moment-tensor and single-force components. The principal axes of the moment tensor have amplitude ratios 1:1:2, which can be interpreted as representative of a crack, if one assumes the rock matrix at the source to have a Poisson ratio n = 1/3, a value appropriate for hot rock. Both imaged cracks dip 60 to the northwest and strike northeast–southwest along a direction parallel to the elongation of the volcanic edifice and a prominent zone of structural weakness, as expressed by lineaments, dikes, and brittle structures. For our data set, the volume changes estimated from the moments are 200 m for the largest explosion from each vent. Together with the volumetric source is a dominantly vertical force with a magnitude of 10 N, consistent with the inferred movement of the magma column perched above the source centroid in response to the piston-like rise of a slug of gas in the conduit.

92 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present some preliminary results obtained from the analysis of the data collected by the permanent and the temporary networks operating in the area ofthe earthquake sequence that followed (andanticipated) the 26 September, Central Italy, mainshocks.
Abstract: We present some preliminary results obtained from thejoined analysis of the data collected by the permanentand the temporary networks operating in the area ofthe earthquake sequence that followed (andanticipated) the 26 September, Central Italy, mainshocks. In particular, these earthquake data haveallowed us to determine a well constrainedwave-velocity model (both P and S) with stationcorrections which demonstrated to produce robusthypocentral locations. These velocity modelswith station corrections have been used forre-locating the whole September 1997–July 1998subset of data of the permanent network, and theprevious background seismicity, starting from May1996. The focal mechanisms of the largest events werealso obtained from an analysis of the first-motionpolarities.Our results indicate that 1) the seismic activityaligns on a SE-NW trend for a total length of about50 km of extension; 2) the focal depth of theseevents is restricted to the range 0–9 km; 3) mostevents can be related to sub-parallel SW dipping faultplanes; 4) focal mechanisms of the largest shocks(ML > 4) show a coherent behaviour, withnormal fault solution on SSE-NNW striking, SW dippingplanes; 5) the space-time evolution of the activitydisplays a discontinuous mode of energy release, withdifferent episodes of activation and an apparentclustering of aftershocks at the edges of the areaswhich presumably ruptured in the main shocks.

77 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

6,278 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
M. Punturo, M. R. Abernathy1, Fausto Acernese2, Benjamin William Allen3, Nils Andersson4, K. G. Arun5, Fabrizio Barone2, B. Barr1, M. Barsuglia6, M. G. Beker7, N. Beveridge1, S. Birindelli8, Suvadeep Bose9, L. Bosi, S. Braccini, C. Bradaschia, Tomasz Bulik10, Enrico Calloni, G. Cella, E. Chassande Mottin6, Simon Chelkowski11, Andrea Chincarini, John A. Clark12, E. Coccia13, C. N. Colacino, J. Colas, A. Cumming1, L. Cunningham1, E. Cuoco, S. L. Danilishin14, Karsten Danzmann3, G. De Luca, R. De Salvo15, T. Dent12, R. De Rosa, L. Di Fiore, A. Di Virgilio, M. Doets7, V. Fafone13, Paolo Falferi16, R. Flaminio17, J. Franc17, F. Frasconi, Andreas Freise11, Paul Fulda11, Jonathan R. Gair18, G. Gemme, A. Gennai11, A. Giazotto, Kostas Glampedakis19, M. Granata6, Hartmut Grote3, G. M. Guidi20, G. D. Hammond1, Mark Hannam21, Jan Harms22, D. Heinert23, Martin Hendry1, Ik Siong Heng1, Eric Hennes7, Stefan Hild1, J. H. Hough, Sascha Husa24, S. H. Huttner1, Gareth Jones12, F. Y. Khalili14, Keiko Kokeyama11, Kostas D. Kokkotas19, Badri Krishnan24, M. Lorenzini, Harald Lück3, Ettore Majorana, Ilya Mandel25, Vuk Mandic22, I. W. Martin1, C. Michel17, Y. Minenkov13, N. Morgado17, Simona Mosca, B. Mours26, H. Müller–Ebhardt3, P. G. Murray1, Ronny Nawrodt1, John Nelson1, Richard O'Shaughnessy27, Christian D. Ott15, C. Palomba, A. Paoli, G. Parguez, A. Pasqualetti, R. Passaquieti28, D. Passuello, L. Pinard17, Rosa Poggiani28, P. Popolizio, Mirko Prato, P. Puppo, D. S. Rabeling7, P. Rapagnani29, Jocelyn Read24, Tania Regimbau8, H. Rehbein3, Stuart Reid1, Luciano Rezzolla24, F. Ricci29, F. Richard, A. Rocchi, Sheila Rowan1, Albrecht Rüdiger3, Benoit Sassolas17, Bangalore Suryanarayana Sathyaprakash12, Roman Schnabel3, C. Schwarz, Paul Seidel, Alicia M. Sintes24, Kentaro Somiya15, Fiona C. Speirits1, Kenneth A. Strain1, S. E. Strigin14, P. J. Sutton12, S. P. Tarabrin14, Andre Thüring3, J. F. J. van den Brand7, C. van Leewen7, M. van Veggel1, C. Van Den Broeck12, Alberto Vecchio11, John Veitch11, F. Vetrano20, A. Viceré20, Sergey P. Vyatchanin14, Benno Willke3, Graham Woan1, P. Wolfango30, Kazuhiro Yamamoto3 
TL;DR: The third-generation ground-based observatory Einstein Telescope (ET) project as discussed by the authors is currently in its design study phase, and it can be seen as the first step in this direction.
Abstract: Advanced gravitational wave interferometers, currently under realization, will soon permit the detection of gravitational waves from astronomical sources. To open the era of precision gravitational wave astronomy, a further substantial improvement in sensitivity is required. The future space-based Laser Interferometer Space Antenna and the third-generation ground-based observatory Einstein Telescope (ET) promise to achieve the required sensitivity improvements in frequency ranges. The vastly improved sensitivity of the third generation of gravitational wave observatories could permit detailed measurements of the sources' physical parameters and could complement, in a multi-messenger approach, the observation of signals emitted by cosmological sources obtained through other kinds of telescopes. This paper describes the progress of the ET project which is currently in its design study phase.

1,497 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, a review of recent achievements on various aspects of black hole perturbations are discussed such as decoupling of variables in the perturbation equations, quasinormal modes (with special emphasis on various numerical and analytical methods of calculations), late-time tails, gravitational stability, anti-de Sitter/conformal field theory interpretation, and holographic superconductors.
Abstract: Perturbations of black holes, initially considered in the context of possible observations of astrophysical effects, have been studied for the past 10 years in string theory, brane-world models, and quantum gravity. Through the famous gauge/gravity duality, proper oscillations of perturbed black holes, called quasinormal modes, allow for the description of the hydrodynamic regime in the dual finite temperature field theory at strong coupling, which can be used to predict the behavior of quark-gluon plasmas in the nonperturbative regime. On the other hand, the brane-world scenarios assume the existence of extra dimensions in nature, so that multidimensional black holes can be formed in a laboratory experiment. All this stimulated active research in the field of perturbations of higher-dimensional black holes and branes during recent years. In this review recent achievements on various aspects of black hole perturbations are discussed such as decoupling of variables in the perturbation equations, quasinormal modes (with special emphasis on various numerical and analytical methods of calculations), late-time tails, gravitational stability, anti--de Sitter/conformal field theory interpretation of quasinormal modes, and holographic superconductors. We also touch on state-of-the-art observational possibilities for detecting quasinormal modes of black holes.

1,070 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
R. Abbott1, T. D. Abbott2, Sheelu Abraham3, Fausto Acernese4  +1332 moreInstitutions (150)
TL;DR: It is inferred that the primary black hole mass lies within the gap produced by (pulsational) pair-instability supernova processes, with only a 0.32% probability of being below 65 M⊙, which can be considered an intermediate mass black hole (IMBH).
Abstract: On May 21, 2019 at 03:02:29 UTC Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo observed a short duration gravitational-wave signal, GW190521, with a three-detector network signal-to-noise ratio of 14.7, and an estimated false-alarm rate of 1 in 4900 yr using a search sensitive to generic transients. If GW190521 is from a quasicircular binary inspiral, then the detected signal is consistent with the merger of two black holes with masses of 85_{-14}^{+21} M_{⊙} and 66_{-18}^{+17} M_{⊙} (90% credible intervals). We infer that the primary black hole mass lies within the gap produced by (pulsational) pair-instability supernova processes, with only a 0.32% probability of being below 65 M_{⊙}. We calculate the mass of the remnant to be 142_{-16}^{+28} M_{⊙}, which can be considered an intermediate mass black hole (IMBH). The luminosity distance of the source is 5.3_{-2.6}^{+2.4} Gpc, corresponding to a redshift of 0.82_{-0.34}^{+0.28}. The inferred rate of mergers similar to GW190521 is 0.13_{-0.11}^{+0.30} Gpc^{-3} yr^{-1}.

876 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
J. Abadie1, B. P. Abbott1, R. Abbott1, T. D. Abbott2  +611 moreInstitutions (63)
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors demonstrate the squeezed-light enhancement of GEO600, which will be the GW observatory operated by the LIGO Scientific Collaboration in its search for GWs for the next 3-4 years.
Abstract: Around the globe several observatories are seeking the first direct detection of gravitational waves (GWs). These waves are predicted by Einstein’s general theory of relativity1 and are generated, for example, by black-hole binary systems2. Present GW detectors are Michelson-type kilometre-scale laser interferometers measuring the distance changes between mirrors suspended in vacuum. The sensitivity of these detectors at frequencies above several hundred hertz is limited by the vacuum (zero-point) fluctuations of the electromagnetic field. A quantum technology—the injection of squeezed light3—offers a solution to this problem. Here we demonstrate the squeezed-light enhancement of GEO 600, which will be the GW observatory operated by the LIGO Scientific Collaboration in its search for GWs for the next 3–4 years. GEO 600 now operates with its best ever sensitivity, which proves the usefulness of quantum entanglement and the qualification of squeezed light as a key technology for future GW astronomy4.

810 citations